Summarize the relationship between kingship and religious power in Aquinas' political views. What is the similarity in content and essence between this and Dong Zhongshu's political proposition of Chi

Summarize the relationship between kingship and religious power in Aquinas' political views. What is the similarity in content and essence between this and Dong Zhongshu's political proposition of China in Han Dynasty? Much worse. In the west, kingship is subordinate to religious power. The so-called kingship is given by God, and most western emperors want the pope to be crowned. Of course, there will be some resistance, even some independent popes, but in Aquinas' time, this is simply unimaginable. And Dong Zhongshu, to tell the truth, is just a doll of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. You can't compare with the Pope. Heaven and man are connected. The spokesman of heaven on earth is undoubtedly the son of heaven. In this way, the son of heaven has not only the highest political rights, but also the highest religious rights. Instead of being divided like the west. I'm afraid the decentralization system adopted by the west so far has something to do with this.