Can I still enjoy dividends from land sales in the village when I buy social security and turn it into a resident account?

In many areas, the living security of the farmers who were demolished before was realized through the way that the village collective managed the land to get dividends, but because the village collective could not guarantee that the land management would always be profitable, the welfare of the villagers would never be reduced. Some villages lost money and could not guarantee the livelihood of the farmers who were demolished. In addition, even if the village collective management can maintain profitability, the population is also growing. When the population growth is greater than the profit growth, that is, more and more people want to pay dividends, everyone will get less and less money. In the end, it is impossible to guarantee the livelihood of the farmers who have been demolished.

Therefore, this year's land acquisition and demolition policy proposes that farmers whose collective land has been demolished should be converted into urban residents' accounts. Its original intention is to protect the life of the farmers who have been demolished, and to enjoy social security and medical insurance by changing the nature of household registration and incorporating it into the social security system for urban residents.

To sum up, when the village collective location conditions are not good or poor management, it is beneficial for farmers to choose to transfer households to enjoy social security; However, if the village collective has good location conditions or business prospects, such as being close to universities and large commercial markets, then the dividends of the village collective may be more in line with the interests of farmers. In this case, the villagers can collectively lodge a complaint and propose amendments to the resettlement plan in the land acquisition announcement.

Further reading: How to buy insurance, which is good, and teach you how to avoid these "pits" of insurance.