It is more cost-effective to pay 60% in the first ten years and% in the second five years for flexible employment.

Dear, I'm glad to serve you: in the past, flexible employees paid 60% social security. Retirement for five years, 70% is cost-effective, definitely better than 60% of social security. If I am a self-employed flexible employee, I can pay more if I can, because the number of social security personal accounts is also very important when I retire! Generally speaking, flexible employees need to pay 60% of the conditions. If you want to pay a higher price, you can limit the conditions! What's the difference between 60% of flexible employment and 70% of retirement? Although there is only one difference between 60% and 70%, the difference in retirement salary is 100-200 yuan, so the more you pay, the more you get, especially the longer you work. For your old age, your old age is guaranteed. In addition, the proportion of pension insurance contributions for flexible employees is 20%, of which 8% goes into personal accounts and 12% goes into social pooling funds. The money in a personal account belongs to personal property, and even if an accident occurs, the insured can inherit it. Moreover, because you have raised the payment base, the accumulation in your personal account and social security fund account will increase compared with before, and the payment index will also rise. So your future pension will increase, and when you give retirees a raise, your increase will also increase. Thank you for your trust. The above is my reply. I hope I can help you and wish you a happy life.