Excuse me, what is the so-called job security? I don't quite understand!

Another interview season. With the written test results of civil servants in various provinces released, the pace of interview also followed. When interviewing candidates to choose remedial classes, the most common sentence is "1: 1 job security". So what exactly is job protection? Is it as magical as the legend? What is job protection?

"1: 1 job security" is a commitment in civil service examination training, which is common in interview. Specifically, for example, Li applied for a court position, which recruited 1 person, and the interview shortlisted ratio was 1:3. If Li signs up, other candidates who are shortlisted for the position with him will lose their qualification to sign up in the institution and cannot participate in the interview training of the institution.

Many counseling institutions vigorously promote "1: 1 job security" as a selling point. But smart consumers will soon find that this is just a gimmick, a propaganda method, and there is no essential difference between the essence and the supermarket's first price increase and then discount.

2. "1:1job protection" is just a publicity stunt, and its essence is the protection of training institutions.

"1: 1 protection afterwards" protection is meaningless. Even if the training institution only recruits 1 candidates, how can we ensure that other candidates cannot find other training institutions? If other training institutions are better than the training institutions you apply for, and other candidates work harder than you, what is the meaning of the so-called 1: 1 job security? This is just a cover-up.

From the perspective of intermediaries, because only one person can be admitted to a position in the end, if a training institution recruits three people, two of them will lose, which is a fatal blow to the passing rate of training institutions. But if only 1 students sign up, it will be very good publicity if the exam is accepted. Whether the exam can be accepted depends on the ultimate strength of the candidates themselves. Therefore, "1: 1 post protection" is essentially the protection of training institutions! ! !

What's more, some training institutions use the guise of "1: 1 job security", and the actual enrollment far exceeds this ratio, keeping candidates out. Last year, 5438+065438+ 10, a national examination candidate, was attracted by "1: 1 job security" of a training institution after entering the interview, and signed up for an expensive class. But on the day of the interview, I found that the so-called job security was nonsense, and only half of the four people asked the same training institution. ! ! ! Students in this position were attacked, and the theory of finding a business was cheated and denied, and they refused to respond. T-chat caused strong dissatisfaction among other students in the group after the student left the group. He lied that the fake group directly dissolved the group. What clumsy means did he use to really treat his classmates as fools? Can't the group owner dissolve the group? There is still no clear statement, and such examples are numerous.

The real protection is not job protection, but the protection of candidates themselves, that is, "student protection". "student protection" only emphasizes one point: it is necessary to be hard while the iron is hot! Student security is to set up training courses that meet students' own conditions and characteristics according to their own specific conditions.

Do you choose to transform yourself according to the mold on the assembly line? Or do you choose to build a unique advantage that conforms to your own characteristics and has your own professionalism according to your own characteristics? I believe you will definitely choose the latter!

To tell the truth, any exam requires your own efforts. On the basis of your own efforts, you can only choose the learning methods and training methods that suit you, so that you can go up a storey still higher.