Job Recruitment Website - Recruitment portal - These interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer well.

These interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer well.

These interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer well

These interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer well. During the interview, some professional questions are very important to the interviewer, so it is also important to answer the interview questions. The following interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer well. These interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer. 1

First, introduce yourself

This question is usually the first question at the beginning of an interview. It seems so simple, but it is still difficult to say yes. Self-introduction is easy to talk, which is a big taboo. Try to let the answer end within 2 minutes.

Your answer should include the following four topics: early life, educational background, work background and recent work experience. Emphasis should be placed on the last theme. Remember that this question is usually a warm-up question, and don't waste your most important ideas on it.

second, what do you know about our company?

There is no doubt that HR usually asks this question, so before the interview, you need to get a clear understanding of the company online. Mainly from the interview company's history, corporate culture, business, products and industry image, and the job you are interviewing for should also be understood as appropriate. Tell what you know in the interview, but don't show that you know everything about this company. Don't talk about the company's shortcomings easily unless HR asks you what's wrong with the company or if you know the operation of the company's culture very well.

You can begin to answer the question with this attitude: "During my job search, I have investigated many companies, and your company is one of the companies I am interested in for the following reasons.". Answer this question with a positive attitude, instead of saying, "Everyone tells me that this company is in trouble and there are all kinds of troubles, which is why I am here", that is, that is indeed the reason why you are here.

3. What were the advantages and disadvantages of the last company?

This question, many people will think about saying, I must feel bad about leaving, and then say a lot of bad things about the former company in front of the interview HR. Pay attention, this is the taboo in the taboo.

in the face of this kind of problem, you need to think and tell what you admire about your last company. But the bad places must also be explained, and it is best to avoid subjective factors. At the end, it's best to objectively talk about the advantages of interviewing the company, and add a sentence like "This is exactly what I like about your company" to avoid the deep-water bomb of the company before commenting.

fourth, what can you do for us that others can't?

on this issue, you have the right or obligation to blow your own horn. Talk about some records of your work, mention the uniqueness of your resume, or list your achievements in your career.

tell others that your skills and interests played a great role in obtaining these results and made you valuable. Mention that you can arrange your work priorities reasonably, find out problems, and use your experience and energy to solve problems.

5. What do you find most attractive about this position? What is the least attractive thing for you?

List three or four attractive aspects of this job, and then ask a simple unimportant unattractive question.

Additional supplementary questions

1. What do you hope to get in this job?

to this question, you need to combine your answer with the opportunities offered by this company. Talk about the requirements that you want to show your talents and gain recognition, and let your answer be based on job opportunities rather than personal requirements, which will make HR feel that your needs are suitable for the employees to be recruited by the company.

Second, talk about your definition of the position you are applying for

Before answering questions, you need to clearly understand the job content and room for improvement of this position, and your answer should be concise.

third, do you have any hobbies?

this is a very open question, but it doesn't mean you can answer it at will. Some of your hobbies must have something to do with your work. Please tell me those hobbies. Hobbies such as reading, traveling and so on can also be answered in passing.

fourth, is there anything else you want to ask me?

this question always stumbles the candidates. Is there anything else you need to ask? I have just talked about the main work of the company, my basic situation and my job functions. When you don't know what to ask, you need to ask your questions in order to avoid embarrassment and not to make HR feel that you have nothing to say.

question type 1: the future development of the company's career (in layman's terms, it is the probability and possibility of promotion)

question type 2: working hours, afternoon tea dinner benefits, five insurances and one gold

question type 3: salary range and salary adjustment frequency. These interview questions seem simple but difficult to answer. 2

I once applied for a job, and that was at a time when the specifications were relatively high. I applied to several companies, and four of them were willing to interview me. One of them told me to go at five o'clock in the afternoon, and the interviewer was a woman. The previous interview took a little longer. She was reading my resume when I went in.

"please talk about yourself." I don't think she looked at me much. Her voice was tired and bored.

"What are we talking about?" I asked.

"whatever, something interesting." She said.

my god, what the hell is she asking me? I got it.

The next few minutes were the most painful experience in my interview history. I was completely disorganized and didn't know what to say or what to say. The result of the interview is self-evident.

to make matters worse, even after the interview, I didn't find a good answer. Well, not until I read a book about how to interview. In that book, the problem I encountered was called "killer problem".

so, what's good about this problem? I think the advantage of this question is that the respondents are at a loss and can't grasp the context. It seems that I asked a question, but there is nothing specific. It's like an essay test that doesn't ask questions. It doesn't give the interviewer any help, and the interviewer has to play it himself from beginning to end. This reminds me of the "the legendary swordsman" in which there is no trick to win, which is probably like this.

But what about this question when you meet a well-prepared interviewer? This is a difficult problem.

It's boring to think about it now. Many people are about to become professional interviewers. The level is not high, but I have studied the interview very well and performed it decently. However, relatively speaking, I think it is more difficult to perform this question. Because a good answer to this question should be broad and focused, such a long, speech-like answer, without considerable foundation and preparation, is easy to find the traces of recitation.

so, what kind of answer are we expecting? First of all, we look forward to the interviewer's comprehensive introduction to himself, including strengths and weaknesses; But more importantly, we should observe their performance in the process of answering, such as whether they are flustered, whether the answer is clear and organized, how to hesitate, how to organize, and so on; Also, this question puts a lot of pressure on the interviewer, which can test their performance under pressure.

if the interviewer talks calmly and Kan Kan, I think it is almost certain that he/she is excellent in the above aspects? Unless she/she is fully prepared. Answers that are too fluent and unthinking will make me suspicious and give me the feeling that "I am waiting for you to ask this question".

Everyone should have interviewed many people, and I think you should be able to tell the truth of the interviewer's performance. What I want to suggest to you is that if you have time, you can analyze the advantages and disadvantages of some interview questions, so that there will soon be a group of selected questions, and the purpose of each question is very clear. In this way, before long, everyone will become an interview expert.