Why are reliable employees harder and harder to find?

Why are reliable employees harder and harder to find? The answer to this question can be found in three aspects. The first aspect is social guidance; The second aspect is the status quo of the workplace; The third aspect of self-employment (disguised self-employment) has a low threshold. Let's try to analyze it and see if it makes sense. In the first aspect, society guides the continuous development of society, and people have a new life for wealth or acquisition of wealth. That is, "take a shortcut." Hydropower (unconscious) will take shortcuts, not to mention people (conscious)? It is a natural law to take shortcuts.

We can easily determine which interface is the first or which interface has a larger cross-sectional area. People are not so good at judging unless they take shortcuts. On the contrary, many chicken soups for the soul show that there are no shortcuts in life (of course, I can understand the meaning of shortcuts in chicken soups for the soul). Really? Actually, there is! That is the "only reading is high" that is currently respected.

Through study, one can change the fate of life, study hard for 20 years directly (from the age of three in kindergarten to graduation from university), step into the society and enter a good unit. You can create a wonderful life. Moreover, the result of interest distribution in the real society also confirms this point (of course, not most college students are the result, this is just the desire for a good result in the pursuit process). As a result, people began to do a lot of things like "don't lose from the beginning", and school district housing became a hot topic; Children have become popular in many ways (not overwhelmed by art anyway); Extracurricular tutoring has become a hot topic. Choose kindergarten to prepare for primary school; Choose a primary school to prepare for junior high school; Choose junior high school to prepare for senior high school; Choose high school as a university. To the university, alas! Finally, I breathed a deep sigh of relief and felt that I had it. Keep playing for a few more years, and the shortcut is finally finished. How many people are willing to start from the basic salary around the starting point of life? If someone insists that it is possible, I can only be speechless.

It can be seen that such people are unwilling to accept the low wages of enterprises (except for no food). Enterprises can't recruit such reliable people.

The second aspect of the current situation of the workplace From the current situation of the workplace, there are few workplaces that do business, and workplaces that aim at making money are all over the streets. Doing business depends on theory, good values, noble quality and responsibility (responsibility to society and employees). Obviously it's much easier to make money. As long as you have a strong desire to make money, everything can make way for it. Capable bosses will try their best to find money in the market; Incompetent bosses not only try their best to make money from the market, but also try their best to "reduce wage costs" on employees. At the beginning of private ownership, they didn't think so. Because people were too hungry at that time and rushed to eat everything, many "labor-intensive enterprises or industries" appeared. Nowadays, with the development of society, people's expectations of life are also high, or the cost of real life has also increased. The salary level in the workplace is not very attractive in the eyes of ordinary people, let alone in the eyes of "reliable" people? "Reliable" employees have their own reliable development or accumulation direction and methods. Therefore, it is difficult to find "reliable" employees in the modern workplace, and only ordinary employees below the "subsistence line" can be recruited.

The third aspect is the low threshold for self-employment (self-employment in disguised form). Modern society encourages people to start their own businesses, while "reliable" people have more capital and desire to start their own businesses. Even if I try my best in the workplace, I can't make any money except solving the problems of ordinary people's lives. Moreover, the older you get, the less valuable you are. Once you pass puberty, you lose the value of your labor force and are abandoned by the workplace at any time. There are many reasons, such as "what workplace is not a charity", "what workplace does not keep idle people" and "what workplace does not have this responsibility". Driven by the fact that you can be the boss and I can be the boss. As a result, many "reliable" employees have also embarked on the road of self-employment. Have the ability to start some products and services by themselves; Those with poor ability can set up stalls or sell on the move or wait for employment under the bridge; There are also some young people, especially some college students, who simply have a youthful meal and start a business in disguise to start a courier; If you have more capital, take out some money to drive a taxi. Destiny is in our own hands. Although some people have fallen, we should also see more people being created. Isn't life spent falling and getting up again? Even if you can't make money, you will end up living comfortably. Therefore, there are still "reliable" people to be recruited by you.

To sum up, in order to recruit reliable employees in the workplace, in addition to the correct social value orientation, the workplace itself should also be "reliable", and it is difficult to recruit "reliable" employees. Even if you recruit "reliable" employees, you can't expect it for a long time. "Reliable" employees are regarded as "training institutions" and "paid" when they enter the workplace. What did you say?/Sorry? It's comforting to see such a quiet beauty. Judging from the problem itself, this is obviously put forward from the standpoint of the boss. Bosses who can ask such questions are either mentally retarded or have low emotional intelligence. It may be a little difficult for such a boss to run the company well because he is unreliable!

A boss or enterprise manager with comprehensive quality should have an overall view in talent recruitment, training, job creation, salary, position promotion and future planning. The boss's employment mechanism can be directly reflected from the human resources department. If the company does not have a human resource manager like Bole, it is difficult to learn from talent recruitment.

The so-called reliability is actually a particularly obscure word. If it is placed in the development of enterprises, the word loyalty should be used more appropriately. How to make employees treat their work faithfully, how to make employees feel that they are the masters of the company, how to make employees have warm and loving care at home, how to match their wages and contributions, and so on. These all need to achieve the goal with perfect management system and corporate culture.

But the reality is cruel. There are not many bosses with emotional temperature, but most of them pursue ultimate interests. Therefore, many newcomers often feel the cold environment of the company soon after joining the company. Over time, personal interests and demands can not be reasonably satisfied, personnel and personnel are unfair, and intrigue among colleagues is mutually exclusive, which gradually makes people feel sad. Having said so much, there is no loyalty.

Therefore, a good boss will never say that his employees are unreliable, but should think about whether he is a reliable boss, whether he can give employees a sense of psychological security and let employees play their greatest potential. Even if one day the employee leaves, you should send him a farewell. I believe that employee will come back one day, because by contrast, I still think your boss is really human. People's hearts are all meat. If you change your mind for the truth, the boss will find that your employees are really reluctant to leave you.

Ten years of experience, from small white to cross-industry, to old employees and then to leaders, tell you that it is more and more difficult to find reliable employees, but there are fewer and fewer reliable companies, resulting in fewer and fewer reliable employees.

This is not a tongue twister, I'll tell you in detail. Many people go from small white to work, and many people are shaped by the company. So many companies will wonder why many people look so unreliable. Let's talk about the company's own problems first. From the aspects of management, promotion, system, salary and welfare, most companies have different views, that is, the original promise has not been fully realized, but employees are allowed to make maximum contributions to the company. As a result, many reliable employees have become tactful about their behavior because of the company.

As we all know, honest, practical, stable and reliable employees are deeply loved, but do such employees really have high viability in the company? The answer is no, often in many companies, hypocritical and cunning people tend to live longer. There is no need to give detailed examples. Everybody knows that. Similarly, in many enterprises, especially private enterprises, bosses often look at such seemingly smart people, but they are actually people with personality problems. Therefore, many employees who were originally reliable had to learn to improve their abilities in order to survive, and they changed from reliable to seemingly unreliable.

Of course, not only the company, but also some employees' own habits and working methods are quite amazing. Maybe this kind of person is not a good job proposition from the beginning, or he is not short of money, or he is young and energetic.

However, most employees who have experienced storms and valuable experiences change themselves in order to adapt to the company. Therefore, don't always say that employees are unreliable, provided that the company is unreliable. What kind of company will train what kind of people.

I have never experienced it for many years, and I am deeply touched by it. Let me tell you what I think.

To put it to the extreme, it is increasingly difficult for many companies to find unreliable employees, and now many factories can't even recruit ordinary employees. That reliable employee is even harder to find.

The society is progressing, and people's thoughts are constantly changing. The former post-70s were hardworking, law-abiding and simple-minded, but now the post-90s and post-00s have undergone great changes in their ideas. They have never suffered or been punished since childhood. They pursue laissez-faire, can't stand too much restraint and criticism, can't stand anger and injustice, and have low ability, big temper and strong self-esteem. This also makes people feel that the current employees are not as reliable as the previous generation.

But then again, how reliable are the current companies and bosses? Arrears of wages, poor benefits, unfulfilled promises, no overtime pay, and the boss only recognizes money and denies people. How can the following employees work wholeheartedly for the company?

Take my present company as an example. There are a lot of rules and regulations in the company, and then there are all kinds of distrust. A special inspection department is set up to audit the work of employees and cadres in the company. The boss only looks at the mistakes made by employees, not the achievements made. If you make a mistake, you will be fined, scolded and even humiliated, but you will not say anything about your grades. The more things you do, the more mistakes you make and the more fines you are criticized, but no one cares how many things you do. And those who do little or nothing do nothing, but nothing happens. Who wants to do more under this system? Good employees have also become bad employees.

No matter how high the status is, it can't be decided by a penny. Every penny you spend must be approved. And if one day you feel useless, you will be kicked away rudely. What does this make the following employees think?

Therefore, it is not that there are no good employees, but that the environment cannot make good employees. Employees are human beings, and they have to support their families. No one wants to pay only and not get the corresponding return. The company and the boss may say that people are not easy to manage, are not dedicated, have no sense of responsibility and do not consider the overall situation, so there is nothing I can do.

Compared with the company, employees are weak after all. The rule is that the company and the boss have decided that the employees can only obey and cannot change. So this environment is also caused by the company and the boss, and the ultimate reason for this result is also the company and the boss themselves.

The company is everyone's home, and employees have no reason not to unite. Even if I leave, it is always possible to introduce myself. Acquaintances are very accommodating and enthusiastic!

It's difficult to recruit people because the company didn't keep them. Go out and ask for money, no one will want to be a general worker all his life. Besides, don't you shop around? Whoever respects me, is willing to invest in me, and who doesn't, will soon be "reliable", which is what I want.

It is easy to find a job, but it is not easy to find a satisfactory one. If reliable, acquaintances will get together with informants!

The company has high requirements, and the quality is of course guaranteed. The threshold is high and the cost is high. Everything is thought by people, and it is still carried out by people. Not to mention dividends, as long as the benefits are good enough. Finally, only by retaining talents can innovation reduce costs!

Employee: Why is it harder and harder to find a reliable boss?

Boss: Why are reliable employees getting harder and harder to find?

Employee: I take 10k, so I should do 10k. Why should I pay twice as much energy? My boss doesn't pay me much.

Boss: I can't give you a salary of 20 K until you have completed the value of 20 K. You didn't do it. Why should I give it to you? Don't give.

Employee: I asked for 15k, and my boss gave me 20k. The boss is very angry and I want to get back at him.

Boss: Since all the employees ask me for 20k, I will give them more work to keep them busy.

Why is this happening?

Two people regard each other as enemies. The boss thinks that giving money means squeezing surplus value. Employees think that the boss is exploiting himself and mistreating others, so they will not work hard.

Can't find reliable employees? Why don't you think about it, have you been a reliable boss and given a reliable and reasonable treatment? Looking at the recruitment demand of a new media operation I saw before, it was really hilarious.

Want to recruit reliable employees, first look at their own needs?

Employers and employees are always a pair of contradictions. Nowadays, the workplace is more and more inclined to choose from each other and choose from both sides. In the final analysis, it is still a game of employee workplace prices. Talent is not the "best" for enterprises, but the "most suitable" is more suitable. Bosses know this well, and it is far more appropriate to find the most cost-effective talent than to find the best talent. At present, there is no problem that it is difficult for talents with market proof ability to find jobs, and enterprises often compete for talents. It is often newcomers or "strangers" who find it difficult to find a job.

In an industry, all bosses use two dimensions to select talents, one is their own values of knowing people, and the other is the professional level needed by this industry. The former is a soft index and varies from person to person; The latter is a hard indicator, which is verified by practice and word of mouth. For the boss, knowing people and being good at their duties is a basic skill, and the quality of an enterprise is often reflected in the boss's level of knowing people and employing people. Don't consider the boss's "no" from the employee's point of view. The boss uses the wrong person, employees can jump ship, but the boss may face bankruptcy.

Employees often get together to scold the boss, and it is very wronged to have less money and live more. Bosses generally don't scold employees face to face, but often silently complain that employees are uncomfortable to use, their performance is not outstanding, and their ability is insufficient. How to grasp the balance point of two-way choice between employees and bosses? I think the boss and employees should be divided into 70% and 30%, 70% of the reasons and decisions are in the boss and 30% in the employees.

Judging from the idea of boss selection, the first thing is to be able to work hard and create benefits. The second is that the personality is controllable, not necessarily a good personality. Capable people may not all have good personalities, but can the boss not use them? The boss has his own way, even if it is a villain, the boss should make good use of it, take advantage of the villain's strengths and guard against the villain's risks. For employees with good character, the boss can't replace supervision with trust (or let go of power, don't worry, be on guard). To put it bluntly, employees with good character may be tempted by interests to betray the company. The third is the staff's personality, style and so on, which is not so important. For example, some bosses like employees to work overtime and be dedicated, and some bosses just talk about it. You just have to hand over your performance. If you are capable, the boss doesn't care whether you work overtime or not. People who don't have great skills require "attitude".

Judging from the thinking of employees choosing bosses, the more money, the better. Employees can ignore their own value, but the more the better. They especially like to compare with other talents in the same industry or their colleagues. The second is the work intensity, which meets the first requirement. The intensity of work is acceptable, but employees complain a lot about jobs with less money and greater intensity. The third is the respect of the boss, which will be highlighted in the first two unsatisfactory situations. When employees leave their jobs, they often use their bosses and superiors as an excuse to disrespect themselves. The fourth is the company's interpersonal relationship and colleague culture, which is also one of the reasons for leaving the company. The fifth is the speed of promotion. Employees especially like to compare with their classmates to see who gets promoted quickly. This is related to the industry. Emerging industries have improved rapidly, while traditional industries have improved slowly. This is an objective reason, ranking fifth.

To sum up, the boss is not good or bad, because the enterprise is his own, and it is his bad luck to use the employees badly. In the eyes of the boss, employees are good and bad. The boss doesn't care whether the employees appreciate the boss, but the employees must care whether the boss doesn't appreciate themselves. The decision-making power in the job market still lies with the boss, whose style determines the pattern of his employment. But it is difficult for employees to find jobs. Can you blame the boss? No, the boss is responsible for himself. How he hires people is entirely up to him.

For this dilemma, employees should find their own reasons, which have little to do with the boss. It is only natural for the boss to hire people to make money for himself. Employees can't find a job, they can only blame themselves, either the industry is saturated or it can't be lower. Can't anyone find a job? No, the talent market is a structural contradiction, a good city, a good company and a good industry. Supply exceeds demand, and small companies in remote areas can't find suitable talents in traditional industries. As long as the talent is slightly degraded, you can find a job, but it is really difficult for the boss to find someone he is satisfied with.

This is a magical era, employees complain that good companies are hard to find, and companies complain that good employees are hard to find. It is easy for employees to complain that good companies are hard to find, because everyone likes high positions, light responsibilities, more money and less work, and freedom. They sleep until they wake up naturally and don't have to take a bus to get close to home.

Realistically speaking, it is not difficult to find a job now, and a good job is hard to find. A young man who has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on college will do security and cleaning with a monthly salary of more than 1000 yuan?

Pay will be rewarded, pay a lot, naturally pay more, after all, do business should also pay attention to the shortest time to recover costs.

Reliable employees are increasingly hard to find for five reasons: 1, and post-90 s become the main force of newcomers in the workplace. As the most common one-child generation, their living conditions are better, and those who grow up in honeypots are more self-centered, stronger in personality, more intolerant of criticism and easier to quit.

2. Education is seriously behind the times, and what is taught is often backward and useless, which does not meet the requirements of the times and companies. Newcomers often have low thoughts and work ability, but the requirements are not low. It only takes a few months to a year for the company to train qualified employees.

3. Today's society is full of temptations, and new occupations are constantly emerging, such as network anchors, such as shooting small videos, self-media and game practice. Various occupations that look more interesting are obviously more attractive and have higher returns, which makes young people pay less attention to traditional jobs and may change jobs at any time.

4. Under the high housing price, everyone becomes impetuous. If the salary is low, don't talk about buying a house. The pressure of renting a house is great, and you can naturally find a position with higher salary if you have the ability. Just like the grass-roots staff in a research institute, the original annual salary is1.2000, which is directly one million after job-hopping in a private enterprise, and it is expected to rise to one-third of the salary after job-hopping in the original unit.

5. With the economic development entering a stage, private enterprises are generally struggling to survive. The world is full of icing on the cake, and there are very few people who send charcoal in the snow. Few people want to stay on a sinking ship. Poor business conditions, low wages, delayed wages, difficult commitments and poor development prospects are all important reasons for employees' resignation, and employees cannot be blamed for being unreliable.

I answer your question from two angles:

1, people are not attracted, but attracted. We all know that recruitment is a two-way choice, but it's not that simple.

Let me give you an example. For example, if you go on a blind date, will you find a date for a girl of 100? If so, there will be no single people in this society.

Therefore, we need to find ways to attract the attention of girls, and blind date can be successful.

Similarly, if you want to attract reliable employees in the workplace, you have to match them accordingly. If you have nothing, let alone reliable employees, even ordinary employees can't attract you. Think about it, do you want to use those people that other companies don't want to use? You don't want to use it, and you can't recruit better people. What should I do? Many companies can only choose "something is better than nothing" and recruit these people.

The essence of management is that a group of people influence a group of people, and companies are all employees who muddle along, so you can't attract excellent employees, because they are incompatible with this group of people, and they will never stay long.

2. You can attract the real you. If you want to attract excellent employees, you must first make yourself excellent. Let me give you an example:

Most companies have experienced on-site recruitment, either in the talent market or on campus. If your company will resume trading, you will find an interesting phenomenon: whoever you send will get it back. For example, if you send a newly graduated college student, he will find a bunch of resumes of college students. So many people say that on-site recruitment has no effect, in fact, it is because the people you sent are not suitable. In other words, if your company wants to recruit sales, go to the sales champion, because people of the same type will attract each other, and they will have many topics, which will naturally make it easier to recruit.

By the same token, as the boss of the company, if your pattern is not high enough, you will not attract the top of the big pattern, and naturally you will not attract excellent middle and grassroots.

To sum up, the company can't recruit reliable people because your company itself is unreliable. Think about it. There are so many excellent enterprises in China with tens of thousands of employees. Employees are unreliable, can the company have today's achievements? Let's compare the excellent peers. Which enterprise has fewer outstanding employees?

As managers, we should understand a truth: I am the root of everything. If you want to meet reliable employees, you must first make yourself excellent, and there is no other way.

-End-

It is not that employees are unreliable, but that building a reliable employee requires many factors, not only the quality and efforts of employees themselves, but also a good external environment and reliable leadership, all of which are indispensable.

From the perspective of employee literacy, in order to be a reliable employee, employees must have down-to-earth personality and proactive quality. If an employee is erratic and doesn't know how to make progress, no matter how the unit and leaders train and guide him, he can't be a reliable employee in high probability. Employees have good basic quality, which is the premise and foundation.

From the perspective of the unit environment, to build a reliable employee, the unit must advocate hard work and pragmatism. If the overall style of the unit is floating, the atmosphere is not good, and everyone is idle, then no one will be willing to be a reliable employee at all, because the more reliable employees, the more work they undertake, and often they will not get the rewards they deserve.

From the perspective of leadership, if you want to create reliable employees, you must have a more reliable leader. In fact, whether employees are reliable or not has a lot to do with their direct leadership. If the employee's direct leader is an arrogant, ignorant and overbearing tyrant, then the employee can't be a reliable employee anyway. You know, only reliable leaders can create reliable employees.

As a small leader of the unit, I am lucky to have a reliable subordinate around me. Anyway, as long as I give it to this subordinate, I will feel at ease. If I give it to others, there will always be some concerns. Facts have repeatedly proved that this subordinate is trustworthy and positive. Every time he is assigned a job, his subordinates attach great importance to it and can finish it well most of the time. Now, he is my right-hand man.

In fact, the status of this subordinate was not very reliable at first. In more than three years, it should be said that with our joint efforts, he is very active in his work, constantly reflecting on himself and making continuous progress. I also pay great attention to his work style and leadership methods and often praise him. We have not only established a good working relationship, but also cultivated very deep personal feelings.