Tsinghua's Dr. Wang Jinwen's article is very sharp and speaks everyone's mind. If the law is not observed, then the law is just a piece of waste paper. I hope there will be more Wang Jin.

An open letter from lawyer Wang Jiabo, postdoctoral fellow in political science and doctor of philosophy, to Tsinghua University Wang Jinwen.

Master Wang Jinwen:

Hello!

First of all, please forgive my intrusion when you kidnapped Tsinghua, kidnapped doctors, kidnapped laws, kidnapped public opinion and kidnapped networks to launch a fierce battle to safeguard private rights. The reason why you didn't use the honorific words of "respect" like at the beginning of the open letter to the mayor of Weifang is because, as far as education is concerned, you are a master and I am a doctor. As far as experience is concerned, I entered Jilin University 10 years earlier than you. My brother Zhong Xian and my sister cutie are your teachers, and I am your uncle. When you were studying for a master's degree in Tsinghua, I taught in Tsinghua as an expert, as if I were a teacher and a student. In terms of age, I am almost forty years old and belong to you uncles. There should be a difference between young people and old people. As far as legal knowledge is concerned, I have been a lawyer for more than ten years. Although you have studied law for more than ten years, you still failed the national judicial examination. It's hard to say that your legal knowledge is superb. Therefore, before I make an objective, fair and accurate evaluation of your moral knowledge, I think the word "hello" is more polite and appropriate because of literary customs and etiquette. Calling you a classmate is not a classmate that your illiterate admirers understand (the previous letter said that your academic ability is the same, and your fans think that I write other words like you, depending on what cultural level worships you), but a teacher's polite address to the students.

At the beginning of your open letter to the mayor of Weifang, the governor of Shandong and even Premier the State Council, there is an obvious language defect that even primary school students can see, that is, "I worked in a government department", and the standard Chinese should be "I worked in a government department" or "I worked (or served) in a government department". This low-level mistake seems to be inconsistent with your self-proclaimed "doctor" degree. And you are just an employee of the legal publishing house, which is a public institution and a non-governmental department. Although you have repeatedly boasted to villagers, relatives and friends that you are a middle-level official working in the State Council, saying that the Prime Minister went to Tsinghua to choose three students, such as you, and President Xiao Yang of the Supreme Court also wanted you, you don't want to go. Although your mother Li Yumin has repeatedly told the village cadres that "Xiaowen is a middle-level official, you should always ask him questions and report on your work", this is an illusion and imagination. Judging from the following article "I am also receiving doctoral education" and the title of the letter "Doctor of Law", "We just don't have quality!" "In fact, their performance is worthy of this sentence. I think it will be more harmonious to communicate with you." This language lacks transition, and the preface is not necessarily related to the latter. Since you said at the beginning that you knew nothing about the mayor, here you think it would be more harmonious to communicate with him, which is contradictory. "I don't know you, and I have never had anything to do with you, just like the president and I are alumni, but the relationship is just like you and me." This language is suspected of showing off the relationship with the president's alumni to the mayor, governor, prime minister and others. I want to know what your intention is. Can you tell me "teach me something"? If you show off your relationship with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon as a citizen of a neighboring country, and have the same name and surname, and you and US President Barack Obama are villagers in the global village, you may cause an international sensation, which may have a greater impact than kidnapping the president. After all, China and the President must act according to the law. You can't ask the mayor, the governor or the prime minister just because you are an alumnus. Although you said to the villagers, "My father-in-law is a lieutenant general, and my girlfriend is a CPC cadre of the Ministry of Agriculture; My home is Zhuangyuan Building, a treasure trove of geomantic omen, and it will become a place of interest in the future! " But you are just an ordinary citizen. You also admit that "I have been away from home for ten years and studied in Beijing, not a common people under your rule". Although "my parents and people in the village live in the administrative area where you are responsible", from the perspective of administrative management and administrative litigation, you are not qualified to be the subject of administrative actions and litigation. As a Beijing citizen, why do you criticize the mayor of Weifang with big words on the Internet? "I and the villagers who entrusted me are not begging you, but asking you to serve their rights with the power given to you by the voters." Which villagers entrusted you? The village has demolished 527 households and 526 households. Who did you accept? Are you a lawyer? It is a violation of the Lawyers Law and related regulations for those who do not have the qualification of lawyers or grassroots legal service workers to provide legal services. Claiming to be a customer rather than a customer seems to be suspected of kidnapping public opinion. "I have no intention or ability to be the chairman of the agricultural movement or the leader of the workers' movement", which seems too arrogant. In fact, you just represent the self-interest of your family. How can this behavior of safeguarding private rights be compared with the revolutionary movement led by the older generation of revolutionaries? Improper metaphor, lack of self-knowledge. The revolutionary predecessors risked their lives to launch the workers and peasants movement in order to liberate the working people of the world, and you are defending private property rights! "Joining the rights movement is a very noble cause", which is too absolute, depending on what rights you are defending. If you defend the people's public rights like the revolutionary predecessors, it is indeed noble; But you are defending the private rights of the family, so it is hard to say that it is noble. "In this way, let me see what is Weifang-style gentle sweeping". Can your family represent the whole city of Weifang? Summarize the personal situation as Weifang style is suspected. Would it be more effective to label it "Chinese style", kidnap public opinion and create a sensational effect? "There are even firecrackers, and a certain group is celebrating the victory." According to the media and many villagers, the "so-and-so group" is 526 of the 527 villagers in the village! The minority is subordinate to the majority and the opinions of the masses must be respected. This is the consistent policy of the party and the government. "I can hear fear from the phone call from the villager." This villager should be your father, right? Why not just call him "my dad"? At that time, only your family had not signed the demolition agreement, and other villagers were not bored enough to call you an irrelevant person. "165438+1On the evening of October 2, all the glass in my house was smashed, and no one was responsible. Of course, I was in Beijing, but I didn't see it with my own eyes. What I heard may be different. What you read between the lines is "I didn't see it with my own eyes", "I heard it" and "I heard it". As a law student, you should make sure that the evidence is conclusive and sufficient.

As a doctoral student, you should know that Fudan University is not a doctor but a doctoral student with a master's or bachelor's degree. "I know I won't make mistakes without legal basis", as a law student, this is not valid, because the Land Management Law, the Regulations on House Demolition and the relevant provincial and municipal normative documents on which the local government's demolition behavior is based, how can you say that there is no legal basis? "If all this is done by unidentified people, based on the current administrative responsibility and division of labor, then you are responsible for defending the land." The local public security department should be responsible, and the mayor cannot be meticulous. "After all, my vote doesn't decide anything." Jin Wen's classmate made another mistake. At the beginning of the letter, he said that he was not a common people in Changzhi, Weifang. Where did you get the right to vote? What did you vote for? "So what's the difference between Weifang's public security and living environment and bandit areas?" Excuse me, do you agree that Weifang, the state of etiquette, is a bandit area,120,000 Weifang people? "So far, my family and I have not seen the demolition agreement, the forced demolition notice, the developer, any written documents or any written announcement with a seal higher than the village level." This statement is too unrealistic. As a student of law, you should know that the demolition agreement is generally signed by the village collective on behalf of the villagers with the developers and relevant departments, and it is impossible to sign with the villagers one by one. Demolition notices and notices have been published on the municipal government website for a long time, but you turn a blind eye and think that there is no such thing, which seems to be inconsistent with your personality and self-proclaimed doctorate. "It is reported that the accounts here are chaotic as much as 1 100 million yuan." Your whole article is "said", "heard" and "heard", and your writing is too imprecise. People who study law should speak out, not what they hear. "Yihuang, which caused national outrage, was demolished from Fen less than a month ago". What are you doing at this time? According to eyewitnesses, you were in front of Ziqingge with a woman (not the "Deputy Department of Agriculture"). Why don't you get angry and go online? Because it's none of our business, it's the traditional values of China people. Although you call yourself "doctor of law", you can't expect too much from you.

"In 20 10, Weifang judges demanded bribes and were humiliated, and a child killing incident spread all over the country occurred in Weifang." What is the inevitable connection between this matter and your house demolition? I am so stupid, I hope my classmates can show the teachers the mystery! "Nothing is lacking", you seem to be showing off your knowledge. As a modern person, writing words with this uncommon old saying seems to show your knowledge, but it makes people feel that painting a tiger is not a dog, neither fish nor fowl, just like swallowing a fly. "According to the current laws in People's Republic of China (PRC), these should be made public voluntarily, and bargaining can be discussed and face-to-face consultation is needed." As a student of law, we should understand that the formulation of laws and regulations by the government is an abstract administrative act, and it is not negotiable for relevant departments to implement administrative acts according to law. The Land Management Law stipulates that the state has the right of land ownership and land expropriation, and the Demolition Regulations give the government the right of administrative compulsory demolition. Those who illegally resist demolition shall be investigated for legal responsibility.

"I personally studied law for ten years and decided to take law as my career. I can't convince myself to accept such a demolition decision. " Just now I mentioned that I didn't see any notices and documents, and now I say that I can't accept such a demolition decision. Where did you see and know the demolition decision? The "alleged" below needs your investigation and verification, otherwise it may be suspected of libel. "I'm sorry I can't prove this statement." As I said just now, whoever advocates giving evidence violates this law without taking half a step. It is very inappropriate for you to openly use rumors that are not confirmed by evidence and witnesses.

"We don't want to see the containment of the kite club and surprise AIA; I don't want to see the government office building besieged and stop pedestrians; I don't want to see a city with high-rise buildings, but there are still millions of villagers who have no land and no tiles-they have no social security, no pension, no citizens, just farmers without land. " It seems that you want to incite your family to oppose the government in this way, which may violate the public security administration punishment law and the demolition regulations. Law students don't believe in the law, don't obey the law, don't pass the law, but advocate, brew and plan to use violence, which seems to be contrary to your education. It can be said that your law education for more than ten years is a complete failure. "If you don't know, you have a responsibility", which is really a show-off. The use of notional words here is meaningless and irrelevant. I advise you to change it to "duty-bound" You may just look it up in the dictionary and learn the word before writing a letter, that is, use it flexibly, which is commendable, but not recommended. "Participants should understand criminal law" is often wrong and not smooth. What do you mean? Does it mean that participants should be punished according to the open criminal law, or that participants should be clear about criminal law and other laws? As a master of literature, I can't understand your own words as a master of law. As others can imagine, it is a kind of sadness. I suggest you learn from a middle school student in Jiangsu who wrote a composition in classical Chinese for the college entrance examination. If you write this letter in classical Chinese, it is estimated that it will be more inspiring and more miraculous. The idiom "harmony with light and dust" is used here, which is quite different from the meaning of going with the flow and drifting with the flow. It seems to show your knowledge. "If the demolition is fair, no villagers will take this way to defend their rights". Students only "heard" one side, but not the other. Some unruly people fake divorce for a house that occupies a large number of demolition collectives, make guns and ammunition to confront the government, or build houses and build walls at night, or become nail houses to resist demolition. This kind of absolute thinking needs you to summarize, either one or the other.

There are so many violent demolition incidents in China, bullet demolition notices in Inner Mongolia, self-immolation protests, jumping off buildings and refusing demolition. What are you doing? Have you written to the relevant departments out of the conscience of a legal person? Have you ever made angry remarks in the news media? It is said that you are chatting with someone in Ziguang Building and drinking in a restaurant outside the East Gate (not your "Lieutenant General" prospective father-in-law). Since you have "as an intellectual, as long as one person in the whole world is not free, you are not free." With the heart of the world, why did you become a bystander and an outsider at this time? So some people in Tsinghua call you "the scum of Tsinghua" and Weifang calls you "the shame of Weifang", which is not unreasonable. "Good words and no deeds will damage the famous national ship". Uncle Shi, please explain what a national famous ship is. In ancient Chinese, it refers to the tripod of the country, but there is no such word in modern Chinese. "With the deafening firecrackers of bulldozers and the tears of villagers", how did you see the tears of villagers in Beijing at this time? Imagined or heard? Where did the tears come from when the villagers set off firecrackers? Are you extremely happy and sad, or do you "cry" in your letter? "The villagers' choice of petitioning, litigation and legal channels represents their trust in our country, government and law. This is also where I can comfort myself as a legal learner and worker. " Even villagers can choose legal channels. Why don't people who claim to be doctors of law choose legal channels? "Car bombs and tear gas ... two bodies, five steps of blood", so you incite violence. In this era of peaceful development, it seems to be discordant and criminal. Our party's political security work is very strict, and you have no chance to stab Qin with Jing Ke. "At present, the problems existing in China are not something you can solve, but the problems that occur in your jurisdiction can be properly handled by you." At the beginning of the letter, it is clearly written that "it can be understood as a letter to the governor of Shandong or even a higher administrative head (prime minister)", and this word is not only the mayor of Weifang, but the governor of Shandong and Premier the State Council. If the governor and the prime minister can't solve it, how can you solve the problems reflected in your posters? "You should deliberately misrepresent the facts-don't kill people, this is the minimum morality", which is really different from your so-called "one centimeter sovereignty". It is the first duty of soldiers and police to obey orders. As long as the political subjects they serve are not corrupt, the orders they execute are legal, and it is illegal to deliberately fail to execute them. Your original intention is to encourage the military and police dictatorship in China, and learn from the German police's deliberate violation of the laws and regulations of the party and the government and connivance of anti-government behavior like yours? Suspected of violating the relevant provisions of the constitutional law and criminal law. After I die, even if the flood is terrible. You compare the present government of China to the tyranny of French Louis XIV, which is not comparable and seems inappropriate. "Mr. Jiang Ping, a highly respected legal person, can only shout loudly about the current legal environment." As a legal person, you didn't speak up when there were so many bloodshed caused by demolitions all over the country. Only when their own interests are harmed, they get angry, kidnap public opinion, forge titles and defend their private property rights to the death, attracting many netizens who don't know the truth. The public opinion pointed directly at the party and the government and succeeded. As many netizens said, you kidnapped the internet and public opinion just to get more compensation from the government. It can be seen from your fictitious telephone number of 654.38+0.38 million yuan that your asking price is just so. Netizens asked you to publish this phone number, but they looked it up and you couldn't provide it. Housing prices in Weifang are not comparable to those in Beijing. You can buy a Siping house in Weifang 1.38 million, but you can't buy a decent house in Beijing. So, I heard from your primary school classmates on the Internet that you asked the government for 3 million yuan and wanted to buy a house in Beijing, but the government sternly refused. If you break this example, the 526 villagers who were demolished will not agree. Under the leadership of street cadres, they donated more than 10 thousand yuan for you after you were admitted to graduate school. But I didn't expect that you would finally let them move back indefinitely regardless of their interests. It's also nonsense for the government to give you taxpayer money. Shameless, I didn't expect you to be here! No wonder villagers and cadres say you are ungrateful. Even your second uncle Li Yushun, the cousin of the village party secretary Li Jianhua, is angry that you don't know them because of your personal interests. "If Wang Jinwen enters Beilisan again, he will break your leg!" So, you are riding a tiger, and you are on pins and needles, shooting yourself in the foot. Although you lied to the staff sent by your hometown government that you had sold the old house to the students of the General Political Department, and deliberately wrote the "recipient" in the self-made agreement as "recipient" in an attempt to induce the staff to sign a legally binding compensation agreement, you were exposed and seen through by the staff, and even the leaders of Tsinghua Law School criticized you for reneging on your word and fabricating lies. Mr Banqiao's "Ya Zhai Lie Listening to Zhu" is suspected to be the voice of the people's sufferings. Some small officials in Caozhou County always care about their feelings. "It embodies Weifang's tradition of harmony between the government and the people since ancient times. Historically, there were few peasant uprisings in Weifang. Only in the Tang Dynasty did women in Tang Saier rise up and lead the people against the corrupt national government and the evil Japanese invaders. Among so many violent demolition incidents in China, Shandong Province is relatively good, and there are almost no similar incidents. But in your pen, it has become a feat of rivers of blood and villagers' riots. If you are asked to write local chronicles, it is really bad. History is expensive, reality is expensive, and future generations will scold you to death.

"The mill is just a rumor, and I didn't see it myself." You have to understand, unlike China, the quality of German citizens is several times higher than that of you and your family, so the middle class is in absolute strength. Your old house can't compare with Santan reflecting the moon, and your father, a migrant worker, can't compare with Mr. Lu Xun. So your "house was built firmly at the beginning and can be used for 50 years", and there is no need to become a cultural relic. It can't be compared with the German mill. Weifang officials, after all, are not feudal kings, and they can enter if they can. "Five months after the formal submission of the application for information disclosure through legal means, although some departments such as the Municipal Development and Reform Commission gave positive answers, the rest were all sinking into the sea." The NDRC and other departments have already given an answer. What other information do you need? The attitude of some officials in Weifang "greatly influenced your predetermined image in my mind". What is the direct relationship with the mayor of Weifang? If there is any relationship, it should be related to its superior Shandong Provincial Governor and Premier the State Council. Why not go straight to the source and seize a mayor who is neither a signatory of laws and regulations, nor an abstract administrative act, nor a specific administrative act? In Shi Shu's view, Jin Wen's students should write directly to the Prime Minister, President and Premier the State Council, because all laws and regulations are promulgated and implemented after signing, and all state administrative officials are under their jurisdiction.

"As a civilian, I have fulfilled my civic responsibility. Everything I have done is to voice and appeal to let more people know the injustice and injustice that has happened; As for the result after the appeal, it may be worse, it may be better, and it may be hard to say; What I can do is to try my best to let as many media, networks and government agencies know about it as possible. " This kind of discourse disease has been committed again. There is an obvious language barrier to "knowing in ...", which should be "let the media, network and government agencies know as much as possible." How did you learn it when you were at Jida Law School? Although you are a junior college student, you can't even use such simple Chinese grammar. By the way, whose interest is it that you "do your civic duty and make an appeal"? Between the lines and what you have done in the past, it seems that you are only defending your own interests and are suspected of selfishness. After all, as you said, China society is experiencing one violent and bloody demolition event after another. Why do you only appeal and shout for yourself and ignore others? The ancients also had the idea of "worrying about the world first, and enjoying the world later", not to mention today's "doctor of law". What you said is not exaggerated, and there is no suspicion of slander, but many of them are exaggerated through hearsay, and none of them are conclusive evidence. How can such words and deeds not be exaggerated or suspected of slander? "After studying law for nearly ten years, I hope and constantly call for non-violent ways to resolve social hostility, promote the gradual democratic development of the country, implement the concept of the rule of law, and be cautiously optimistic about the future of the country. However, your behavior is just the opposite of my efforts and expectations. I even doubt whether Weifang under your rule is going to commemorate the Revolution of 1911 by creating it. Do you want to learn to be Mr. Zhongshan? It's a pity that your moral quality is different from that of Dr. Sun Yat-sen in Wan Li. Dr. Sun Yat-sen led the Revolution of 1911 in order to liberate the suffering people in the world, expel the Tatars and restore China. And in order to protect the privacy of your family, you incited netizens who didn't know the truth to start riots. In my opinion, if the majority of netizens knew the truth, they would not be kidnapped by you for no reason in the chariot against the government to safeguard your private rights. At that time, the people on trial for treason will not be the mayor of Weifang, the governor of Shandong and Premier the State Council, but your classmates. " I can choose to go abroad, I can emigrate, I can vote with my feet, I can use materials, I can get a high salary, and I can go with the flow. "Since you have so many choices, why don't you stick to your own selfish interests? You once boasted to your cousin that your monthly salary was tens of thousands, but why did you do whatever it takes to get more compensation than other villagers? Even threatened to send letters of protest in domestic and foreign media such as the United States and Taiwan Province Province? I'm afraid foreign students with such strong anti-government sentiment will not accept them. You won't take in a self-righteous person with such poor knowledge of law and literature, will you? You won't take in a student who eats a meal from the China government and gets a grant from the China government, but you will berate the China government, will you? If you continue to go your own way, then your hands are definitely not qualified to vote. As for whether your feet can vote, it depends on whether your behavior violates the criminal law. " I will never give up my family, house and rights. "This sentence tells your heart. You should put this core and fundamental sentence at the beginning of an open letter, or make a title. You believe in the creed of "Every man for himself, and the devil takes the hindmost", but you have repeatedly quoted the case of the Revolution of 1911, saying that "you should live and die for yourself, not escape from every cloud has a silver lining", which is really a disgrace to the spirit of the seventy-two martyrs in Huanghuagang. Don't say that you are a part-time bachelor and a master in Tsinghua, both universities will be ashamed because of you! At the end of the letter, the conclusion of the ancients was used, but the format was wrong. The ancients were vertical books. Even if modern people archaize the language, they should pay attention to the format. The word Wen Qi should be in the last four words of ode.

This is a tribute.

Zhu An (Wen Qi)

Lawyer Wang Jiabo, postdoctoral fellow in political science, doctor of philosophy.

At 20 10 12 15.

Tsinghua school was repaired for several days after the fire.

A few days after the Shanghai fire was properly handled

60 years after the suppression of unrest in New China, 2 1 year after the suppression of unrest.