If you want to be a criminal defense lawyer after graduating from undergraduate law, do you have to take the postgraduate entrance examination to have a future?

This is not necessarily what I heard from the directors of many law firms and famous lawyers. Their law firm now tends to recruit lawyers for undergraduates, because undergraduates are full of energy, have no rigid and stubborn mentality, pay less attention to graduate education and pay more attention to actual combat experience. I remember a lawyer who took me once said that there is basically no way out for law undergraduates to study for graduate students. Because as a graduate student, his research is professional, and for a lawyer, every case will not be one-on-one, but will often involve many fields, such as economy, politics, management and so on. What he needs is an all-round and multi-field knowledge-based talent. And to tell the truth, the real study time of graduate students is estimated to be more than 8 months in total, and they all learn dead knowledge and have no practical experience. It is understood that law firms often need to train new lawyers in theory first, instead of learning empty talk theory at school, but combine various cases and real social conditions to instill comprehensive theories into new lawyers and increase their practical foundation. Therefore, regarding the question you mentioned, I don't think it is necessary to worry about academic qualifications. As long as you dare to take risks, dare to do, learn more and ask more questions, work harder and improve yourself, you will still achieve something.