The recruitment requirements of the Big Four accounting firms are

I have been interviewed by three of the top four companies this year and got offers from two. I think their requirements are: good school, good grades, good English, good practical experience), the thinking shown in the interview Good logic, good expression, team player (this is hard to explain clearly), etc. . . The more of these general conditions you have, the better. If these general conditions are poor, then you must have outstanding achievements in other aspects, such as winning some eye-catching awards that reflect your ability, or doing something great. . . .

In addition, the requirements of the four companies are also slightly different. For example, Deloitte's performance requirements are more rigid and tough, and Ernst & Young's English requirements are higher than those of the other three companies. I can't observe any rigid requirements at PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG. For example, they will accept applicants who are excellent in other aspects but poor in English.

The procedures are: online application-gt; written test-gt; interview-gt; partner interview

Interview process:

PricewaterhouseCoopers: interview ( Self-introduction for 30 seconds-gt; warm-up game-gt; case analysis (two groups of PK)-gt; one-sided interview with the manager-gt; two-sided partner interview

KPMG: one-sided (one interview will be sent three days in advance) The question will prepare you for a presentation. During the interview, you will present for 10 minutes, answer the manager’s questions about the presentation, and then proceed to one-sided)-gt; two-sided partner interview

Ernst & Young: One-sided session lasts for 3.5 hours (ice-breaking-gt ; Case discussion-gt; Debate-gt; One-sided meeting with manager)-gt; Two-sided meeting with partner.

Deloitte: Deloitte's recruitment process is the stupidest. The written test is actually a personality test (sick), the interview is unclear, and my online application was inexplicably rejected.