Drama recruitment network

On July 17, Jackson Yee published a long article in Weibo, responding to the query of "textual research". He admitted that in these silent days, "Jackson Yi" gradually became blurred and lost the most basic "humanity", which made him feel extremely uneasy, both as a public figure and as an individual.

Finally, Jackson Yee said, "After careful consideration, I decided to give up my job at the National Theatre. But if there is an opportunity, I will continue to try to enter the field of drama and improve myself. "

Why did Jackson Yee do this? Jackson Yee gave up the opportunity to join the National Theatre, and I don't know if he was influenced by Hu Xijin. At noon on July 16, Hu Xijin, a well-known network leader, released the Weibo, saying that "in order to completely calm this matter, while retaining Jackson Yi and others to work in the National Theatre, I kindly suggested that Jackson Yi and others take the initiative to consider giving up their career establishment".

In the final analysis, no matter what you do, it's hard for people who don't believe you to change their minds. However, Jackson Yi chose to give up joining the National Theatre, just to prove that he joined the National Theatre on the premise of reasonable compliance and relying on his own technology. It is his own decision not to join, and it is also to avoid taking up more public resources.

It was Jackson Yi's decision to give up entering the National Theatre, and we should respect it. But objectively speaking, as long as the exam is conducted under the principle of fairness, justice and openness, Jackson Yee has no reason to give up-anyone has the right to apply, who can deprive the star of his rights?

In fact, there are three core issues in the dispute over this recruitment event: First, under the background of the epidemic, employment pressure is extremely great, and low-paid but relatively stable jobs such as civil servants and career editors have become fragrant cakes, which will naturally be examined by the public with a magnifying glass.

Second, I am tired of enjoying the career establishment and stabilizing my income while getting high salaries everywhere. Objectively speaking, in the entertainment industry, there are a large number of people in the system, and their non-work duties earn high salaries. Some systems have an appearance fee of tens of millions and an annual income of hundreds of millions-not much credit and not low income. The core of public boredom and opposition is actually dissatisfaction with the income distribution mechanism. Some netizens think that if there is no problem in the recruitment process and it can stand the test, of course, you can join the job, but you must abide by the rules and don't take private jobs.

Third, it calls for fairness, justice and openness, and is extremely dissatisfied with the "black-box operation" in the recruitment process. Objectively speaking, there are still some problems in the recruitment process in some places, such as insufficient information disclosure, opaque procedures and unclear indicators. For example, the recruitment of a college in Shaanxi was "outstanding" by the children of cadres and teachers of the college, and was finally disqualified and re-launched.

In a word, the best way for this kind of recruitment is to release information through various channels, record the whole process for future reference, avoid similar disputes, and fundamentally cut off the problems of "fixing posts by people" and "radish recruitment".