Fujian Nanping Pucheng social security inquiry

Because she had dissolved the labor relationship with the company in June+10, 5438, the company had no obligation to pay insurance for her. June 5438+ 10 It is the practice of social security agencies to apply for the next month's insurance, and the company can't solve it. Therefore, the company treated the insurance paid for her in June+10, 5438 as an advance payment, but the industrial injury insurance should not be paid by individuals. This kind of problem is not clearly defined in law. If there is no new receiving company after leaving the company, there is no harm in paying one more month, because if you pay insurance yourself, you still need to pay the part paid by the company, but you can not pay unemployment insurance, but the amount is very small.