Which is cost effective, self-funded farm insurance or social security?

Legal analysis: self-funded agricultural insurance cost-effective. Self-funded social security and agricultural insurance analysis: 1, the transfer situation, the Social Security Bureau of Volvo Insurance basically every year will be adjusted, while the agricultural insurance rarely adjusted, social security funds in a few years will be more than the agricultural insurance, so the social security more cost-effective; 2, the time to receive, social security to receive funds than the agricultural insurance five years earlier, so the social security more cost-effective than the agricultural insurance; 3, the payment of elasticity, social security lack of flexibility in the payment of contributions, to the time of the provisions of the time you must pay, while the agricultural insurance according to the time of the The economic situation, so this aspect of the agricultural insurance is more cost-effective.

Legal Basis: The Social Insurance Law of the People's Republic of China Article 64 The Social Insurance Fund includes the Basic Pension Insurance Fund, the Basic Medical Insurance Fund, the Labor Injury Insurance Fund, the Unemployment Insurance Fund and the Maternity Insurance Fund. With the exception of the basic medical insurance interception and portability fund and the maternity insurance fund, which are combined and accounted for together, the other social insurance funds are accounted for separately in accordance with the type of social insurance and are accounted for in separate accounts. The social insurance fund implements the State's unified accounting system. Social insurance funds are earmarked for specific purposes, and may not be appropriated or misappropriated by any organization or individual. The basic pension insurance fund gradually implement national coordination, other social insurance funds gradually implement provincial coordination, the specific time and steps prescribed by the State Council.