Work half a month to pay social security

The term "less than a month's work" refers to two situations: one is to work in a unit for less than a month and then leave; the other refers to the employer's new recruits from the date of the start of the work to the first payment cycle (month) before the arrival of less than a month's work. Do you pay social security contributions in these two cases? It is customary to say that of course you have to pay. The reason is that social insurance premiums are paid from the date of employment, firstly, because it is a policy requirement, secondly, because it is a requirement of the social insurance authorities, thirdly, because it is the wish of the individual employee, and fourthly, because this is the way the enterprise has been paying for many years. Is there any doubt about this? However, things are afraid of being more serious. When a worker who has worked for less than a month really asks the employer to pay less than a month's worth of social insurance premiums for him, the unit is in a difficult position; when the employer really wants to start paying for the worker from the day he starts work, the social security organization is ambiguous. It is not that the unit is unwilling to pay, nor is it that the social security organization does not do it, the fundamental reason is that the current social insurance premium collection system and individual account bookkeeping method determines that the social insurance premiums can be collected on a monthly basis, but not on a daily basis. Perhaps you have heard such a statement, but you certainly have not seen such a policy provision. From the policies that have been issued, from the national law, down to the local policy, on the payment of the provisions of the expression is only two categories: First, "contributing units, contributing individuals should pay social insurance premiums in full and on time."; Second, "enterprises to recruit social insurance premiums in full." The second is that "Enterprises shall, after recruiting employees, enter into a labor contract from the date of recruitment and pay the social insurance premiums for the employees in accordance with the relevant state regulations." Take the collection of basic pension insurance premiums as an example. The pension fund is entrusted by the social security agency to the bank to collect on a monthly basis, and after the fund is in place, the social security agency credits individual accounts on a monthly basis for the employees of the contributing units. This monthly collection and crediting system virtually eliminates the possibility of paying contributions for less than one month. The spirit of the policy expressed in the phrase "start paying contributions from the day you start working" is that from the day you start working, you have the obligation to pay social insurance premiums. Therefore, whether from the point of view of regulations and policies or from the operational provisions, units and individuals must pay contributions in full and on time, and it is correct that if you have a job, you should pay contributions, which is the general provision of the policy. But the realization of the contribution is subject to the social insurance premium collection cycle and the principle of record-keeping constraints, it is not want to pay as much as you want to pay as much as you want to pay a few days to pay a few days, this is also the social insurance department to implement the policy of the specific requirements. Then why was it possible to make contributions in this situation in the past? Obviously this is a misunderstanding arising from the lack of understanding of the social insurance contribution business. The reality is that in the process of collecting pension insurance premiums, there cannot be and never has been a case of less than one month's contribution. We know that in general the starting time of someone working in a unit is uncertain, it can be exactly the first day of a month, receiving a full month's salary, so that the current month's contribution is not a problem for the individual employee, for the employer, and for the social security department. But after all, more often than not, the starting time of the work is in a month in the middle of a day. In practice, for people in this situation, its premiums are paid the month or the next month, this is a matter of negotiation between the two sides, there is no hard and fast policy, the social security agency can require is the whole month to pay on the line. Generally speaking, if the employer is a bit more generous or is eager for your arrival, as long as you propose to pay from the date of work, it will make up the amount of contributions from the same month for you, which will not cost you a few dollars. If the employer must pay for you from the next month, the person concerned really do not have to pay for a few days or a dozen days of workdays do not pay the fees for the nagging, on the one hand, this is not contrary to the policy, and on the other hand, it is almost negligible loss of your insurance benefits. Once you really have a dispute with the unit for this, the unit said we want to pay for you from the date of your work, but the social security department can only be collected on a monthly basis, and the personal account can only be recorded on a monthly basis, which is also the regulations, is not to be blamed on me. Then he is right. Therefore, the individual employee and the employer effective communication, coordination is the best channel to solve this kind of problem and the most sensible way, the policy can not make all the problems clear.

Extended reading: insurance how to buy, which is good, hand to teach you to avoid the insurance of these "pits"