When the interview is a blind date, demand is the key to eloquence. What three points are the embodiment of ability?

The interview is not a one-sided question and answer, but a two-way communication.

For fresh graduates, because many people lack social and workplace experience, what they are most afraid of is the level of company interviews. Always guessing what the interviewer will ask, always asking friends what to prepare before the interview, you need to ponder and guess what the interviewer will ask in advance. In fact, these behaviors have deviated from the essence of interview recruitment. For enterprises, the biggest role of interview is to find the person who is suitable for the recruitment position, rather than unilaterally testing the interviewer's ability. For the interviewer, in fact, most people regard the interview as an exam, thinking about what the interviewer will ask and how to answer it. It became a one-sided question and answer. This kind of interview effect will be greatly reduced for both the recruiter and the interviewer. So what should the interviewer do in the interview, so that the other party can fully understand their matching degree and ability to each position, and also take the initiative in the interview process?

Grasping the initiative of the interview, I have already got half of the offer.

Our common interview mode is this: after the interviewer gives his resume to the interviewer, he introduces himself and waits for the interviewer to ask questions one by one. Of course, this is the normal process of the interview, but the problem appears during the interview. Whether asking questions or answering questions, the interviewer is guiding you. You don't take the initiative to grasp the interview rhythm, and always play the role of topic terminator. For a simple example, when interviewing programmers for this job, most interviewers will ask:

Have you ever led a big project in the company before? Any experience in leading a team? Your answer: No, no experience.

First of all, from the fact, this is a very sincere answer, but it is not an excellent interview performance. On the basis of respecting the facts, you should make auxiliary efforts to get your offer as much as possible. Although there may be such a situation that you have no experience in leading a team or making a big project, you can let the interviewer know your caliber from another angle. The essence of interview is to get to know each other through mutual communication.

I don't have much experience in projects and teams, but I have taken over the background operation and maintenance management and development of a company's app before, with a small team of several people. If you are interested, I can tell you.

Although such an answer did not give the interviewer the answer he wanted to a certain extent, he actually took the initiative of the topic in his own hands. Then the average interviewer will be willing to listen to your experience. At this time, he was the initiator of the topic and took the initiative in the interview. What the interviewer wants to see most is not what he asks and what you answer. But in the process of interview, I hope the interviewer of the other party can be the initiator or even the leader of this interview, because in this way, the interviewer can get to know you as much as possible in the shortest time without knowing it, so as to finally judge whether you can successfully get the offer. Although each interviewer has his own questions and his own interview rhythm, it is largely to deal with those interviewers who answer questions and avoid embarrassment on the spot. For the interviewer, talking about Kan Kan in the interview field is just the embodiment of personal ability.

Learn to use questions to reverse disadvantages and seize opportunities.

Every round of interview always has its own problems, which is a normal phenomenon in the interview, especially professional problems, which test personal ability. But it doesn't matter if you lose. Being able to find one's own plus points from the losing situation is the ability that an excellent interviewer should have, and it is also a part of his personal ability. For example, when interviewing a programmer, the interviewer will definitely ask technical and professional questions. Suppose the interviewer's question is like this:

Please describe the background and the principle of architecture construction, how to build optimization and how to solve related problems.

Don't worry about such questions, even if you lose, you can't answer them. You can respond to the interviewer like this.

Sorry, interviewer, I really didn't know much about this before, and I have never encountered such a situation. Can you tell me how your company solved and realized it?

The purpose of throwing this question is not to really understand the principle behind it, but to find what you are familiar with and good at in the process of seeking the interviewer's explanation. Some people may say that the interviewer may not necessarily answer your questions. Generally speaking, as long as it doesn't look stupid, it is aimed at technical problems and interviewers' questions. As mentioned above, this is a two-way communication and understanding process, and the interviewer will say a little more or less. When the interviewer elaborates, he should try to grasp what he knows and is good at, so as to make up for the loss of points that he could not answer before. You can answer this.

After listening to your explanation, I found that you mentioned a point just now, which I knew better before, and I studied it myself. Many things were involved in my previous work. I think according to my previous work experience and your explanation just now, what is the biggest difference and so on?

In fact, what I fear most during the interview is that the interviewer has nothing to say. This is the most embarrassing thing. Although I failed in the last question, the way to find an advantage by asking questions like this can also make the interviewer shine and think that you are a thoughtful person. Although the previous questions lowered my score, this performance can also give me extra points.

The most taboo in an interview is to chat with the interviewer to death. The interviewer asked you a technical question, and you just said no, so there is basically no possibility of continuing. This is a taboo closed topic in the interview. The interviewer's questions can be very technical, but your answers should not make the interviewer feel that there is nothing to talk about, and there is a feeling that he wants to end the interview quickly. Once you make the interviewer feel this way, your interview is basically the same.

Don't treat the so-called interview as an exam. Although the components capable of testing are in it, it is ultimately a process of mutual understanding. What recruiters require is ability, and ability is more suitable and matching the required position. It is impossible to be incompetent, so the interview is a process of getting to know each other in the final analysis. It is only the most basic for the interviewer to get to know you efficiently in a short time, but it is also crucial to do these things well.