Which countries are divided by India?

India has more than 300 nationalities and is a typical multi-ethnic country. India is a relatively democratic country. India covers an area of 3 million square kilometers, and its population has now reached 1 1 billion. This is a country with a large population and a vast area. A big country that belongs to the standard. India was once a British colony. Although it was a colony, the British did not immigrate to India. So far, on the contrary, India has a large number of immigrants in Britain. From the actual situation, Britain can basically be said to be a colony of India. Of course, from the perspective of this new colony, Indian colonies are all over the world. India split once. After Britain withdrew from the Indian subcontinent, India split into two, and one inherited the name of India, which is now India. One of them was established under a new name, which is now Pakistan. There is an Indus River in Pakistan. Old India was divided into two countries according to religious beliefs. Old Indians mainly believe in two religions, Hinduism and Islam. Where Hinduism has a relatively large population, it will be distributed to India. Distribute it to Pakistan with a large Islamic population. This divided old India into two countries. New India is in the middle, forming a whole. Pakistan is on both sides, not connected with each other. After more than 20 years, Pakistan split again with the help of new India. The part to the west of Pakistan inherited the name of Pakistan. East Pakistan has a new country name, which is now Bangladesh. It can be seen that old India has been divided twice in just a few decades. There is no division of India. This old India, with an area of 4 million square kilometers and a population of 654.38+0.5 billion, is the most populous in the world. The ethnic composition of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka is interesting today. You have me and I have you. Usually a nation belongs to two or more countries. First, the interference of caste system. I think this is the most important point. Most people in New India believe in Hinduism. Hinduism allows caste system. The caste system interferes with the internal cohesion of all ethnic groups in India, and the caste system greatly weakens the internal cohesion of all ethnic groups. This kind of strong interference is extremely unfavorable to national unity and resistance to foreign forces during foreign aggression. This is an important reason why India has been occupied by foreign forces many times. But in new India, the caste system is still beneficial. The great weakening of national cohesion has also weakened the desire and ability of all ethnic groups to be independent or split from each other. This is the most important reason why India has not continued to split. Can the same ethnic group in India belong to different castes? I guess so. I didn't see this explanation clearly. It can be said that India's national concept is very different from other countries. I suggest that you don't take India, a so-called multi-ethnic country, as an example, where the main ethnic group does not have an absolute advantage, and you don't have to split. It is estimated that it is a relatively minor reason. For example, India is ethnically mixed. This has also weakened the forces that may divide all ethnic groups. It is estimated that there is another more important factor, the religious factor. The same nation in India believes in different religions, which also greatly weakens the motivation of national unity. Weakened the ability of ethnic groups to split. Hindus and Muslims live together. This has also weakened the potential separatist ability and motivation in various parts of India. India is not without separatist forces. In the northeast corner of India, there lived a yellow race. The population here is very different from that in other parts of India. Some people here may be fighting for independence. Some people say that democratic countries will not split. This shouldn't mean much. Democracies can also split. There are facts and potential examples. For example, Britain has experienced many divisions. The split between Britain and Ireland should be regarded as the split of democratic countries! I wonder if Britain's separation from Canada, Australia and New Zealand is a division of democratic countries. Potential examples, such as the French population in Quebec, Canada, want independence. Of course, other democratic countries also have some independence movements. I give these examples mainly to show that democratic countries are not indivisible. Democratic countries and non-democratic countries are the same on whether they can split, and both have the possibility of splitting, and the probability of splitting is basically the same. The probability of a country splitting is determined by other factors. This shows that the new India has not continued to split, not because of India's democratic system, but because of its own special factors.