More than 30 foxes were found in Shuangyashan, Heilongjiang. Are they abandoned or released?

Recently, some citizens found more than 30 artificially bred foxes in Shuangyashan, Heilongjiang. Wildlife conservationists judge that these foxes are farmed artificially and have no wild survival ability. It is very likely that he died because he did not adapt to the external environment, which triggered a heated discussion among netizens. Are they abandoned or released? Considering that foxes belong to the national second-class protected animals, it is obviously impossible to abandon such a large-scale fox. Then, there is only one answer, and it should be released.

When people found these foxes, several of them were seriously injured. Fortunately, it was discovered in time, otherwise the consequences can be imagined. Such a release is tantamount to murder. I don't think it matters whether the discussion is abandoned or released. What matters is our reverence for life. In recent years, people have paid more and more attention to the release of wild animals. Many people advocate releasing wild animals imprisoned by human beings into nature. Although the starting point is good, I feel that if I use the wrong method, I will put the cart before the horse and will not release them in the right way. Such a release is tantamount to murder.

The release of animals is usually regarded as a kind and nature-loving act. However, in recent years, cases of serious imbalance of local ecosystem caused by improper release are common, which makes the management department very headache. Just last month, a citizen of Zhengzhou dumped tens of thousands of koi fish into the Yellow River for some unknown purpose, which almost caused no authentic Yellow River carp in the Yellow River and almost killed the Yellow River ecology. The controversy caused by this release can be said to be a common phenomenon now.

And it happened in recent years because of the release? Commercial distribution? This is also a very serious problem. Maybe, people? Release? The starting point is good, but improper release behavior will not only affect the ecology, but also bring secondary harm to animals. Many people buy wild animals on certain days, which are used by traders with ulterior motives to catch some animals and sell them at a good price on these days, which increases the mortality rate of animal species.

The original intention of releasing animals is to let the captured animals return to their original living environment. After release, at least ensure that animals can survive without human interference, otherwise? Release? Isn't that what it means to kill? People who release people always think that they have saved others, but they never think that releasing people may kill more people. The place of release, the ecology of animals, including food source, environmental adaptation, adaptation after release, etc. All need to be evaluated before release, not because of faith or whim, saying that you want to release it. This release method is relatively negative.

Of course, to solve these problems, we should increase the punishment for illegal release, introduction or smuggling of alien species and abandonment of pets, and even rise to the level of legal sanctions. This is only the first step. More importantly, how to further deepen the concept of ecological protection through life education is a problem that the public must rethink. If the concept of protection cannot penetrate into the concept of life, then severe fines and regulations can effectively protect our ecological environment.