Job Recruitment Website - Immigration policy - Hu Xijin's speech ended, the People's Education Society apologized, and the dispute over illustration ended. Why didn't Wu Yong show up?

Hu Xijin's speech ended, the People's Education Society apologized, and the dispute over illustration ended. Why didn't Wu Yong show up?

With the opening of Jinkou in Hu Xijin, the discussion space of illustrations in mathematics textbooks of People's Education Society has been pulled back from "enemy spy infiltration" to aesthetics and professional fields. After the final decision, the Ministry of Education instructed the People's Education Publishing House to correct it immediately, and the People's Education Society apologized, finally ending this long-standing hot discussion.

Hu's speech was final, and the People's Education Association apologized and admitted the mistake.

In the ardent expectation of a group of netizens, Khufu finally forgot to rest, voiced the controversy over the illustrations of "Primary Mathematics" by People's Education Publishing House, which continued to rush to the hot search, and gave the final conclusion. Illustration has obviously broken through the category of "style", and the moral and cultural correctness is totally unacceptable, but it should be limited to "telling the facts", and the situation is far from out of control to the extent that the backyard is copied. Don't make it look like ".

It can be said that, as an old saying goes, the Ministry of Education, the highest institution, first issued the "research decision". The first one is "instruct People's Education Publishing House to rectify immediately, reorganize professional forces to draw illustrations of teaching materials, and ensure the use of new teaching materials in the fall semester of 2022". The Ministry of Education will also organize an expert group to personally "strictly review and check".

Secondly, the Ministry of Education also took this opportunity to "immediately deploy a comprehensive investigation of textbooks for primary and secondary schools across the country" and focus on "content and illustrations" in the hardest hit areas. Once problems are found, they should be rectified immediately, "to ensure that textbooks adhere to the correct political direction and value orientation, carry forward the excellent Chinese culture, and conform to the aesthetic habits of the public."

In Khufu's view, the situation is far from "out of control to that extent"

Don't make it seem that our educational publishing position has really been lost and occupied by evil forces, and it needs a Jedi counterattack. This panic that our backyard has been "copied" is completely unnecessary.

Seeking truth from facts, these views of Lao Hu are consistent with those expounded in my previous article. Whether it's aesthetics or illustration itself, we can reward each other on merit, without worrying about "infiltration" outside the event.

As Khufu said, there are at least "no small loopholes" in the editorial comments of People's Education Society. Even the market-oriented publishing institutions are limited by the shortage of editors, and it is still very terrible if there is a situation of "rashly releasing the samples". I believe that "People's Education Society will definitely learn from this illustration dispute and carry out rectification". As for whether there are "interest transfer" and "poor management and control" that everyone guesses, such a conclusion cannot be confused, and everyone still needs to wait for the result of seeking truth from facts.

Why didn't Wu Yong show up?

People's Education Society's apology and rectification also indicate that this wave of rising public opinion crisis caused by illustrations in mathematics textbooks is coming to an end. After getting a satisfactory answer, the public's attention can also be shifted to other fields, giving the People's Education Society a relaxed public opinion environment to enhance its strength and extract high-quality teaching materials.

While Hu Xijin's inculcation has been recognized by the vast majority of netizens, we sincerely hope that Wu Yong's illustrations are still confined to two controversial fields: "aesthetics" and "commerce".

Of course, if unconfirmed rumors and "investigation" in Khufu's mouth are finally confirmed, we should also believe Khufu's precautionary judgment. The situation is far from being "copied" in the backyard, and there is no need to panic like "our educational publishing position is really lost" and "the Jedi need to fight back".