Europeans are lazy and have no industry. How can they have such good benefits?

As an employee, who gets up the earliest compared with your boss? Whose income is higher? Who has more free time? Besides, is high welfare really that beautiful?

After thousands of years of ideological education, we always have an excessive fascination with the unified country. Of course, safeguarding the peaceful reunification of the motherland is the basic responsibility of every citizen, but in many ways, it will lead us into some misunderstandings. As we all know, there are many small countries in Europe, which constitute the loose body of the European Union. In addition, most European countries are small governments, and people's rights are often great.

Gao Fuli, where are you from?

Most European countries are small, but in terms of per capita income, infrastructure construction and other aspects of people's livelihood, Europe is not only ahead of China in many aspects, but even the world hegemon, the United States, may not be able to compare.

European countries have also experienced industrial upgrading, and high-end manufacturing with high added value can continue at home, while more labor-intensive and high-pollution and high-energy-consuming industries have already been transferred to developing countries, but the benefits are still in their own hands.

Paris is a world-famous fashion capital; Swiss watch manufacturing is world-famous; Nokia is Finnish; Norway has oil and fisheries, and it is extremely rich just to sell salmon; London in Britain is still one of the international financial centers; Rome, an ancient city, has explored its humanistic and historical advantages and turned itself into a tourist attraction.

If the country wants to develop and the economy wants to become stronger, it is necessary to develop an export-oriented economy. It's better to be both ends. Don't pay any of your own resources, but pay all your vanity, brand, creativity, management, patents, culture and so on. And then earn foreign exchange, purely from the outside. As long as their products sell well all over the world, their culture is sought after by the whole world, their technology can be patented, and people all over the world can support such a small group of citizens.

No country can become rich without obtaining it from outside. Relying solely on internal circulation is a peasant-style lifestyle, which is bound to be poor and bitter.

China, Japan and South Korea are the hardest-working countries in the world. East Asian countries are the fastest-growing countries in the world in recent decades, because they keep working, mainly for export, selling all kinds of cheap goods all over the world, making small profits but quick turnover and occupying the market.

China's economy has been changing, from shanzhai, plagiarism and made in China, which were criticized in the past, to the leap-forward development of emerging technology companies such as China Internet, which infiltrated scientific and technological achievements into Silicon Valley.

Dutch welfare is the most domineering.

The welfare in the Netherlands is the highest among European countries. Dutch people only need to work four days a week on average, and the average working time in a year is only 1300 hours, which means only 3.6 hours a day. Why are Dutch workers so "blessed"?

Dutch industry relies on machinery and has a high degree of automation, which is similar in other parts of Europe. Basically, when the machine can do it, it won't use manpower. The Netherlands exports the most flowers, and planting flowers in the Netherlands is also a mechanized operation. One person can manage a large flower field by controlling machinery.

Logistics is also automated, so the Netherlands can export170,000 flowers to the world every day, which makes Dutch workers have considerable income.

Many European leaders are more or less like Bai Lianhua, probably influenced by World War II. Germany and France are willing to accept many refugees. A while ago, our country was in an uproar, which led to large-scale demonstrations by domestic people. It really doesn't make sense for the government to raise a group of restless foreigners with money and finally have to pay for it by its own people.

Some European countries, such as the Netherlands, are very strict in immigration management. It can be said that there are almost no "immigrant countries" in the traditional sense in Europe. I didn't get a local work permit, so I was not allowed to work, so no one grabbed the job, and the work efficiency was extremely high and the degree of mechanization was high.

To put it simply, Europe has a highly developed productive force and few people, and it only needs to work four days a week easily to create great value.

The opposite of Europe is developing countries, such as India now.

India's recognized low wages, there is no minimum wage, and because there are many people, human resources are cheap. Rich people would rather have their clothes washed by hand than buy a washing machine. So all the laundry factories in India are basically hand-washed, because hand-washing is cheaper than your own household washing machine, and electric washing is more expensive than hand-washing.

In this way, the income of laundry workers is very low, and even if they work seven days a week, they can only struggle to survive on the food and clothing line.

High welfare, is it really that beautiful?

The source of funds for high welfare is often high taxes or high debts, which is not conducive to the sustainable development of economy and society.

Sweden's high welfare depends on high taxes and high fiscal deficit; Greece's high welfare is supported by high debt. Using high taxes to support high welfare will inevitably reduce the development funds of enterprises and restrict the development of enterprises, which is tantamount to killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

The utilization rate of social security resources under high welfare is not high, such as the waste of medical resources such as drugs in public medical care; Some people could have been employed instead of actively employed, enjoying the leisure brought by social security and unemployment insurance excessively and choosing to retire early.

Once these phenomena are widespread, social resources are seriously wasted, and the national spirit is no longer active, it will affect economic development.

Democracy has plunged European countries into the quagmire of "high welfare". When we talk about Greece, this problem is obvious.

Greece's high welfare bankruptcy is basically the following process:

Insufficient financial resources, unable to make ends meet; No money for high welfare; The government wants to reduce welfare; If the voters don't agree, I will vote for you to step down if you want to improve your welfare; In this way, in order not to step down, the government can only continue to provide high welfare; Without money to engage in high welfare, the government can only borrow money; Borrowed money can only be used for welfare, not for industrial development; After a long time, the government directly under it went bankrupt.

To put it bluntly, any president who dares to move high welfare will be voted out by a democratic national system. This fast knot has stuck almost all European countries trying to cut welfare.

Since the industrial revolution, European countries have gained huge national dividends in different ways by taking the lead in science and technology.

After that, the Democratic voters continuously obtained various huge and high benefits by voting, and at the same time continuously reduced their working hours. In this case, no matter how big the Jinshan is, it will be eaten.

European countries that maintain high welfare will inevitably undergo great changes in the future, because this high welfare democracy has endangered the operation of the state machine.

Europeans who are used to democracy, holidays and beaches, is it possible for you to make them work hard again with low welfare?

When you have money, democracy can be happy, and you can be happy with me.

So, when there is no money?

Welcome attention: Baijiahao: She said wealth.