Why is Norway rich?

Norway Denmark Finland Switzerland Sweden Why are they so developed?

First of all, they are just rich. If they are developed, they are really far worse than Beishangguang.

Norway is the richest, mainly because of its abundant material resources, inexhaustible oil, water and electricity, cheaper electricity price than domestic ones, inexhaustible electrolytic aluminum, which consumes the most electricity, and inexhaustible RMB exported to the EU, so there are still many hydropower resources that are idle and deliberately not developed. Needless to say, oil exports rank third in the world all the year round, and sometimes second. The population is still small, the national population is less than 5 million, which is not as big as an economically developed county in China. A county in China has such good natural resources and is equally rich.

Finland and Sweden are both heavy industries, with developed industries, small population and close to the rich European market. These are advantages. In addition, Sweden has an inexhaustible supply of high-quality iron ore. Switzerland is engaged in finance and tourism, which is the most profitable industry in the world. The man who does it is rich. Luxembourg is also engaged in finance and is equally rich. Denmark has good geographical advantages and advanced technology, engaged in biopharmaceuticals, aquaculture, modern agriculture and wind power generation. With rich neighbors like Germany, the Netherlands and Norway, it is difficult to be poor.

One of the successful experiences of the four Nordic countries is that the left-wing parties are in power, which, in our words, is to engage in socialism and eat the same pot. They also have our shortcomings, such as not working hard, fooling around, and so on. But the difference between them and us is that they don't engage in bureaucracy and attach importance to education and technology. Most importantly, fortunately, the ancestors suffered a lot, and modern generations occupied a treasure land.

Why is Norway so rich?

The social system here is fair and the welfare is high, so people here don't have to work hard for a living, and they are generally highly educated, because Norwegians can go back to university even at the age of 30, and the level of education largely determines a nation's creativity. A stress-free life allows them to put their time and energy into creativity.

What I said above used to be poor ... actually, it's not so exaggerated, at least it's better than most parts of China now, but now it's richer.

But to be honest, I feel that Norwegians are all slow and unhurried, and sometimes dealing with them is really annoying.

Why is Norway so rich?

The population is small, and the per capita natural and social resources are abundant.

Why are Norwegians so rich?

Mainly welfare. All right. Ordinary people there are rich, but not many. There are many lazy people.

Obviously Norway is the richest, why did you vote that Norway is the poorest?

Probably because I haven't heard of it.

Why are the five Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Iceland) so rich, even richer than Britain, America, Germany, France and Japan?

Norway is the largest oil producer in western Europe, and more than 99% of its oil exports come from Norway. The problem of resources cannot be confined to traditional resources. Do you think water conservancy, wind energy and geothermal energy are resources? Norway is rich in water resources, because of the great difference in highlands. It is the country with the largest utilization of hydropower and geothermal resources in the world! Sweden's manufacturing industry and communication technology hardware smelting industry are world-class. Without Ericsson, there would be no American e2 early warning aircraft and no current mobile phone. The Ohio class submarine of the United States is the largest single submarine in the world. How to build it? Have you eaten an omelet? It's a whole piece of iron rolled up! This edge banding machine is only available in Sweden, and the United States rents it from Sweden! ! ! You are not mistaken about renting a house! ! ! Sweden should have all kinds of grudges with Russia, referring to China and Japan, but what's more, Sweden didn't rent it to Russia, so there is no large single submarine in Russia so far! As for metal smelting, there is no one. Sweden is the best in the world, even better than Germany! Education in Sweden is also famous. Lin Xueping University Town and the Royal Swedish Academy of Science are top engineering schools! Therefore, the Nordic countries are managers of technology export banks, so it is not surprising that small money can make big money.

Why is Luxembourg the richest country in the world?

Switzerland's per capita wealth 1 Switzerland 64824 1 2 Denmark 5751383Sweden 5134244USA 5 126 12 5 Germany 496447 6 Japan 49324/kloc-. 30808Norway 4737089France 468024 10 Belgium/Luxemburg 45 17 14 Ranked Countries Per Capita Wealth 1 Ethiopia19652Nigeria 27483Burundi 28594Congo 3514. During the 60th UN Summit, the World Bank published a report of 190, which put forward new standards according to the conditions of GDP, output capital, natural resources, human technology and capacity. According to this new standard, the report also ranks the wealth of all countries in the world, especially the top ten richest countries and the top ten poorest countries. Switzerland ranks first among rich countries with a per capita wealth of US$ 648,246,5438+US$ 0,000. The second and third places are also arranged by two Nordic countries: Denmark (US$ 575,654,38+US$ 0.38 million) and Sweden (US$ 565,438+US$ 0.3424 million). The United States ($496,447) ranked fourth and fifth respectively. Among the poorest countries, sub-Saharan African countries almost include the top ten poorest countries. Ethiopia ($65,438+$0,965) came last, followed by Burundi ($2,859), Niger ($3,695), Nepal ($3,802) and Guinea-Bissau ($3,974). According to the report, the per capita wealth of China in 2000 was 9,387 dollars, including 4,208 dollars of intangible assets, 2,956 dollars of output capital and 2,223 dollars of natural resources. This amount is 200 dollars more than in the past. Chinese mainland's real savings rate is 25.5%, Hong Kong's is 2 1.4%, and the United States is only 8.2%. China ranks second, after Haiti, which ranks 1. In contrast, Japan's per capita wealth is $493,200, South Korea's 14 10000, Russia's $38,700, and India's per capita wealth is $6,820. According to the traditional standards currently adopted by various countries, the main indicator for judging a country's financial resources is undoubtedly gross domestic product (GDP), that is, the sum of the values of all goods produced and all services provided by a country or region in a certain period of time. However, experts pointed out that this calculation method ignores the problems of resource consumption and environmental damage, which is not conducive to the sustainable development of the country. In the report published by the World Bank, several other contents have been added to the standard of rich and poor: output capital, natural resources, human technology and ability. Steiner, director-general of the German-born World Conservation Union (I-UCN), said, "The new wealth standard is to show the world the part of sustainable development hidden by traditional evaluation methods, so that we can better promote countries to formulate scientific plans for long-term development." Regarding this evaluation method, Kolk Hamilton, chief environmental economist of the World Bank, explained that whether economic development conforms to long-term interests is the main consideration of experts. Hamilton said, "If a family only withdraws money from a bank account every month, or sells cars, livestock and other property to get enough food, then we don't think this family can sustain for a long time. The same is true of the wealth of a country. If their net savings are negative, then this will give us a signal that the country's wealth remedies will be exhausted and its development path will be unsustainable. " Experts also concluded that the development model of most poor countries is difficult to sustain for a long time. For example, in some of the poorest countries in sub-Saharan Africa, if the factors such as depletion of natural resources and rapid population expansion are deducted from the net savings, the per capita net savings of most countries are negative. The survey results show that the per capita wealth of Switzerland, the richest country in the world, is far from that of Ethiopia, the poorest country, and the gap between the rich and the poor in the world continues to widen. Switzerland's per capita wealth is $648,246,5438+0,000. ......

Why are the scientific and technological strength and military strength of some developed countries so weak? For example (Norway, Denmark)

Because the standards of developed countries do not include military power.

Norway has only 30,000 soldiers. Why didn't anyone invade

Because the ideological values of these western European countries are similar to those of Britain and America for a long time! Has reached the legal management-there is no big contradiction-

During the Cold War, facing the Soviet Union's 5.5 million, the United States has provided an umbrella for everyone. Since 1964, the whole army has been mechanized and armored. The result of having 30 thousand regular troops is almost the same as that of having 300 thousand regular troops!

So the burden on these countries is not very heavy! Simply doing it is enough to maintain domestic stability and undertake some simple tasks of NATO! What's more, they don't need more troops because they don't have the top-level complex magnetic field as powerful as the Soviet Union and Russia. ...

Britain was once the most powerful country in the world. Up to now, all kinds of actual combat experience are more than that of the United States! Faced with this reality, we have to reduce the size of the army ~ because the gap with the top two is too big! It's too big. If you put all your income into it or quadruple it, you can't reach that level!

Why are Nordic countries so rich?

It has little or no relationship with politics and history. Because the productivity of northern Europe was underdeveloped in the era of great navigation, it remained neutral in both world wars They did not plunder resources or participate in imperialist annexation.

The main reason is that the Nordic countries are rich in natural resources, with low population density, and geographically far away from the developed areas of science and technology. They rely on exporting a large number of minerals, oil, timber, fisheries and animal husbandry to western developed countries as the pillars of the national economy.

Take Sweden as an example. 450,000 square kilometers of land, 9 million people, and population density of 20 people/square kilometer, which is110 of western European countries. Iron ore reserves are 3.65 billion tons, ranking third in Europe after Russia and Ukraine. The forest coverage rate is 54%, and there are abundant wood and water resources. There are famous fishing grounds along the Baltic Sea. Countries such as Denmark and Norway also rely on the nearby North Sea oil field.

In addition, they remained neutral in the world war, so they were basically not devastated by the war. Social and economic stability, 1948 Stockholm hosted the Olympic Games, the post-war reconstruction era of the world, 1958 Sweden hosted the World Cup during the recovery of the world economy. Join the European Economic Community (EU) for foreign trade.