20 16 can self-employed people immigrate to Australia?

In the 457 employer-sponsored visa, the deadline for self-employment is 201511021. This means that the way to set up a new company in Australia and use the new company to guarantee their immigration has become history!

On 20 15, 165438+ 10, 2 1, the Australian Immigration Bureau revised the guiding policy for the 457 visa. One of the most striking changes is to stop the independent application for the 457 visa! This is a blow to some foreigners who are gearing up to start a business in Australia and then guarantee immigration through self-employment!

The purpose of the 457 visa is to enable Australian enterprises to recruit employees from overseas to fill vacancies when they cannot find suitable employees from Australian citizens. It does not exist to establish business for non-Australian citizens and ensure their immigration; There are other visa channels to handle immigration applications in this area.

Many people regard self-employment on the 457 visa as a shortcut to obtain immigration qualification. Under the New Deal, self-employment has not only not been abolished, but if employees are related to employers, they may not be guaranteed.

As we all know, the Immigration Bureau will be very alert to your "immigration tendency" when examining visa applications.

Once you are identified by the Immigration Bureau as having an immigration tendency, your application will be rejected by KO immediately, and you may even be blacklisted.

Therefore, for applicants with 457 visas, the Immigration Bureau also said, "In the future, we think that your main purpose is immigration, so we will not agree!"

The nominee is a distant relative or close neighbor of the senior management of the guarantee company;

The nominee is the owner or manager of the guarantee company;

The nominee is in Australia and holds a 4 17 visa;

The salary level of the nominee is inconsistent with the industry (such as being seriously lower than the general level of the industry);

The company pointed out that nominees paid money to buy nomination qualifications from them;

The nominee pointed out that the company charged him a re-guarantee fee.