Suzhou city management apologized for exposing the citizens who traveled in pajamas. Why did the netizens call for it?

Suzhou urban management directly exposed the front photos of people wearing pajamas, infringing on others' portrait rights; The use of face recognition technology exposes the names, identity card information and streets of citizens, infringing on the privacy rights of others; People think it's not a problem to wear pajamas to the streets; The official apology is that everyone thinks that they don't realize their problems at all, which is not sincere enough. So even if they apologized afterwards, netizens still didn't buy it.

Exposing citizens' frontal violation of their portrait rights

In the article of uncivilized behavior, Suzhou City Management directly exposed the positive information of people wearing pajamas, and did not mosaic at all. From a legal point of view, it is undoubtedly an infringement of other people's portrait rights.

Exposing citizens' ID card information infringes on their privacy

Suzhou urban management also uses face recognition technology to expose the names, ID card information and streets of uncivilized citizens. This is a serious mistake in the work, which is said to be negligence in the work. If it is serious, it is an infringement of others' privacy and an illegal act.

It is generally believed that it is not a problem to wear pajamas to the streets.

Although Suzhou Civilization Office has issued? Can't wear pajamas to the streets? However, many people wear pajamas to the streets, and to put it bluntly, these people wear pajamas in winter, and there is no improper behavior, so netizens feel that this practice is simply unacceptable to them.

The official apology is not sincere enough

Although Suzhou City Management issued an apology statement, it only admitted that the content and method were improper, and did not realize that their behavior had involved the legal level. Moreover, the apology statement issued simply didn't realize the impact that his misconduct would bring to these citizens, so it was not accepted by the majority of netizens.

Urban management can promote social development, but everything needs to be measured. If you interfere with citizens' freedom of behavior too much, the effect will be counterproductive. However, Suzhou urban management violated other people's portrait rights and privacy rights without knowing it, and apologized without sincerity. Naturally, everyone would not accept it.