Luo Qiulin's Work Performance

1,1In July, 999, Liu sued her father-in-law on behalf of her first daughter-in-law with leukemia. After nearly a year of litigation, she recovered more than 50,000 yuan in compensation for Liu (see the front page of Hengyang Radio and Television News 20065438+0 February 14 for details).

2. In July, 2000, the labor dispute case of car driver Yang v. Hengyang Gong * * Transportation Corporation was tried twice by the court, and ended with the cancellation of the bus company's delisting decision. Defended the legitimate rights and interests of vulnerable groups of workers, and the case was reported by dozens of media all over the country (for details, please refer to the column +0 of CCTV's Legal Report on February 23, 2006).

In March, 20001year, he represented the first high school student in Hunan province to sue the school for illegal expulsion. In the case of acting high school student Tan Mou v. Hengshan No.4 Middle School for illegal expulsion, Hengshan No.4 Middle School took the initiative to compensate Tan Mou for his economic loss18,000 yuan and revoked the expulsion decision. CCTV Oriental Time and Space reported the case.

4.5438 June +2003 10, acting as the first sexual harassment case of minors in Hunan province. As an agent of a school in Hengnan County, during the litigation, he keenly discovered the evidence of the intentional planting behavior of the parents of the students, and confirmed that the sexually transmitted diseases of the students were infected by their mothers. Finally, Hengnan County People's Court rejected the plaintiff's claim according to law, and Hengyang Evening News reported the case.

5. On February 5th, 2006, the typical "Longevity" case of 65438+65438, 1995/year was represented by Mou Guihua. "1 1 year! Almost across an era. " It is said that some responsible judges have retired and some have passed away. The case was finally settled by mediation in the City Intermediate People's Court, and the two sides shook hands and made peace. China Youth Daily reported the case.

6. China Telecom's service platform, Internet Star, has seen a large number of pornographic movies, which is also one of the main voting websites of a talent show being broadcast by Hunan Satellite TV. On June 1 1, 2007, Mr. Qiao of Hengyang, Hunan Province discovered this situation when reinstalling the computer system. The website display can be viewed for a fee. Therefore, on the afternoon of 19, attorney Joe filed a civil lawsuit with the people's court of Shigu District, Hengyang City. Hengyang Intermediate People's Court finally confirmed that the telecom company violated the principle of "public order and good customs" and confirmed Mr. Qiao's public interest. The case was reported by many media, and the telecommunications company immediately rectified the content of "involving pornography" and the relevant stakeholders were punished.

7. From June 5 to1October 38, 2007, Luo Qiulin, Mo Binbin, Ling Shoubo and Tan Zaixian Legal Aid Center provided a lawyer in his 70s with free assistance for three years. Hengyang Intermediate People's Court made a final judgment this month, and awarded a county legal aid center a compensation of 30,000 yuan, which opened the first case of Hengyang lawyer as an expert!

8. On June 30, 2007, 165438+ represented Li of Hengyang Steel Pipe Group Co., Ltd. in a labor dispute with a company in Shandong, and Hengyang Intermediate People's Court made a final judgment on the case of 500,000 yuan of high-priced labor job-hopping, supporting Hengyang Steel Pipe Group Co., Ltd. to claim more than 500,000 yuan from a company in Shandong and Li. 1, 200 1 On July 9, he represented the first village official in Hunan Province who refused to accept the dismissal of the township government. In this case, the entrusted agent of Jiang Shilin, director of Tang Ye Village, Yin Tian Town, Changning City, chose an appropriate starting point after collecting enough evidence, and filed a lawsuit with the People's Court of Changning City, which opened on June 9, 20001year. This case was reported by Southern Weekend and other media on June 5438+ 10/0, 2002, and was discussed as a special topic at the Fifth Session of the Ninth CPPCC, which promoted the democratic construction of grass-roots political power.

2. In 2002, he acted as the agent for the first administrative lawsuit of inland river liability determination in Hunan Province, and acted as the agent for the shipowner Liang Moumou to sue Hengyang Port and Shipping Supervision Institute for illegal liability determination. On May 15, 2003, the Higher People's Court of Hunan Province made a final judgment and revoked its responsibility determination. Xiaoxiang morning herald once reported this case.

3. In 2002, he represented Liao Moumou and others, employees of Qinren Hydropower Station in Changning City. He sued Changning City Public Security Bureau for retaliation against informants and complainants. Hengyang Intermediate People's Court ruled that the inaction of Changning Public Security Bureau was illegal, thus protecting the plaintiff from the defendant's retaliation and providing a good way for the whistleblower to defend his rights. The focus column in Shi Jing, Hunan Province reported this case.

4. On April 1 2005, because Hengyang Public Security Bureau did not arrange for lawyers to meet with clients in time, my lawyer's right to meet was violated, and an administrative reconsideration was filed with Hengyang Municipal People's Government according to law. Hengyang Municipal People's Government found that Hengyang Municipal Public Security Bureau violated the right of lawyers to meet, and this case became the first successful case in China to safeguard the right of lawyers to meet through quasi-judicial procedures. The case was reported by the Legal Morning Post, China Youth Daily and other media, and was also included in the list of lawyers by some media, and was listed as one of the top ten candidate news events of the rule of law in 2005 by Hunan Rule of Law Network.

5. On April 3, 2006, Jiang Shilin sued Changning Finance Bureau for abusing taxpayers' money to buy a car illegally, which was reported by CCTV.

6. On May 12, 2006, Luo Qiulin applied to Hengyang SASAC to disclose the shares of individual citizens in state-owned assets. After being rejected, he filed a lawsuit with Hengyang Intermediate People's Court on June 2.

7. On the morning of June 13, 2006, as a specially authorized agent of a company in Hengyang, I received the administrative judgment of the Intermediate People's Court of Hengyang City, Hunan Province, and the final judgment of a company in Hengyang v. zhengxiang district Branch of Hengyang Public Security Bureau for refusing to accept administrative seizure and state compensation. The judgments all adopt the opinion that the behavior of the public security organs in this case is a specific administrative act, not a criminal judicial act. It was judged that the branch abused criminal compulsory measures in violation of the law and was liable for compensation. The case started from June 5438+065438+ 10, 2004, and we can finally see the result of winning the case with joy. Then, we apply for enforcement, so that the sub-branch can realize the legal responsibility that should be borne for debt collection for others.

On the afternoon of June 2, 2006, lawyer Zou Anguo of Hengyang Legal Aid Center provided assistance to Li Deyi, 66, and went to Hengyang Railway Public Security Bureau to ask for confirmation of illegal detention and state compensation. The reason is that in May 2006, Li Deyi found the 19 mineral water bottle on the train, which was discovered by the police of Hengyang Railway Public Security Bureau. He immediately demanded and made a punishment decision on the same day, and was detained for five days for violating the provisions of Article 23, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment. The office sent Li Deyi to the detention center on the same day. On June 20th, Li Deyi came to Tian Ge Law Firm and hired Luo Qiulin as his lawyer. After xiaoxiang morning herald's attorney Luo reported the case, Hengyang Railway Public Security Bureau apologized to Li Lao and paid more than 3,600 yuan.

9. On April 9, 2007, Luo Qiulin, Luo Wanli and Luo Chun, the "three lawyers", filed an administrative lawsuit with the Shigu District People's Court of Hengyang City on the non-disclosure of administrative information of Hengyang Construction Bureau. The case caused an uproar, and many city leaders expressed great concern about the case after the prosecution. Later, Hengyang Construction Bureau gave us the required administrative information, and the administrative information of the administrative organ could be prosecuted if it was not made public, which gave the administrative organ a "sober agent". Subsequently, the prosecution was withdrawn.

On the morning of March 5, 2008 10, Ms. Liu, the entrusted agent, submitted an application for state compensation to the People's Procuratorate of Huaxin District of Hengyang City by express mail, and started the legal procedures for state compensation. On March 1 1, 2008, the People's Procuratorate of Huaxin District received an application for a lawyer. The leaders and case handlers of the hospital thought that the facts stated in the application were correct and the request was reasonable, and the procuratorate had made mistakes in detaining Ms. Liu. Eliminate the influence within three days, restore Ms. Liu's reputation, and actively compensate Ms. Liu for her losses and correct the illegally detained money.

On the morning of March 14, 2008 10, a delegation from the People's Procuratorate of Huaxin District of Hengyang City went to Ms. Liu's unit to eliminate the adverse effects caused by criminal detention. At the same time, correct the wrong decision made in the Decision on Cancellation of Cases (ZJZ (2007) No.03), and seize the cash of 50,000 yuan paid by Ms. Liu when she was released on bail pending trial as illegal money, turn it over to the finance and return it. At the same time, compensate for the loss of being detained for seven days.

On April 29th, 2008, 13, as the agent of lawyer Tan of Hunan Southern Law Firm, filed an administrative lawsuit against Shigu Branch of Hengyang Public Security Bureau on the grounds of violating the lawyer's right to meet. After the lawsuit ended, our bureau agreed to arrange a meeting with lawyer Tan immediately, and the purpose of the lawsuit was achieved. Later, Tan withdrew the lawsuit against the bureau.

14, 2008 1 1.3, lawyer Luo Qiulin applied for the disclosure of administrative information against the inaction of 27 township people's governments in Hengnan County. After being rejected, he sued the people's court of Hengnan County for administrative omission of 27 township people's governments.

15. On April 7, 2009, Kuang filed a state compensation lawsuit with Hengyang Intermediate People's Court. On September 4, 2009, Hengyang Intermediate People's Court paid Kuang compensation of180,000 yuan. 1.In July, 2000, he served as the defense lawyer in the case that Li, deputy director of a bureau in leiyang city, was accused of taking bribes by the procuratorate. Deputy Director Li was acquitted the day before the Mid-Autumn Festival in 2000 after providing a legal opinion that did not constitute a crime to the procuratorate.

2.200 1 July, all members of the leading group of a bureau in Hengshan county were accused of abusing their powers by the Hengshan county procuratorate. After serving as the lawyer of Wang, the chairman of the trade union of the bureau, in the investigation stage, the court provided the Hengshan County Procuratorate with a legal opinion that did not constitute a crime in time, and the case was withdrawn.

3.200 1 65438 On February 5th, he served as the defender of the eighth defendant in the case of "Zhang Fei and Yao Qi" listed by the Ministry of Public Security.

4. In June, 2003, 65438+1October, 65438+July participated in the defense of the case of "Seven Brothers of Qu Family" stealing financial institutions in Hunan Province.

5. On June 9, 2003, a minor student, Xie Mou, served as an appointed defense lawyer in the case of being accused of robbery by the procuratorate, and put forward an innocent defense opinion to the Hengnan County People's Court. In the same year, the defendant was exempted from criminal punishment and was released in July 17.

6. In August 2003, after serving as a lawyer in the case of Liao accused of corruption in a bureau of Hengnan County and submitting a legal opinion to the People's Procuratorate of Hengnan County, the court made a decision not to prosecute.

7. From June 5, 2003 to1October 27, 2003, he served as Liu's defense lawyer in the first bribery case of lawyers in Hunan Province, and pleaded not guilty in this case.

8. On June 5438+February 65438+February 3, 2003, he served as the appointed defense lawyer in the case that Luo was accused of theft by Hengnan County People's Procuratorate. After accepting the case, he provided the court with notarized evidence that the defendant was under 16 years old. On the 24th of the same month, the People's Procuratorate of Hengnan County withdrew the prosecution. On July 7th, 2004/KLOC-0, Luo was acquitted.

9. On May 24, 2004, he served as Deng's defender in the "2.5" robbery case accused by Hengyang Municipal People's Procuratorate, and made a defense for mitigating punishment, which was supported by the court.

/10 2004 was appointed by Hengyang Intermediate People's Court on September 7, 2004 as the appointed defense lawyer for Chen Mou's intentional homicide case accused by Hengyang People's Procuratorate. On September 27th, 2004, he pleaded not guilty in court. On March 25th, 2005, Hengyang Intermediate People's Court acquitted Chen Mou.

11.In March, 2005, he was appointed by Hengyang Intermediate People's Court as the first and second trial defense lawyer of Li Chunsheng, who was accused of intentional homicide by Hengyang People's Procuratorate and called "murderous maniac" by the press. The case was ruled by the Hunan Higher People's Court on June 23, 2005, and only Li Chunsheng was found to have killed five people, but seven counts of homicide could not be established.

12, 2006165438+127 October, entrusted by Liu, acted as the defender of Liu in the first and second instance in the case that the People's Procuratorate of Yanfeng District of Hengyang accused Hengyang Housing Provident Fund Management Center, Liu and other units of accepting bribes and Cai Xiang Securities of bribing the unit. My defense in this case is innocent, but the court still sentenced my client to one year and six months' imprisonment, suspended for two years.

13, June 2007 14, entrusted by the deputy procurator-general of a county people's procuratorate, served as the defender of the case that he was accused by the public prosecution agency of leaking state secrets. On the 29th-three days before the trial, he pleaded not guilty to the court on the grounds that the procuratorate could not prove that the contents of the indictment belonged to state secrets, and the procuratorate withdrew the prosecution. A prosecutor general withdrew the prosecution on July 2 1. On June 5438+1October 65438+March, 2008, the People's Procuratorate of zhengxiang district, Hengyang City made a decision not to prosecute (Xiang Jian Zheng Zhong Zi (2008)No. 16) and decided not to prosecute the deputy attorney general.

14, 2008165438+128 October, provided free help to the youth Kuang in Qidong who was sentenced to six years' imprisonment, and pleaded not guilty. Qidong County People's Court acquitted him of robbery. On April 7, 2009, Kuang filed a state compensation lawsuit with Hengyang Intermediate People's Court, and on September 4, 2009, Hengyang Intermediate People's Court paid Kuang compensation of 6.5438+0.8 million yuan.