Why are the Japanese so rich and in debt?

Are you kidding?

Neon people eat well, live well, use luxury goods (Neon brand clothing and luxury goods are comparable to those in the EU), and half of Neon people use IPHONEs (and the sales of IPHONE XR, IPHONE XS and IPHONE X are very high. Neon NTT, au and Softbank mainly sell IPHONE), use MACBOOK and notebooks such as vaio and Panasonic

As long as it involves IP (intellectual property rights), people in Neon have to pay for reading a comic book online

Neon Film and Television basically has no advertisements. Even if there are, there are very dazzling advertisements related to TV roles at the end of the film (sponsors will be introduced in the middle of the TV series, but it will not affect the audience's watching)

Neon tourism, various festivals, various special consumption (such as Akihabara, Pachinko, etc.), special businesses run by the underworld (the service content of neon people is different from that of foreigners, and there are more restrictions on foreign services), hot springs, hand-run, etc.

It is said that neon people love to save money, and neon people do it.

do neon people have high debts? I heard for the first time that this is just as absurd as Sun Zhengyi's debt of $1 billion and Sony's bankruptcy.

The problem of Neon is not that the people are poor, but that the rich people evade taxes.

Not to mention illegal tax avoidance, Neon people try their best to transfer money to property heirs in other ways to avoid inheritance tax. Of course, they still have to pay high taxes in the end. But it's much stronger than inheritance tax

And the biggest problem of Neon tax evasion is the evasion of overseas rich people, and this money is really huge wealth (Neon has been cracking down on overseas tax evasion since 218)

You should know that Neon is a typical foreign investment country, and its overseas net assets are twice the domestic GDP (don't confuse GNP with overseas assets, which are completely different concepts), especially overseas investment in 218. Extremely crazy

The national debt of Neon is as high as 238%. To be honest, this algorithm is shameless. It is derived from the total debt /GDP of Neon, and this thing occasionally thinks of five items: domestic debt, GDP, external debt, overseas net assets and creditor's rights. As for the others, it is beyond my understanding, and there is a word called "external net assets" (overseas net assets-external liabilities), which is related to China.

But when it comes to investment, neon really can't. Wall Street's investment is the best in the world. It's no exaggeration to say that Wall Street can control the world. Look at how many companies around the world are behind Wall Street.

unlike China's crazy investment in railways and infrastructure, the United States and Japan mainly invest directly in enterprises (the investment in the United States and Japan is mainly a commercial act, with the purpose of obtaining benefits, At present, the more famous ones are Buffett, Soros, Jeffrey Gundlach, Masayoshi Son, Carl Celian Icahn, Howard Marks, David Tepper, Paul Singer and other investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

Nearly half of the national debt of Neon is in the hands of Neon citizens, and its external liabilities are only about half, while its overseas assets far exceed its external liabilities. In addition, Neon is the largest creditor country in the world. Therefore, the external liabilities of Neon are simply "pediatrics", so there is no need to worry about it ... As for whether the main government of Neon has the ability to pay the liabilities, it is not clear ... Neon also has a problem, that is, the central bank has become a major shareholder of many Neon listed companies after eight years of market entry. I don't know whether this is right or wrong, but it is obvious that the shareholders are central bank enterprises and will pay dividends to the central bank, and the shareholders are foreign-funded enterprises, and it is nothing new for the governments of various countries to invest. Even France and China are controlled by a typical husband. In contrast, it seems that criticizing the Neon Central Bank is untenable, but the United States and Britain are more inclined to let the husband let the enterprise grow independently, but South Korea and China are typical husbands' intervention and support ..............................................................................................................

far from the "debt crisis" that many friends have been worried about for years, neon government bonds are very popular in the world. Not long ago, the yield of neon government bonds was zero. How much did you speculate on the price of neon government bonds? It's really no money to earn, but someone still grabs it. What's the reason? Just to "hedge" ... If there is a "debt crisis" in neon itself, who else will buy neon government bonds to "hedge"

Many people don't feel the existence of the European Union, Britain, Canada, Australia and the Nordic countries, but others are rich. For Australians, spending in Japan is surprisingly high, which is really rich. Australia has a small population (24.86 million). Many people feel that South Korea's economy is super-strong, but Koreans are more embarrassed when they go abroad, and they can't wait for a dollar to be divided into ten parts to spend ... Some people say that Korean artists are poor, wrong, and Korean nationals are really poor (South Korea is not poor, but the correlation between the rich and the poor is too wide (the income difference between Korean artists is about 324 times)), and the income of neon artists is very low, but never poor (basically the income correlation is not big, Generally, the highest salary is 5 million yen (3, RMB, the highest salary of Ryoko Yonekura, Kimura Takuya and others) ... Neon is an interesting country, its poor people are not poor, its rich people are not rich, and its unemployment rate is surprisingly low (Neon is not short of jobs, but it lacks labor, too many jobs, too many shops and too few heirs). In 218, its Gini coefficient ranked 11th in the world (Northern Europe). A passport is the best in the world, and the environment is also good.

A picture of celebrity's pay is given casually for reference only. Please don't call it true because there is too little information. In fact, neon information is basically open.

Neon people undoubtedly belong to the category that the whole country is rich. When calculating the national average income and expenditure, please list the Gini coefficient together. The average money given by the rich to the poor will actually change nothing (the poor are still poor) The rich won't help the poor with a good average income to pay off their debts) ... Neon's per capita income is 18th, but considering the Gini coefficient and domestic prices (no comparison, no harm), this statement is too correct. No wonder people who travel to Japan are crazy about buying, and the prices are too conscience (prices have remained unchanged for more than 2 years). In fact, the actual income of Neon's poor is much higher than the ranking (as for the rich, do they need to worry about their wealth? What worries the rich is tax evasion.

Some friends associate everything with GDP and GNP, but they just don't know that GDP, GNP and GNI are similar concepts. What makes me feel speechless most these years is "GNP and overseas assets"? I don't understand why so many people have mixed GNP with overseas assets for so many years. What is GNP? GNP=GDP+ net factor income from abroad (this figure can be positive or negative) ... But what is the relationship between overseas assets and GDP? Can overseas assets be negative? Who has heard of any country whose overseas assets are negative? Who has heard that GDP is negative? Then the question is, what does "net factor income from abroad" represent? If you don't understand, just look at GDP directly. Anyway, the data of GNP, GNI and GDP are similar, and sometimes the data are exactly the same ... Now many people equate per capita GDP with no per capita income. Isn't this talking nonsense? GDP (Gross Domestic Product): refers to the sum of all final products and services produced by all resident units of a country (or region) in a certain period of time. Does the value generated by GDP all belong to a country's citizens? Or was it taken away by foreign businessmen? By the same token, isn't the value generated by domestic businessmen's overseas investment the income of their own nationals?

Foreign investment is too bad. First, the domestic GDP will decrease, then the domestic unemployment rate will increase, and then the import and export volume will decrease, because these are recorded in the host country ... but what if foreign investment earns income? For example, Masayoshi Son invested 25 million yuan in Alibaba and became Alibaba. After more than ten years, he sold some of his shares and got a profit of 1 billion US dollars (he is still the major shareholder of Alibaba and enjoys the most dividends every year). Then, isn't Masayoshi Son's money from his investment in Alibaba? (I don't want to care whether it belongs to Son or Softbank. Son personally owns 6% of Alibaba (Jack Ma holds 7%, 8.9% at the peak) and 21% of Softbank). If the income from foreign investment doesn't belong to him in the end, I don't think anyone in the world will "invest abroad".

As for some friends, Neon people were born with 7.5 million yen (. Where did this newly born neon man come from? Can it be said that "the existence of neon man is itself a' debt'"? What does Neon Masao's debt have to do with Neon citizens? Neon Masao's debt is naturally paid back by Masao, and Neon Masao has huge net creditor's rights (external assets far exceed external liabilities)

If we look at the per capita GDP alone, the United States is indeed strong, but if we contact the net debt rights, then the United States may be poor, but if we consider that "more than 4% of the global profits are created by the United States", then the United States should be extremely rich, so whether the United States is poor or rich, to be honest, I don't even understand. Because I don't know how many things need to be considered to see the truth of a country's economy clearly. A country's economy can definitely be seen by comparing GDP. The value of many things is far above GDP. For example, neon is only a government debt that is 2.38 times of GDP. At the end of 217, the government debt in the United States was 35.5 trillion US dollars (GDP was only 19.39 trillion US dollars)

The more you know about the stock market, The more you find that you didn't study economics at the beginning, it's a big mistake, because you are too ignorant and don't know anything, but you should pay attention when you look at the data. If you check the annual salary, you can just ignore the "per capita GDP ranking". There are many "pits" in domestic news, and don't convert neon data into dollars and compare them, because "the exchange rate changes every day.