Do judges from higher courts go to grass-roots courts to hear cases?

The judge of the higher court went to the grass-roots court to hear the case. According to relevant information, attachment exercise refers to a temporary attachment behavior that entrusts a specific post to other places for exercise without changing the administrative affiliation of cadres. 1994 The Notice of the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Relevant Issues Concerning Post-attachment Training for Cadres stipulates the whereabouts, posts, procedures and management of post-attachment cadres. Article 72 of the Civil Service Law, revised on 20 18, also continues to retain the relevant provisions on the attachment of civil servants in state organs. When analyzing the attachment of judges, the author is more confused about the current situation than thinking about its impact on the judicial system: attachment exercise is never new, and it is not uncommon for judges to attach themselves to lower courts. According to public reports, as early as 20 13, 29 judges in Inner Mongolia were sent to work for training, among which Wulanchabu Intermediate People's Court arranged them to work for training in grass-roots courts in the name of 12, which should not be the earliest case of judges working for training. In addition, Beijing, Tianjin, Xiamen, Xuzhou, Suzhou, Tongliao, Weihai and other places have reported on-the-job training of judges, and it is obviously not a case that judges of higher courts are on the job in lower courts.