Why Martin? Heidegger said that "scientists are the most miserable slaves of our time"?

Technology is a ladder, a vehicle, a road to truth and an elevator to a higher platform.

Further, only by standing high can we see far, and only by broadening our horizons can we reveal everything. If the world is a multi-storey space, a 100-storey building. After you spend all your energy on the exploration on the 50th floor, you begin to describe and summarize, which is philosophical. It is temporarily impossible to explore the world of 5 1 floor. In order to offset anxiety, religion was derived. With the framework and sense of security provided by philosophy and religion, you can multiply stably on the 50 th floor and cycle forever. And science is the elevator to the upper level.

So the old and new versions of a person's thoughts depend on how he views science and philosophy. Theological relationship. People are the sum of all kinds of sensors. Science has expanded the scope and channels of acceptance. Only a high-level telescope can see the farther universe, and only a microscope can see more detailed and tiny creatures. You must observe the phenomenon before you can start thinking. Without science, you always talk about the shadows on the walls in caves.

Science is an excavator to explore the world, a rocket to fly into space and a drilling rig to dig the ground. In the past, philosophers were all scientists. They grasped first-hand information and tried to define the paradigm of something in the world through observation. Now pure philosophers' understanding of the world is second-hand. With the rapid development of science, scientists' theories are updated with each passing day, and their own iteration speed is very fast.

The original human biological brain is almost close to the upper limit of performance. For philosophers who only think with primitive brains, don't they find that their production tools have fallen behind? The field of philosophy is either an old book, or a research topic, a completely unexcited field of concern. Philosophers are like coders who use ancient programming languages to develop projects. In the past, great philosophers also built many wheels and developed many sets of practical tools (theories), leaving a valuable legacy. These heritages should be decompiled and deconstructed, and then compressed into a simplified "knowledge module" through algorithm optimization, so that philosophical theories can become common sense for the public to call and improve the degree of social civilization.

Moreover, individuals despise language as an information expression tool. For example, when you are singing an Amway song in Zhihu, you can directly post a long paragraph of lyrics. For those who haven't heard of it, it's not easy to read the text directly and get to the point. I seldom praise the answer in pure words. While receiving information, a video conveys much more information than simple words, and it is easier for the audience to integrate. As the saying goes: this makes sense, I forgot what I wanted to say. This is also the reason why I like doing MV, which is beside the point of course. Another example is the future with highly developed technology. If I want to tell you a very complicated story, I will show you the surveillance video directly with holographic projection instead of words. More efficient and magical means to kill the memory in my mind in your mind. Deduction is better than literal explanation. Or the "information writing speed" of intuitive experience is greater than theoretical logic.

Philosophy, a way of transmitting wisdom based solely on the language system, is doomed to fall behind in the future. In my opinion, some functions of philosophy are to reflect on and correct mistakes, so that the "dust" raised and blinded by the impetuousness of the whole human race can be settled. Even with the blessing of science and technology, he is still down-to-earth and should not be possessed. Science is the accelerator, philosophy is the steering wheel and brake. Of course, there is no deviation in the direction of progress, and philosophy is useless.

The relationship between philosophy and science is just like the relationship between human beings and AI. The former gave birth to the latter and was constantly surpassed and replaced by the latter. I think Heidegger is still anxious about "what kind of person he should be" because he was in that era. In this era when AlphaGo has defeated Ke Jie, futurists have begun to think about the problem of "not being human". Many people are poking fun at it. The mobile phone is another major organ of human beings, and it will probably be like this in the future.