Tianjin is good. Qingdao is better.

To say who is better, the first thing is better than Qingdao. However, Qingdao has a history of 100 years, and now it has become the ninth largest city in China, with great development potential. Tianjin also saw the benefits of the coast. Now it is not Tianjin that can build a new port area and develop the coast. That's quite right. The future new port will definitely replace the old Tianjin, but it will not be as good as Qingdao's seaport. It should be said that Qingdao is at the same level. In another 20 years, Qingdao will soon surpass it. First of all, I want to say that my friend made a mistake, saying that Tianjin, an industrial base, is stronger than Qingdao, just like the GDP of China now. I don't care how strong your industry is, I care how much money you can earn a year. Even if you have 100 factories, there is one in another city. That city earns more money than you, so you are not as good as it, which is why old cities in the past came one after another. Wuhan is a good example. Although the industrial foundation is solid, Shanghai and Beijing are Wuhan, but they just can't make much money, and they are directly dropped out of 10 big cities by Suzhou, Qingdao and Shenzhen. Tianjin is a place with great development potential. On the one hand, the industrial base cannot be used to measure the development potential of a city.