On which platform does Dr. Liu see the world?

Rules don't work, Fiona Fang. People from the media should also be objective and cautious. Objectively speaking, many American works read by Dr. Liu are true. Of course, there must be a lot of false news. For self-media creators, it may be a sign that Dr. Liu was banned.

Text/in the storm

Inadvertently, some people from the media said that Dr. Liu was very empty when he saw that the United States suddenly broke. Moreover, some netizens left a message: Dr. Liu looked at the United States, and the report information was true. It was the first time to report it. He is an impartial blogger.

Don't comment on their views. What I want to emphasize is: Why don't many netizens know that Dr. Liu regards the United States as an individual from the media and still thinks that the current situation of his account and "sudden disconnection" are cyber violence and disappointment, which is worth pondering.

draw

First of all, Dr. Liu focuses on the current situation in the United States

First of all, it should be emphasized that Dr. Liu's views on the United States are not simple.

Probably checked. The current basic situation of his account can be summarized as: (1) a broken state; A melon, a sound, a degree and a blog all indicate that there is no such person!

In other words, Dr. Liu's view of America is self-defeating. It is suspected that the account is cancelled on multiple platforms.

(1) Dr. Liu's views on the situation in the United States in a certain tone

draw

It is worth mentioning that the United States that Dr. Liu saw was not the name on a sound platform, but the United States that Dr. Liu talked about. But the latest inspection shows that the United States mentioned by Dr. Liu is suspected of selling numbers. In addition, the author also uses Dr. Liu to look at American search, and there is no such person.

(2) Dr. Liu saw the situation in the United States in a certain melon, a certain degree and a certain blog.

draw

It can be seen that Dr. Liu did not find this person on a melon platform and was suspected of cancellation. As for a certain blog and a certain degree, there may be no relevant account.

Second, about Dr. Liu's views or comments on the United States.

At a glance on the major platforms, netizens have great differences on Dr. Liu's view of the United States. There are those who support it and those who oppose it.

(1) Objection

As far as personal observation is concerned, most opponents think that his position is not objective. What's more, he quoted all western reports and was suspected to be first-hand news because it was too timely. Moreover, a micro-article has almost no news sources and relevant evidence. Some netizens described him as a war correspondent of Jane's China Network in Ukraine. At the same time, it reminds people of another popular science blogger, Big V Universe and Science.

Objectively speaking, compared with Dr. Liu's view of the United States, the universe and science are also very close to Ukraine in their positions, and they are also dozens of front-line news for war reporters every day. But the universe and science have long been banned by the whole network around March. The reason is actually an early sign. Dr. Cai Zi, who has settled in the United States, once summed up three points: private goods are too provocative, extorting a lot of comments, and playing dumb in front of big and big issues.

draw

(2) the views of supporters

draw

Some netizens who support Dr. Liu's visit to the United States believe that he has been subjected to cyber violence, while others are at a loss for his "broken watch". But the most influential statement may be this:

The significance of Dr. Liu's announcement. Recently, someone attacked Dr. Liu. In fact, the significance of Dr. Liu's announcement is to open another window for everyone. It is true that the news sources cited by Dr. Liu are Ukrainian and western media, and Dr. Liu also explained this in the video. Believe it or not, it's personal freedom. But Dr. Liu has at least given us another information channel, and we can make our own judgments by synthesizing various information.

To put it bluntly, Dr. Liu's news is at least 1000 times stronger than the news of the media that occupied Kiev for more than one hour and twenty minutes and the so-called "big fish theory".

Of course, for those who are willing to listen to false information and are unwilling to compare all kinds of information, consider it Dr. Liu's nonsense. You also have the right.

Personally, I won't comment on this yet. But personally, both supporters and opponents may not understand the real reason why Dr. Liu's account in the United States was banned or cancelled.

Third, Dr. Liu saw the real reason why the United States was suspected of canceling.

What does Dr. Liu think is the real reason for the suspected cancellation of the United States? I think the answer may be that there are different opinions. However, personally, things are not complicated. If netizens are also self-media creators, then it is easy to guess the real problem of Dr. Liu's view of America.

Dr. Liu believes that the United States "suddenly broke its watch" because it did not abide by the corresponding rules of the platform. To put it bluntly, he is an individual from the media and does not have the qualification to directly produce news. You can quote analysis, but you can't directly publish news that is difficult to distinguish between true and false as a professional media. In addition, no tangible evidence was provided. This not only does not meet the basic requirements and norms of media creators, but also adds a lot of unnecessary disputes to themselves.

draw

As the saying goes, there is no Fiona Fang without rules. People live in real life, and individuals should be objective from the media. Especially when it comes to current politics or the international field, we should be more cautious.

Objectively speaking, many American works read by Dr. Liu are true. Of course, many of them have been proved to be rumors. Especially considering that he didn't provide any sources and relevant evidence. Once the platform conducts self-examination, etc. It is found that many of his works are related to rumors, so it may not only be removed from the shelf, but it is suspected that he directly produces "fake news."

In short, Dr. Liu saw that the United States was suspected of being sold by multiple platforms, warning media people to be as objective as possible and abide by the corresponding rules of the platform. The analysis can be quoted, but the direct "production news" is of a bad nature. Once it is proved to be a rumor, its influence will be even greater. Some netizens may not understand this, but media creators should understand it. What's more, not long ago, Chengdu Rainforest was a warning.

Of course, Dr. Liu thinks that the tropical rain forest in the United States is still very different from the tropical rain forest in Chengdu. But it is enough to warn people from the media to abide by the rules and be as objective as possible.