Should Yu Gong move or move mountains?

Yugong should move (move mountains) (positive) Yugong should move mountains (negative) Yugong should move (negative) Korea Foreign Studies University (negative): Nantah Thank you, Madam President, ladies and gentlemen. Today, our view is that Yugong should move. As we all know, Yu Gong Yi Shan is based on Liezi. Its first chapter is "The orange in Huainan is bitter orange when it reaches Huaibei", and the second chapter is "Kuafu chasing the sun". Obviously, the original is trying to tell us through these three fables that we can't go against the laws of nature and do things blindly. Gong Yu's spirit is commendable, but the practice is not desirable. We believe that Gong Yu should not move mountains, but move. First, moving mountains destroys nature. Even one or two mudslides brought by the moving mountains in Gong Yu are enough to move Gong Yu to our point of view. Second, moving mountains will have a negative impact on ecology. Remember the classic line: Wukong, you are too naughty, I told you not to throw things around! What can I do if I hit the child? Even if I can't hit the children, it's not good to hit the flowers and plants! Gong Yu moves mountains, but it's not just smashing flowers and plants! Thousands of animals and plants in Qian Qian will lose their homes. And moving can at least save the Tang Priest's nagging. Third, cause losses to others. Yugong moves mountains, but he doesn't talk about it every day. Some people with little education "jumped out to help". It should be noted that "the widows of the capital family have a man's legacy and began to learn." Students, this is the age to learn knowledge! Alas! No wonder even God can't stand it. Fourth, can Gong Yu's descendants be "infinite"? Gong Yu's family moved the mountain. Who reclaimed this land? I don't understand. Can Gong Yu's retirement salary support a family? In addition, such an unreasonable family, the other debater kept praising, are the other four female debaters willing to move mountains in such a family? Even if his descendants find a daughter-in-law, how can they have time to have children? Even if you have a child, where will you get time to take care of it? Even if children grow up, will they be as unreasonable as their parents and grandparents? Instead of leaving an endless burden on future generations, it is better to go to a new world and have fun for generations. Fifth, objectively, it is impossible for Gong Yu to move mountains. It should be noted that "Taihang Mountain, Prince of Wu, 700 Li in Fiona Fang, Wan Ren is high", what is that concept? Roughly speaking, these two mountains have about 23.4 trillion tons of earth and stone. Gong Yu transported soil to "the end of Bohai Sea, the north of Tibetan soil", even if it was once a year, it would take 5,000 years. Scientists tell us that the total life span of the earth is about 1000 billion years, that is to say, when human beings have moved their homes into space and cherished the earth infinitely, Yugong still hasn't destroyed a corner of a mountain! To sum up, moving mountains is time-consuming and laborious, harming others and violating the laws of nature; Moving is economical, efficient, promising and environmentally friendly. Mountain does not turn, water turns, water does not turn, people turn. Faced with these two big mountains, there is no doubt that Gong Yu should move. Thank you (free debate) 1. Zheng Yi: Just now, the other debater said that South Korea has never moved mountains. It seems that the other debater doesn't know enough about Korea! There are many examples of moving mountains and filling the sea in South Korea. On the west coast of Korea, we moved mountains to fill the sea and turned the sea into fertile agricultural land! Counterparty 3: So when you say "three thousand miles of beautiful rivers and mountains", do you mean that your country is "three thousand miles of land is difficult to travel"? Another student thinks this mountain is a difficulty. We know that difficulties are human difficulties and mountains are material entities. How do you explain that "rectifying traffic jams in the north is also a roundabout way out" (applause) Quadrant 4: Please tell me, is the mountain an object? No, the mountain is our great and noble spirit. Counterparty 3: It seems that the opponent debater still doesn't understand what the difficulty is today. We say that the difficulty lies in the inconvenient transportation, but another debater wants Gong Yu and his descendants to carry the burden of moving mountains from generation to generation. Where does the traffic come from? Dear. 3. The opposing debater's point of view seems to make us feel that objective conditions are very important, so we should pay attention to this reality. But Mencius said: "The weather is not as good as the geographical position, and the geographical position is not as good as human harmony." This is to emphasize that objective conditions, no matter how important, are not as important as people's subjective will. Advocating moving is nothing more than giving up basics. "Admiralty is upside down!" (Applause) 2. Pro 3: The basic knowledge of biology is that when the virus invades the human body, once it is overcome, it may form antibodies, which is resistance, but people without antibodies may lead to death! Similarly, you often move around in the face of difficulties to avoid problems. The result is self-evident and unimaginable! Counterparty 1: No wonder another debater was so annoying when he saw this mountain. It turned out that the other debater regarded the mountain as a bacterium. We don't think so. If mountains are bacteria, how can Tao Yuanming "see Nanshan leisurely"? It should be "frowning at bacteria"! Proposition 2: barren land, steep mountains, and big stones everywhere. Who can guarantee that there will be no natural obstacles or difficulties in moving to that place? How can there be a perfect "Peach Blossom Garden" in the world? Counter 2: Yes! Therefore, Gong Yu didn't run away from difficulties when he moved, because he wanted to build his own home in a new place. If Gong Yu moved to escape from the predicament, is the "moving company" "helping people escape from the company"? (Laughter and applause) 3. Counterparty 1: Today, when we discuss whether Gong Yu should move mountains or move houses, we should start with the origin of Gong Yu's moving mountains. We can see that Lao Gong hopes that his descendants will be infinite, but when will his descendants keep digging mountains there? How can future generations be "infinite" if lifelong events are not solved? ! Professor 2: We are arguing from the standpoint of China people. If you don't stand in China's position, let this foolish spirit leave China and go to South Korea! Counter 2: Yes! Our headquarters is in China, so we saw that after Gong Yu moved, he set up his own home in a new place, and he gave up his 90-year lifestyle. This is very difficult and his courage is great! When another student sees the mountain, he will move it. Then the mountain blocks the road and moves the mountain, and the river blocks the road and fills the sea. What should people do if they block the road in Gong Yu? Dear. 3. It seems that the opponent is demonstrating that moving is easier than moving mountains. However, the mountain is a visible obstacle. How should it move? On the way to move, there may be heavy rain, hunger and cold, and bandits! And after moving, there may be acclimatization, language barrier, bad king and tyranny! There will be mountains after moving! Opponent 1: The opponent debater made another mistake. If we meet bandits on the way to move again, we will definitely pick up guns and hit them, but we won't think those two innocent mountains are bandits! 2005-12-0313: 53:14 Weibei Huairen-Reading: 3 10 rematch The first debate: The mountain should be moved/the party should be moved: the class team in Grade Two (19) opposed it. Let me talk about our views from the following four aspects. Gong Yu faced up to the difficulties in life, did not avoid the contradictions in reality, and set out from reality. Moving is a typical mistake to avoid contradictions. It is selfish to treat the symptoms rather than the root cause. To put it bluntly, it is metaphysics. However, the development history of human society is precisely a history of constantly moving mountains. Without the courage of predecessors to face difficulties and the spirit of contemporary pioneers to face difficulties, how can productivity progress and society develop forward? Today, in the face of various contradictions in life, we should face them squarely, expose them and never take detours. Gong Yu chose to move mountains and face the contradiction. This not only solves the problem of "wandering in and out", but also provides a broader development space for hometown. Moving can only make my hometown poorer, closed, backward and ignorant, let alone develop. From the philosophical point of view, Gong Yu's "Moving Mountains One by One" is the embodiment of quantitative change. And we know that quantitative change is the premise of qualitative change. When the quantitative change of things reaches a certain level, qualitative change will inevitably occur. It can be seen that fools are not stupid, and it is also a long and tortuous process for us to move towards productism. In this way, what the other debater needs to explain is, can we step into the capitalist society and omit the struggle in the middle? The spirit of perseverance and unremitting struggle demonstrated by Gong Yu Yishan has always been the main body of the Chinese national spirit. The wheel of history passes by in a hurry, always recording the truth in it. In the last two centuries, our motherland is in danger of being invaded by foreign enemies, and our country will not be a country. If there were not countless people like Gong Yu, and if Gong Yu's spirit of moving mountains has always inspired the people of China, I'm afraid we would have become a conquered nation. Students, if the skin doesn't exist, the hair will attach. If the country no longer exists, there will be no personal happiness. Can we still sit here and participate in the debate? At any time, the foolish old man moving mountains is an act that should be praised and respected. I believe that in the future study and life, the other debater will join us and prove this truth with countless actions. In other words, Yu Gong should move mountains. Thank you all. On the other hand, Wang Rui thought from the beginning that today's debate actually gave Gong Yu two choices, but it reflected the choice of two ways of thinking at a deeper level. One way, Gong Yu led future generations to dig stones and haul earth, move mountains and fill the sea. Another way is to emigrate to a new style and move the whole family to build their homes. Where to go? We have the same idea as another debater, but in a different way. Both of us have the determination and will to persevere and overcome difficulties, but it is neither realistic nor scientific for the other debater to choose to move mountains, and our view is to move mountains. This is a new kind of thinking, which embodies the scientific spirit of the Chinese nation to seek change and development in response to change. I will elaborate our views from the following aspects. First of all, the human spirit is important, but it can't be exaggerated unilaterally and infinitely, which goes against the laws of nature. The stupidity of a stupid person lies in ignoring objective conditions and laws. Let generations move mountains, not to mention what future generations eat. More importantly, moving mountains and filling the sea will destroy the natural ecology of mountains and seas. The relationship between man and nature is not the relationship between the transformation and transformation of conquest and conquest at all. Nature does not belong to man, man belongs to nature, and man and nature should live in harmony. Secondly, we know that there are many kinds of problems, and some have only one solution, so we have no choice. Others have many methods, just like the problems faced by Gong Yu. So should we choose the scientific method? Thirdly, whether moving or moving mountains, its ultimate goal is to better communicate with the outside world. Since solving the same problem, we should choose a realistic and feasible method. Imagine how many generations such a mountain has to be moved, and life is only once for everyone. Should this once-only life be used to move mountains? If it takes Gong Yu time to move mountains, how much earth can he carry? Such a waste of people and money, it is better to proceed from reality, constantly break the solidification of closure, and create openness and mobility is where historical progress lies. To sum up, on the one hand, moving mountains is futile. On the one hand, moving gets twice the result with half the effort. On the one hand, it is the hard work and sweat of moving mountains, on the other hand, it is the wisdom and courage of moving. On the one hand, it is helpless to close the mountain village, on the other hand, it is wonderful outside. Where to go, I believe you will make wise choices. Huo Wenjia, opposing the other side's four arguments, concludes: First of all, human progress can only be achieved through movement. When we came down from the tree, we became upright people. When we moved out of the cave, people began to cut and burn. When we walked out of the closed and backward mountain village, we began to bid farewell to the small-scale peasant economy and move towards industrial civilization. Movement is the ladder of progress. Secondly, action is to break the closed and rigid thinking mode and advocate the thinking mode of combining efficacy. It also means the rational flow of people, materials and information. These are also a solid foundation for developing market economy and building modern civilization. Third, moving is to seek progress in harmony, and people can be educated in heaven and earth. Zhong Ling, as everything, should live in harmony with nature. Take things with goodwill. If, as another debater said, we break ground and dig around because of detours, it will not destroy the ecology. "Hundreds of mountains have no birds, and thousands of paths have no footprints"? Moreover, the act of moving mountains embodies the old idea that man is the master of all things, which has brought great disasters to mankind. 1988 The number one news person in the world selected by Time magazine in the United States is actually our scarred earth. Comparing the two, which is higher or lower. Fourthly, Gong Yu's action embodies the innovative consciousness, breaks the traditional concept of staying on the land before moving, and faces the world with an open mind. Fifth, Yu Gong's touch also shows his kindness. Through migration, thousands of animals and plants in Qian Qian can be protected from harm. Finally, Gong Yu's actions showed his enthusiasm for progress and courage to challenge himself. The 90-year-old stupid old man will rebuild his home under another sky. He really dares to be the first in the world. To sum up, Gong Yu's move concentrated the scientific spirit of the Chinese nation's pragmatic pursuit of strain and the enterprising spirit of coping with strain. Have you noticed that Pan Geng's move to the capital in the Yin Dynasty broke through many obstacles, turned the tide, and led a generation of coquettish? Don't you see, the Han and Tang nationalities merged and became a big country. Have you noticed that in modern times, Chinese sons and daughters have made great achievements in the world? Looking at the present, China is open and communicative, which is the melody of the times, the need of the times and the moving thinking. As the saying goes, if you are poor, you will change, and if you change, you will be too long. Only by being pragmatic and guided by the situation can we break the old and create new glories. Thank you. Nie Yong, the fourth debater, summed up the statement: First of all, I want to point out some mistakes made by another debater. First, another debater just talked about the method, saying that it is really wise for Gong Yu to move mountains with time and effort, while moving is easy to avoid difficulties. However, this does not solve the fundamental problem. What we are talking about is a method to fundamentally solve the problem and change the philosophical quantity into qualitative change. Second, I don't understand how long it will take to move the mountain and how difficult the work is. If we are all afraid in the face of difficulties, then the modernization of China needs the efforts of several generations, and the difficulties and obstacles are too great. Should we give up? Gong Yu moved mountains, on the basis of facing up to contradictions, and made contributions to changing the backward appearance of his hometown. In the process of moving mountains, it has a great spiritual effect. The spirit of moving mountains has played a great role in promoting the development of the Chinese nation. Throughout history, the Chinese nation has experienced many crises. In this do or die, it is this spirit of struggle and persistence that has maintained the survival of the nation and changed its destiny. Chairman Mao warmly praised the spirit of the foolish old man in the article "The foolish old man moves mountains". Its spirit inspires people to overthrow the three mountains and build a new China. History and people will never forget that "learning from fools to move mountains and build a beautiful motherland" resounded through the land of China in the 1960s, which greatly promoted the socialist construction of the motherland at that time! Without the spirit of foolish old man moving mountains, there would be no motherland today, and without the spirit of foolish old man moving mountains, we would have no bright future. Today, in the process of socialist modernization, we will inevitably encounter many difficulties. Faced with these problems, should we just avoid them, as other debaters have said? Isn't such a big western China a no-man's land? In today's society, corruption is prevalent, and immoral behaviors such as gambling are temporarily exaggerated. Faced with these problems, should we ignore them and let the social atmosphere continue to deteriorate? The answers to these questions are all negative. Everyone in China will not be indifferent to these problems. Only when we are stupid enough to move mountains and rivers, not afraid of difficulties and stick to the end can we solve these problems and have a bright future. Now my speech is coming to an end and the whole debate has come to an end, but we still have a long way to go. When we encounter difficulties, the audience and other debaters present will face these problems with us and solve them with the spirit and boldness of a fool moving mountains. After conquering the high mountains, we will have a bright and beautiful tomorrow. It takes only a few days to move a mountain, and it takes decades to dig a mountain, so we can know which is more time-saving. Time is life. < 2 > moving is conducive to the growth of future generations. In ancient times, Meng Mu moved three times to create a good learning atmosphere for future generations. How can we increase our knowledge < 3 > moving is conducive to improving one's viability. Without any skills, what should you do if you rely on mountains to eat mountains? Only by learning new living skills to adapt to < 4 > moving can you start over. After moving to a strange place, you can re-establish your image and erase your former self. No one knows about your past.