According to Darwin's theory of evolution, the reproduction of species

Update 1: I don't agree that we can't take humans as an example, because the evolution of species in the theory of evolutio

According to Darwin's theory of evolution, the reproduction of species

Update 1: I don't agree that we can't take humans as an example, because the evolution of species in the theory of evolution includes humans.

Update 2: All species is a good idea, but it raises questions. If the path of fertility is cut off from the strong and the fertility of the weak becomes the source of the next generation, then the development of species will tend to be worse and worse. Please discuss this inference and criticize it.

Update 3: Excellence is hard to define. Yes, plumbers, electricians and cooks can survive because they are the fittest. They are in foreign countries, and foreigners need to find someone to adjust hoses, pull wires and try Chinese food, so they adapt to the environment. Compared with a lawyer with a high social status, it suddenly becomes useless because of the different laws in the two places. Not suitable for the return of social environment.

Evolution is called success, and the whole group is successful.

It doesn't mean that one person succeeds. The definition behind it is

When DNA is successfully passed on to the next generation,

The more copies, the more successful. Choose single people.

Only dna will disappear with his death.

Not that [individuals] failed. mankind

Even all mankind still has children.

So [species] also failed. According to Darwin's theory of evolution, a good species group can breed the next generation, and others will be eliminated. This sentence should be true.

There is a premise: first, make sure that good and bad species can be separated. If there is no difference,

It cannot be established. Extreme nationalists.

For example, advocating eugenics as Chytra.

Only the [quality nation] in his mind is allowed to survive.

Other [lower ethnic groups] will be put to death.

The premise of eugenics is that there are differences in dna between different races. In fact, there is no evidence that there are differences in DNA between different races.

In the end, a nation is higher than D and a nation is lower than D. However, most people in the family believe that there is little difference in dna between nations.

Too little to tell the difference. Most people are individuals.

Except for people with obvious genetic diseases on the left

You can't tell the difference. What the landlord said is just the opposite of what Chytra did.

It's a group of people who voluntarily give up having children. Other people's dna will replace dna and multiply in the whole human race. If you don't like eugenics, suppose someone is taller.

Not as good as someone.

He didn't have you.

In this way, all human dna will be different in the future. therefore

This species has failed.

And [deciding not to have children] has neither dna nor loss. So: Do these people who choose to be single have to marry or have children with a boyfriend or girlfriend anyway? No, unless people D make up the majority of the population, they are barren.

The total population will drop.

And affect genetic diversity [geic diversity]

In addition, it affects human heterosis and gene diversity.

This is not a question of evolution. People who are born or not will always be a minority in the population.

therefore

It is really so-called that all mankind will not have children. Personal feelings in the family: D people are not married and have children.

Many times it is because I don't want to bear it.

Want to live a free and happy life

Or have no confidence in social prospects.

I don't think D's children will live an ideal life in the future. Humans are always interdependent animals. When a d person fails to give birth to the next generation.

Excess of existing resources

We should help others and their descendants, such as adopting orphans.

Take part in voluntary work

Donating money is more important than ... human beings as a whole. 2009-06-23 15:39:03 Supplement: Sorry.

I have no time to ask the landlord today. Strong/weak/superior/inferior can't be defined.

What I mean on the answer sheet.

Except for a few people who have been confirmed to have genetic diseases.

No one else is. therefore

If the path of fertility is cut off on the strong, the fertility of the weak will become the source of the next generation. It's like Chen is not born.

Li Jisheng

In the future, the name of Mido D will be Lori. I don't know whether the whole ethnic group is good left/bad left. 2009-06-2315: 47: 01supplement: However,

There is always a difference in fertility rate between countries/nations. There are two largest populations in the world: between China and India.

China has family planning.

Every couple has one [or two] children.

In India, the relevant existing laws

As a result, the population has grown rapidly. Life is tolerant of the left.

India will have a large population.

The population of China will remain stable.

[Mido D people are all Indians in the future]. I can't see that the whole human race is good at left/bad at left. Plumbers, electricians and cooks are not hereditary.

Departments can change careers, so they should not be included in evolution.

Reference: my own opinion

Welcome to criticize and correct me.

American Life Science Network: Which fossils support Darwin's theory of evolution, .myblog.yahoo/so what 2002002/article? Mid= 16 Please help with the online opinion survey and questionnaire survey: Do you accept evolution as a proven scientific theory? esurveyspro/App/Polls/direct pollx？ Id=3605 Questionnaire: Investigation on the knowledge of evolution: esurveyspro/Surveyx? id = c 40 BBC 4 1-d4f 2-48ec-b8d 2-32e 7d 183 e 406

According to Darwin's theory of evolution, fertility is based on natural selection, survival of the fittest and the law of the jungle. You may disagree with this view, but it is a powerful message of evolution. Strong species can get food and companions, while weak species will become food for others, or it is difficult to compete with natural environment and diseases, leading to elimination. Strong people can pass on excellent genes to the next generation, which refers to fertility. As for what you said, "It's like China, Hongkong or Singapore.

Many people are unmarried or have no children.

Will there be adverse effects? ",is a problem that can be discussed. 2009-06-1919: 49:13 Supplement: Because the strong will pass on excellent genes to the next generation and continue the species, in human society, the strong are people with money, social status and general higher education, and will choose to be single and not have children. Isn't that against evolution? For example, a large number of mainlanders who come to Hong Kong on Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (not derogatory), the fertility rate in backward countries in Africa is high, compared with that in advanced countries in Europe, and even the domestic population is declining. The phenomenon of expelling good money with individual capital and bad money seems to be progressive. 2009-06-20 15:09:30 supplement: the fittest is strong.

You have a problem with the law! ! ! ! Any animal can be used as an example.

Humans alone cannot be used as examples! ! ! Because in a way,

Humans will not be classified as nature.

Reference: self

Darwin's theory of evolution (called evolution) is inappropriate.

It doesn't matter whether it evolves or not.

Can also be downgraded! Do you consider yourself "excellent"

If you don't breed the next generation,

Humans who can still live on the earth in the future

It's definitely none of your business! (except playing DNA replication). in other words

In the process of natural selection,

You will betray yourself! 2009-06-1912: 22: 00 Supplement: Hello Wong 2254 (fifth grade) When discussing scientific topics,

Please put away all religious beliefs! Otherwise, we will never know that "the earth is oval"

I don't know what "H 1N 1" is! Getting married and having children is a personal problem.

You have the right to make your own decisions. 2009-06-1912: 22: 39 Supplement: Landlord, it's interesting for you to ask this question.

The problem involving "eugenics" generally holds that "the best of species can breed the next generation, and others will be eliminated." In fact, the so-called "excellent approval" is difficult to define.

It depends on the environment and opportunities. Take the immigration tide before the reunification as an example.

How many "intellectuals" can take root? There are countless backflow! oppositely

Those plumbers

electrician

Chef can successfully immigrate. This shows a truth: nothing is absolute. 2009-06-1912: 22: 53 Supplement: Don't care too much about marriage and childbirth! Let it be! but

From a biological point of view,

Giving birth to the next generation is good for mankind.

Can make "genes" diversified.

Enhance adaptability. 2009-06-20 12:55:37 supplement: it is difficult to define who is excellent by economic level. Take China as an example.

before long

Guangxi is an ancient civilization.

There are four great inventions.

Hantang

The yuan dynasty went directly to Europe ... these are all glorious pages; But there are also lonely times: in the Qing Dynasty, it was almost carved up by the great powers.

Sick man of Asia

The Japanese invaded China ... If we say "bad money drives out good money" when we are lonely.

It's not fair. Look at China today.

Be strong again

Has become the largest holder of us treasury bonds! The theory of evolution is applied to human beings.

Single biological factor

Not enough to explain. and

If we are from developed countries,

Go to backward countries in Africa.

Our adaptability may not be stronger than theirs! 2009-06-20 12:59:08 Supplement: Please go ahead.

Is the Chinese nation "strong" or "weak"? 2009-06-2018: 51:40 Supplement: Determine the "fittest" at that moment? 10 years ago/now/10 years later? Who will decide? You/me/God ...? Who would know? 2009-06-20 18:53:38 Supplement: Sorry! Who will decide? You/me/him ...? (Not to mention religion) 2009-06-2100: 40:17 Supplement: The way other animals adapt to the environment depends on a single creature.

For example, polar bears have thick fat protection under their skin.

But Eskimos don't live on thick fat under the skin. The way humans adapt to the environment depends on culture, social system, science and so on.

These are the fruits accumulated by predecessors.

Most of them have been with us since we were born

And new inventions.

Improve our lives. Supplement: Anthropologists and sociologists assume that human beings have natural social demanders, while human social demanders believe that. The social behavior of molecular human beings has non-geic reasons and motivations (that is, it is learned through social communication in a social environment) 2009-06-2102: 44:14 Supplement: It means that all people are plastic.