Interviewer asked: Would you choose to stay in a company with only five people?

As a person in the workplace, at a very low point, we will face many choices in the workplace, such as promotion and salary increase, resignation or not. Every choice is very important to us and is likely to affect the future of our workplace. Although resignation is normal for many people in the workplace, every choice of resignation is a crossroads waiting for us to choose left or right. Resignation of employees is a great loss for the company. Similarly, in order to keep losses, the company will do everything possible to let employees stay. The following small series will share an interview with you to see what you think about the choice of resignation.

The first job seeker in the interview was a post-80s, who used to be a salesman and traveled all over the country. Recently, she wants to find a job. The interviewer looked at her resume and asked several professional questions about salary and work. The job seeker's performance is average, but it is reasonable. Finally, the interviewer asked a question: "Would you choose to stay in a company with only five people?" The answer for the post-80s generation is: I don't think I will choose to stay. If a company has only five people, there is basically no development prospect. Let's resign. The interviewer was very dissatisfied with this answer and eliminated him on the spot.

The second person interviewed is a white-collar worker who used to work in a very high office building. He used to have rich work experience and was considered an old hand in the workplace. The interviewer asked several professional understanding questions and professional questions. White-collar workers answered well. Finally, before the end of the interview, the interviewer asked, "Would you like to stay in a company with only five people?" The white-collar worker's answer is: I will never stay. This answer is a typical white-collar thinking, where to make money, where to run. This answer is not very good, but in view of the good performance of the previous link, the interviewer decided to put it off until the next round.

The third job seeker in the interview is the fresh blood and main force in the post-modern workplace in the 1990s. It is said that the post-90 s boss can't do anything about them, so he resigns easily and is very capricious. The question of interview preparation just depends on their views on the future of the company and their attitude towards resignation, so the interviewer will not ask more questions. He just asked: If there were only five people in a company, would you choose to stay?

The young post-90s answered this question: when Ma Yun was unsuccessful, there were only 18 people. Why don't we believe that these five people can also succeed? Truth is often in the hands of a few people, and only a few people's choices can be regarded as future success. I will choose to stay, maybe the company will go public in a few years. The post-90s Great God's answer surprised the interviewer. What do you think of his answer?