Does the reconstruction of the village in weiyang district, Xi City include the village in the university park?

I am from Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, and implemented the "Village in the City" plan, but now it does not include Hubei Zhuang, Caodianzi and Dujiabao next to Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, so their development still does not meet the requirements.

Look at the following regulations about villages in cities, which are developing very well now. Although it is not planned by the government, it is just like renting a house and opening a shop in a village in the city. People in this place should be rich now and will be richer in the future.

The first type, located in the urban built-up area, has no farmers' hukou and farmland for a long time, and has been changed to street offices and neighborhood committees for urban management for a long time, canceling the township administrative system and having no farmers' collective property and homestead property rights. In fact, this kind of area is equivalent to the reconstruction area of dangerous old houses in the city, and it is applicable to the management measures of urban housing, land and residents' demolition. Relevant policies can be adopted to transform dilapidated houses into pieces. However, migrant workers should be properly resettled, and they cannot be expelled free of charge. Because these areas are populated by migrants, and a few low-income people can live in them, and these low-income migrant workers have made great contributions to Beijing's economic development, they cannot be discriminated against and excluded. The process of urbanization means that a large number of farmers can survive for generations by entering the city, become urban residents completely and enjoy the modern life of the city. But the premise is that farmers can find work and life in cities and have a living foundation. Mr. Guanzhong Wen, an American scholar in China, once wrote an article entitled "Inevitability of Urbanization" and "Slums", pointing out that it is precisely because of the existence of slums that cities are particularly dynamic. The existence of slums makes the cost of urban expansion particularly low and inclusive. The rent in slums is low, and the neighbors who are also degraded in the world are more sympathetic and caring for newcomers, making it easier for new immigrants to find a place to live. Most of the new immigrants living in slums took one or two generations to integrate into the mainstream society. This happened not only in new york and Chicago in the United States, but also in Hongkong, Peking and Shanghai in China. Zhejiang village in Beijing was a mess in those days. After more than ten years of capital accumulation and transformation, it has now become a vibrant shopping center group. Mayors in the United States are very smart and know that the development of cities cannot be separated from the continuous influx of new immigrants, so they not only allow slums to exist, but also compete for population within themselves. Mayors in China regard slums as scars of the city, which will affect their image and achievements, and do everything possible to drive them away and forcibly demolish them. Slums are indeed unsightly and the public security is poor, but poverty is not the fault of farmers themselves. It is the fault of government officials not to let them get rich and live in tall buildings. If we really want to speed up urbanization, we should face up to the existence of slums and even allow them to expand for a period of time, so as to greatly reduce the cost of urbanization, thus greatly speeding up the urbanization process in China and enabling China to benefit from the cumulative effect of urbanization to the maximum extent. Therefore, in the process of transforming the "village in the city", it is an important issue to properly resettle the migrant population so that they can continue to live in low-rent housing.

The second type: there is no cultivated land in the village. The land except the homestead in the original natural village has been requisitioned and turned into urban construction land, and there is no collective property of farmers in the village. Although some villages have changed rural village committees into urban neighborhood committees and farmers have become urban population, farmers' homesteads have not been expropriated as state-owned, and the property rights of homesteads and houses are still farmers' property rights. These farmers' homesteads and houses should still be fully compensated according to the expropriation of farmers' land. Housing demolition can be combined with the urban private house demolition policy to distinguish different situations, formulate relevant compensation policies, and properly resettle farmers. Especially for those who are unemployed and have no source of income, a corresponding social security system should be established.

The third type: the existing land property rights of "villages in cities" are still owned by rural collectives, and villagers mainly receive non-agricultural income. All or most of the land has been expropriated by the state. Although all the farmers in the village have turned into urban hukou, the farmers' homestead has not been requisitioned as state-owned and the nature of the land has not changed. This part of the "village" is still a "village system" and village governance is implemented. There are even many farmers' collective property and village-run enterprise economic entities. Good location conditions and low construction costs make the housing rental rate of "village in city" quite high. Housing rental, together with the dividend income in the village, can make the villagers live a fairly rich material life. The average living standard of some villagers has even far exceeded that of urban residents. Many farmers have their own enterprises, mainly engaged in some primary catering, entertainment, transportation, construction, agricultural and sideline products and vegetable retail industries, or renting houses as their main occupation. These areas are the most difficult to transform. Market economy makes it impossible for the government to solve the employment problem of farmers as in the past, and it is also difficult to satisfy farmers with monetary resettlement. Therefore, it is not appropriate for these places to forcibly requisition village land as urban state-owned land. The property of farmers' original collective enterprises can still be owned by farmers and can be reorganized into collective-owned trading companies. The population is digested locally, and employment is solved locally. The nature of land property rights remains unchanged, and it is still owned by the collective. For the land that needs to be occupied, it can also be used as a land share or lease to obtain income every year to ensure the livelihood of the land-expropriated residents.

Fourth, there is still a part of cultivated land, which was established by township governments and village committees. There are still many people who are registered as farmers. Villages where agriculture, animal husbandry and farming still account for a certain proportion. When such areas are transformed, farmers will be converted into urban hukou, township governments will be reorganized into street offices, and village committees will be reorganized into neighborhood committees, but land property rights and economic organization forms can remain unchanged. The property and land collectively owned by the original village can be reorganized into a joint-stock company of agriculture, industry and commerce, and the employment of personnel will be solved on the spot by the joint-stock company of agriculture, industry and commerce and become employees of the company. We can develop modern agriculture and aquaculture by developing urban agriculture. Such as: factory soilless cultivation of high-grade vegetables and flowers; Sightseeing agriculture; Planting orchards and herbs; Carry out the breeding of rare animals such as ostriches, peacocks, golden roosters and elk; Develop agricultural, industrial and commercial industries that do not affect the urban landscape and environment, such as deep processing of agricultural products, so that farmers can use the original land resources and integrate their familiar labor skills into urban life. Using urban agriculture to transform "villages in cities" has the lowest cost and the best effect.

The 23 1 "village in the city" to be rebuilt this time is mainly the first and second categories, and will turn to the third and fourth categories in the future. It is necessary to make full preparations, adopt different transformation methods for different "villages in the city", adapt to local conditions, "one village and one case", and transform each "village in the city" according to different conditions. It not only changed the appearance of the city, but also benefited local residents and was properly resettled.

However, no matter what kind of transformation, the transformation of "village in city" must be organized and planned by the government. The government is responsible for land requisition, demolition and municipal supporting projects in the first-class land development. Apart from the land originally granted to developers, it basically tries not to take the form of commercial development to avoid many sequelae and problems. To mobilize the enthusiasm of local residents, efforts should be made to plan and design by the government, complete municipal pipeline roads, give appropriate subsidies, and organize residents to build their own houses by housing cooperatives. The property rights of completed houses belong to the residents themselves, and the remaining houses can be rented for sale, thus reducing contradictions and difficulties in transformation. In a word, the transformation of "village in city" is a good thing, but also difficult. We need to brainstorm, brainstorm, mobilize the enthusiasm of all parties, and properly resolve the conflicts of interests of all parties in order to do this good thing well.