Why are tigers not suitable for living in Africa?

Survival ability is not comparable to that of leopards, and the success rate of hunting is not comparable to that of lions and hyenas, so it is difficult to survive on grasslands.

In fact, if you carefully feel the data of species, you will find that the state of nature is often only saturated. It means no more, no less, just right. Let me give you an example: lions and cats, but far less flexible than leopards, also live on grasslands. Why is the difference so big? Because the ancestors of lions chose to live in groups at first, it is easier to live in groups, and there is no need to evolve so fast. However, the ancestors of leopards chose to live alone because of their small size and sacrificed their physical strength for agility.

Everything is just right, just like tailor-made clothes, naturally it will not be partial to anyone.

According to this theory, tigers are not as agile as leopards, but they eat more than leopards, and the success rate of hunting is not as good as that of lions and hyenas, so the pressure of living alone is bound to be much greater. If lions and leopards are only saturated, then tigers obviously can't reach perfect saturation and can't survive.

After all, nature has given the tiger the ability to jungle. It is not difficult to adapt to different environments. If you throw the lion into the forest, you may die. And don't say anything about "African roaring tigers". Those two tigers didn't end well. Even if the tiger does well in the documentary, it will be exposed for various reasons after a long time. After all, there are only leopards and cheetahs living alone on the grassland. There is a natural reason why they evolved so thin, just because they are so big that they can't survive unless they imitate lions and choose to live in groups.