Do you recommend leaders in the recruitment?

It is worth recommending. The remarks in the recruitment publicity are clear and the leadership relationship is clear, which is really worthy of recognition and can effectively help us select better candidates.

First of all, disclosing the leadership relationship of the incumbent provides a clear framework for each recruitment activity, which helps us to more easily screen the most suitable high-performance candidates from hundreds of applicants according to their responsibilities, skills and experience.

Secondly, clarifying the leadership relationship in the recruitment publicity can also effectively solve the obscure problem of the dependence principle, make it easier for candidates to understand the scope and requirements of the positions they are applying for, thus effectively guiding them to complete the recruitment process and choosing more confident candidates to enter the final decision.

Thirdly, clarifying the leadership relationship in recruitment publicity can help candidates better understand the position they are applying for, so as to grasp the advantages and disadvantages of the role itself and attract more suitable candidates in all directions. Generally speaking, it is strongly recommended to clarify the remarks and leadership relationship in the recruitment publicity, which can better help recruiters effectively attract high-performance candidates, better guide candidates to participate in recruitment activities, and finally achieve the purpose of recruitment.

I personally agree with the practice of marking the relationship between recruiters and leaders in recruitment publicity. This allows the public to monitor the transparency of the whole recruitment while ensuring fairness to the greatest extent.