The ultimate finale of mankind and the universe?

Let's start with the ultimate ending of the universe. Personally, I think it's like saying the end of a straight line. The universe has no end. My view of the universe is in New Interpretation of the Universe, you can have a look. We talk about the universe just as ants talk about the solar system and the Milky Way. In fact, for them, a few drops of rain changed their world, and their so-called universe also changed greatly with the arrival of a rain. What about the facts? The universe has no beginning and no end. We can only experience and foresee the process of a certain period of time, and a certain area is our own small area. The universe is constantly changing. According to my hypothesis, the universe and everything in it are in dynamic balance. As for the future development of the universe, I think it is composed of countless local destruction and regeneration. The black hole devours, to a certain extent, the energy explosion, the energy explosion caused by the encounter of positive and negative matter, and the collision of stars in a certain area occur all the time in every corner of the universe. Don't say no simply because we can't observe it. Sooner or later, the same thing will happen to our earth, or it will collide with other stars, or it will be destroyed, or it will split into several pieces when the dynamic balance around it (such as the energy consumption of the sun is almost the same) is broken; Either swallowed by other black holes; Or the most unfortunate encounter antimatter, return to the state of energy flow. This is the final outcome of our local area. This kind of thing happens all the time in the universe.

Besides, there is only one answer to the ultimate end of mankind: destruction. This is not pessimism, but seeking truth from facts. With the development of science and technology, it is not impossible for human beings to migrate to other planets. However, human beings can kill almost any species on the earth easily, but this power is nothing compared with the big energy explosion in the universe. Humans can't leave the solar system at present. Once the dynamic balance of the solar system is greatly changed by the influence of the surrounding environment, the changes in the earth's climate and environment caused by it alone are unbearable for human beings. After a catastrophe, the earth may be lucky enough to exist, but the existence of human beings has become history, and perhaps more advanced creatures will be produced in the future. They will study humans as humans study dinosaurs.

Attachment: a new interpretation of the universe

I want to add my own answer, but there are only two sentences left in the end. Please answer it again.

I study chemistry, and my rich imagination helps me solve one problem after another. I have had my own assumptions about the world view for a long time. First of all, let's look at the so-called conservation of mass in chemical reactions, the simplest exothermic combustion reaction, and the total mass before and after the reaction is equal, which is the conservation of mass. But everyone knows MC2, the conversion formula of mass and energy. Is the released heat energy heat energy? Can it be converted into quality? Although it is very small!

Anyway, regarding the origin of the universe, I think the beginning of the universe is composed of energy flows with different densities. The so-called HarmonyOS system and chaotic state can be imagined by clouds. They surge at high speed and collide with each other, thus producing a large number of vortex particles with higher energy density, big or small, positive or negative, which is the most basic composition of the macro world. These particles absorb energy from one end of the vortex and release energy from the other end, forming a dynamic balance. Between these particles, the energy density becomes thinner (note that it is not gone). The absorption capacity is quite different, the small ones are absorbed by the big ones, and the absorption capacity is equivalent, and the regular larger particles are formed by mutual attraction at one end. Because of the attraction between them, smaller particles move around it in a circle. Small particles are absorbed by large energy vortices, forming miniature black hole models, or swallowing other small particles to continue to grow, or being swallowed by other larger black holes. When particles with the same rotation direction form black holes and larger particles, two particles with different rotation directions meet, that is, they melt each other and return to the state of energy flow, which may be the so-called positive and negative matter.

It is also said here that there is no absolute vacuum. If the above hypothesis holds, the universe is full of energy, but the density is different. Energy and macroscopic matter are actually the same, that is, they are both energy.

Then talk about the speed of light and time and space. It can be seen from the above assumptions that light is also an energy flow with relatively high density or small original particles, and its speed should be less than or equal to the speed of energy flow, in other words, energy can have a faster speed. But this does not mean that people can reach the future! For a popular example, a group of people live in a village. None of them have been to the mountains in the west. One day, everyone set out for there at the same time. Your car will get there first and then come back. Can you say that you have reached the future? ! It has changed there. Maybe some people say that consciousness can reach the future (although I don't quite believe it). Don't forget my premise that matter is energy! Consciousness is also an energy flow and a part of your body.

Besides, going back to the past is even more impossible. Their premise should be ftl. Absolute time in the universe is the same! No matter what units are used, the universe in the next moment is definitely not the previous universe, and you are not the original you. Nothing in the past will ever happen again. Don't think this is a philosophical problem, this is real science. The universe is the unity of matter and energy, including people, in a dynamic balance that changes all the time.

If this hypothesis holds, many definitions and so on need to be redefined now! Such as conservation of mass.

For example, vacuum, we can say that vacuum is unreal! In addition to the energy flow, there are smaller particles in the vacuum.

But I have no theoretical basis, but this hypothesis can explain many phenomena. For example, the problem of gravity, which should be the essence of gravity, and the problem of black holes. According to the current theory, atoms are composed of neutrons, protons and electrons. My hypothesis can be interpreted as that neutrons and protons are larger regular particles composed of smaller particles according to the pattern of vortex gravity, while electrons are basically the most primitive particles, and small particles move around them in circles under the action of gravity, forming a relatively stable dynamic balance.

I hope to have more imaginative friends.