Job Recruitment Website - Recruitment portal - What are the problems in Mayflower Bar?

What are the problems in Mayflower Bar?

Mayflower Bar should be a better bar in Changchun, with daily customers ranging from middle-aged people in their forties to teenagers. Its previous address was Zero Bar, which is also a famous bar in Changchun. At the beginning of the construction of Mayflower Bar, some residents complained that the construction noise was too high, so the bar people gave gifts to these residents, promising that the sound insulation facilities in Mayflower Bar would be good and there would be no problems after the completion. The residents nearby are very satisfied. After the completion of the bar, the sound insulation facilities are slightly stronger than that of Zero Bar, but the nearby residents have no complaints. Because they are used to it, the songs sung by Mayflower Bar are relatively normal. Remember zero? Singing Internationale for several days in a row really makes people collapse. However, the problem of Mayflower Bar still exists. The parking problem of Mayflower is very troublesome, especially for the residents on the first floor. In order to prevent Mayflower customers from parking in front of their own windows, a family put a flowerpot Great Wall on the sidewalk. In addition, Mayflower guests sometimes make a hullabaloo about, and some customers will cry and make a scene when they are in abnormal mood, which is unbearable. Recently, Mayflower Bar has installed a high-power air conditioner, and the noise is even more unbearable. It's persistent and buzzing, which is really annoying. A Mayflower Bar and an Oriental Auto Repair are really a nightmare for the residents nearby, and there is no peace every night. Why do the relevant departments allow them to operate in residential areas? Who will taxpayers' money support? The land of Mayflower Bar, from Changqing Street to Xinjiang Street, from Xikang Hutong to Freedom Road, belongs to the public. It used to belong to the metallurgical department, but now it belongs to the SASAC. So why should the manager of this land rent the land to a nuisance enterprise? Have these so-called leaders ever thought that if you live in such a disturbing environment, can you better "serve the people"? It is hateful to sacrifice the interests of ordinary people for a little land rent.