Recently, the central government issued a policy that naked officials cannot be employed. Why?

It is a kind of "presumption of guilt" to stipulate that "naked officials" shall not hold the post of party and government chief. On the one hand, can it be said that all "naked officials" are corrupt officials and are likely to flee? The answer is obviouslyno. Besides, some returnees whose families are already abroad can't work full-time? On the other hand, if you are not allowed to be the chief of the party and government, is there no possibility of corruption for deputy and even ordinary staff? It is not difficult to see that "naked officials" do not necessarily constitute an inevitable causal relationship with corruption and flight. But in fact, when this rule came out, it was praised by everyone. Why? In fact, if this provision is implemented well, it will inevitably allow officials to publicize the relevant information of their family members within the party and government. With propaganda, supervision within the party and government can be formed. Compared with the previous non-disclosure, it can even be a little more open and transparent, which is the reason for public praise. Therefore, to put it bluntly, the highlight of this regulation is not the preventive effect of "naked officials" not being allowed to take up their posts, but the power of information openness and transparency, which is also the fundamental way to control the flight of "naked officials". Therefore, in this sense, there is absolutely no need to stipulate that "naked officials" are not employed. What they really rely on is information disclosure and daily supervision mechanism. Everything has a development process from quantitative change to qualitative change, and it is impossible to change suddenly. For those "naked officials" who really have the idea of fleeing, actually emigrating their families abroad is a signal in itself. Where does the huge cost of immigration come from? What is the purpose of immigration? These can be used as the basis for supervision and supervision. From one aspect, it is actually a second-best regulation for the lack of supervision that "naked officials" are not allowed to hold full-time positions. The ultimate solution is to make information public and strengthen supervision.