Debate contest on zoo animals

The shortcomings are mainly human interference factors. Arguments that can be developed:

The survival of free animals has lost its freedom because of human selfishness. No one wants to be watched in a cage, even if he is an animal.

Killing spirituality Every living thing has its own way of life. It is against nature for human beings to turn it into a "pet" by raising it.

"Wrong Feelings" People sometimes make a lot of human actions when they visit the zoo. I don't know if animals will be hurt because I can't communicate. This is as barbaric as human colonialists.

The main argument is the disadvantages of human intervention.

If you want to win, you must have maximum sympathy for the status quo of zoo animals. When the audience's sympathy is aroused, you win. Never blame humans. As a person, you don't want others to blame you. So complaining on the side is the weapon to win.

Manual only.