Can dinosaurs talk like people?

First of all (about speaking, wait a minute), I think the dinosaur "Gao Wenming" should be untenable.

The development of a civilization (without the influence of "external forces") is progressing step by step, and it is stumbling and bumpy. It can't be developed at once. Let me assume that this statement is correct. Then, during the N billion years when dinosaurs ruled the earth, why did they move towards civilization and start scientific and technological research?

We humans, in primitive times, are different from other creatures. We have flexible limbs, which can be used to master and make tools. Because of the reality that the forest is decreasing, they went to the earth and straightened up. It is precisely because of this that we have the opportunity to master fire, people's productivity has improved and their lives have improved, so we have stepped into the line of ideological development and human scientific and technological civilization has emerged (there are other reasons, such as people can speak, books have appeared, and other knowledge may be ignored, please forgive me)

What about successful dinosaurs? In that ancient and fiery dinosaur era, their bulky bodies and body structures (part of them) determined their flexibility to some extent. Unified claws and short arms limit their manipulation of tools. Ancient times was a revolutionary era of life, a cruel knockout, and dinosaurs were the winners. But compared with the later modern advanced life, their evolution still has some defects (although they have many advantages, they are all finished products of military route).

If some dinosaurs broke the rules and used tools, they developed like humans. Hehe, in that bloody environment, Sven is easy to become extinct. Of course, it is possible to emigrate underground, but as far as the earth at that time is concerned, it is extremely difficult to successfully live underground and successfully develop high civilization (but this idea cannot be ruled out because there are too many unexpected things for human beings).

But all the above are judged under the premise of conventional thinking about tool manipulation. Some dinosaurs manipulated objects with their minds for the first time. How to judge at this time? Still impossible, no matter how weak the mind is, it needs the support of energy (energy can't disappear or appear out of thin air, energy keeps balance! ), to survive, the mind must be strong enough, then the supply of food is the problem. I will give them another chance because they have enough energy. Then, the development of science and technology also consumes energy to develop other aspects, not just food. Our science and technology are mainly developed with fossil energy, most of which comes from the eternal burial of ancient skin grafting. In other words, dinosaurs can't enjoy such "fossil treatment" unless they had a life time before! ! ! ! ! I don't think the "pre-dragon civilization" exists. It is impossible to use a lot of plants and the environment can't survive. So it is impossible for dinosaurs to develop high technology.

Here, I want to make it clear that I have ruled out the intervention of alien life. Alien life is a variable. If the intervention of alien life does exist, then this dinosaur "Gao Wenming" is a bit possible, but at that time, "dinosaur" is no longer a "dinosaur".

To sum up briefly, I personally think that the argument that dinosaurs were destroyed by nuclear war should be ruled out (with a probability of 99.99%), and the probability of dinosaur civilization is 5%.

So did dinosaurs talk like people? In combination with the above, I personally think that most dinosaurs can talk, but the realm of "barking" is not as changeable (but full of emotion) as people say, and very few are moving towards the realm of "talking". There should be individuals who can talk, not groups. The communication between dinosaurs should not be based on "talking".

I don't know if you've seen it, but I think it's ok to stick to it.

This is all my answer to your question. Please comment more.