How to prove the source of funds?

Immigration authorities in the United States and Canada require applicants to prove the source of funds, one of which is to ensure that the applicant's funds have not been "laundered" by investment immigrants.

Since September 1 1, the U.S. government has revised the immigration regulations many times to prevent terrorists from using illegal channels to support terrorist attacks in the United States, which shows how much the United States attaches importance to the source of funds for investment immigration applicants.

According to the latest regulations, the US Immigration Bureau not only requires applicants to provide absolutely reliable documents to prove that their sources of funds are legal, but also needs to further prove that their "first bucket of gold" is legally obtained.

If you ask me, what is the best way to do it? In my opinion, the most ideal way is to provide long-term and continuous proof of income, such as proof that the applicant has a legitimate job or business for many years of tax declaration, or earn investment funds for immigrants from the United States and Canada through long-term investment. If the applicant obtains investment funds by selling a large amount of real estate or other liquid assets, the immigration authorities in the United States and Canada are likely to require the applicant to further prove when and how he obtained the source of funds for the assets he sold.

In other words, if the applicant obtains the capital to invest in the United States and Canada by borrowing money, the Immigration Bureau will certainly investigate and analyze the whole borrowing process and background of the applicant more carefully. I want to point out that the United States, in particular, will basically not approve the mortgage of assets in the United States to obtain funds for investment in the United States.

I can tell you that the immigration authorities in the United States and Canada will not rely on a single channel to confirm whether the applicant's source of funds is legal. Therefore, in order to improve the credibility, it is best to hire a senior accountant or lawyer to sort out and review the relevant documents before submitting them.

Undeniably, the United States, Canada and other western developed countries, despite the economic downturn in recent years, still attract a large number of nationals from developing countries headed by China (perhaps because of the economic downturn, the threshold for individual investment immigration projects has been lowered), hoping to immigrate to the local area. In addition to advanced, their charm is of course freedom.

Take us for example. In addition to Hong Kong's investment immigrants, the most frequently consulted are immigration projects in developed countries such as the United States and Canada. However, before considering American and Canadian investment immigrants, we must first think clearly whether we can prove that the source of funds is completely legal. Otherwise, we should stop thinking about these two countries.