Does it constitute a crime to continue to receive subsidies after the accidental death of immigrants? What is Rugao's situation?

If the amount reaches a large standard, it shall be deemed as a crime and punished as fraud. First of all, it should be recognized that it has the purpose of illegal possession, because the aided person knows that he is dead and no longer enjoys the relevant subsidies, but he still continues to receive the money, which obviously has the purpose of appropriation, and this kind of possession is illegal. Secondly, concealing the truth is fabricating facts, that is, concealing the truth that people are dead and fabricating the illusion that people are still alive. Therefore, as long as the amount reaches a large standard, it should be considered as fraud.