How to treat the act of revealing the personal identity information of fraud victims from the media?

I think the information of the fraudster should be made public, not the information of the victim.

Internet part-time fraud refers to a fraudulent way to defraud users of money under the guise of false part-time recruitment. On the occasion of the rise of e-commerce, fraudsters have been eyeing the gray industry of "part-time brushing" and used its name to defraud. The rise of short video applications, such as Tik Tok and Aauto Quicker, has also enabled fraudsters to find new methods.

Recently, YCY fans and Mengmeiqi fans quarreled over trifles. Fans of both sides called each other's idols "paste coffee" in Weibo, which stirred the programmer's dream for a time. After the official blocked the corresponding keywords, the two sides still dig deep into each other's material everywhere. Who knows, this dig actually made YCY fans discover an economic event in which Meng Meiqi data station was suspected of defrauding millions. Subsequently, on September 1 1, Huo Qingcheng published an article entitled "Exclusive Investigation on Fraud in Mengmeiqi Data Station" on WeChat official account "Sina Entertainment", revealing the personal identity information of fraud victims and relevant information of the police station.

Because this fraud case involves two complex and sensitive fields, namely, the fraudulent interest chain and fund-raising in the pink circle, the victim is extremely vulnerable to intimidation and harassment by fraud criminals and fanatical fans. Some victims also believe that Mengmeiqi fans are related to fraud companies, which may even be an event in which professional fans get involved in the gray production chain to make money.

Will the victims be harassed, coerced or even threatened? Will the local police station be disturbed in the process of detecting cases? We don't know. However, this reporter actually put key information such as reporting address and police station directly on the Internet without coding, which almost condones potential fraudsters and fanatical fans to threaten, interfere and attack the victims in the next step, and local police stations are more vulnerable to pressure. This kind of behavior, whether due to subjective intention or objective inaction, has extremely bad influence.

In a case involving so many victims and such a complicated interest chain, it is really wrong for such an entertainment reporter to make such a report. Rough views, welcome to spit.