How to survive better in private enterprises

Many professional managers fail in private enterprises because of power-they must "this matter belongs to me." Several of my professional managers will complain: in the contract we signed, I have the power of affairs and finance, and my approval authority is 6.5438+million yuan. As a result, I didn't even have 6.5438+million yuan. I said you know too little about private enterprises. This is a private enterprise in China, and it will sign100000 with you, but it still has the final approval right. Don't play word games with him. Private enterprises in China have no word games. The first thing you have to do is to reassure him that I'm not here to fight for power with you. I don't want power. ?

In fact, they don't understand that this is the unspoken rule of China enterprises: the chairman is the CEO. Although he gave you the title of CEO, he is still the most important in the company. This is centralized and imperial management, a bit like the traditional politics in China. One person has the final say, and the power is extremely concentrated, while others have almost no power. You should look down on power and even give it up. On the other hand, foreign companies are scattered. Foreign companies are power-centered, and the most important thing is power. Moreover, small employees in foreign companies have power, and a small immigration officer in the United States has more power than anyone else.

The first is the motivation mentioned just now.

The second is communication. I think communication is the most suitable relationship between professional managers and bosses. Chen Tianqiao and I haven't blushed once in four years. I will communicate with him when I meet a situation, and he will communicate with me. Communication has become a tacit understanding between us. What are the benefits of tacit understanding? What are the benefits of communication? If you succeed, you are both heroes. If you fail, no one will blame anyone. Because many decisions are not clear in the end whether it is Chen Tianqiao's decision or Tang Jun's decision. I call it "sandwich biscuit decision". A biscuit contains Tang Jun's ingredients and Chen Tianqiao's ingredients, and everyone is involved. ?

If it's my decision and I succeed in the end, people will say that this person is great. But don't forget, success is not important, avoiding failure is the most important thing. The easiest way to avoid failure is to make all your decisions cross. ?

This is also the difference between private enterprises and foreign enterprises. The most important thing for foreign companies is whether this is your decision. Because foreign companies have leaders, I decided that I can still improve if I do well, but private enterprises have no room for improvement, which will come to an end. Tang Jun has come to an end, there is no need to show off in front of Chen Tianqiao. Your greatest ability is not to make mistakes, but you can't do nothing, and you can't let people say how you spent so much money to find such a person. Very subtle. It is survival wisdom. ?

The third key word is benefit. Why do many professional managers finally choose to start their own businesses? Because he saw the uneven distribution of benefits. He thinks entrepreneurs earn so much money, and he thinks entrepreneurs have little ability. If you have such a market, I will dig some people in the company, share a piece of it and start a business. ?

So shares and options are still very important, which can make professional managers feel at ease in the enterprise. So how do professional managers fight for their own interests? I don't think two kinds of people should compete with others for benefits and value returns. ?

The first kind of people are those who have just entered the enterprise. Never say whether you can give me more salary in the first five years. The most important thing is what you can learn from the enterprise and whether it is conducive to development. Besides, people at the top of the pyramid should never play that game with your boss. It's not necessary. It all depends on him. You kick this ball to him and let him decide. It's actually harder for him. You brought it up, but he will think you are such a person. In fact, he already has a steelyard in his heart.

It's hard to be second in command.

The first is mentality. This is inevitable for all professional managers-I've always been the boss and suddenly I'm the second child. I am also a great person. When I was at Microsoft, I was in charge of everything. When I was older, I had to make such a psychological adjustment for my second child. ?

The second is skill. To put it bluntly, there are also some hidden rules. You must find such hidden rules. For example, when I went to Shanda, someone told me that Shanda needs talents most now, and Microsoft is the place with the most talents. You should dig four or five. I know he means well, but I just don't bring anyone, not even a secretary. He was puzzled at that time-you don't like grand, why don't you want to dig someone to be grand? Still can't dig people? I said, we really don't have to dig mountains. We have many excellent talents, and we can use grand talents to complete our career development.

Is Shanda outstanding? Very good. But compared with Microsoft, it is definitely not as good as Microsoft. What is the reason why I didn't dig anyone? If I bring 20 people from Microsoft, it will definitely form a Microsoft gang and a grand gang. If there is no gang, I will bring one. Although these people are easy for me to use, they know my values and ways of doing things. They will work well in the first three months, but there will be big problems after three months. ?

Shanda employees will definitely say: why are Microsoft employees so self-righteous after they come? In fact, they don't understand us As long as I am dissatisfied with a person, I will always be dissatisfied with me. Then why should I cause others' fear? Any company, anyone who brings his own staff, must be a wrong start. ?

For another example, I have just entered Shanda for two years and work 12 hours a day. Now that I think about it, it's actually a bit artificial. Do I really need to sit in the office for 12 hours every day? Not exactly. But Shanda is an entrepreneurial culture, and each employee works 12 hours. If you work in a foreign company for 8 hours, no one will value you. Be sure to get through this 12 hour, and let them agree with you at the initial stage, saying that Tang Jun is also doing things with great fanfare with entrepreneurial heart. ?

The third is understanding. You should be understood by many people around you, employee, Chen Tianqiao. I don't dig people, and Chen Tianqiao doesn't understand me. I finally managed to persuade him. ?

But the most important thing is ability-what can you bring to Shanda? Many people also question, Tang Jun, you are a vase, and it will be almost a year. Why are there often rumors of Tang Jun's resignation? Because it's a vase. Looking at the vase is enough. This is not a marriage. You can still use it when you are married. Your manager is a vase. You can go when you are famous. I, Tang Jun, am a little Starlight Glimmer, but fundamentally, I will never relax myself. In the end, people will also look at your fundamentals: diligence, ability to handle affairs, and being a person, which I will not give up. I have always despised all problems strategically, thinking that everything can be solved, but when I do something specific, I always have the mentality of being uncertain: alas, this problem may not be solved, so I must do it seriously. ?

But in the final analysis, these summaries all come from the estimation of human nature. I saw a stranger in the street, and I wanted to know what he was thinking. Thinking about human nature has become my habit. First, I like simplicity. Second, I like honesty. ?

If you know me better, you will find that I am a very simple person. What are the advantages of simplicity? Even if you meet a complicated person, he can't do anything about you because you are simple. He's complicated. He is good at playing politics, so can you, but if you can't play with him, you will get hurt. On the contrary, if you play and I don't play, the rules of the game are different between us, and the routines are different, so he can't beat you. You keep it simple, and no one will fight you in the end. If you can't win, you should still use static braking. I won't move. You come. This is the conclusion I have drawn for myself in my past career. ?

Finally, I hope that the success of Tang Jun's style can be replicated. The core of this success is to have a good personality, such as sunshine, cheerfulness and responsibility. If a person must choose a quality, I choose kindness. The best character is not to criticize the character of others. This is not a lack of character, but this character has been tested and fixed into Tang Jun mode. Anyone can get along well with this model, and like it if it is good. ?

Break the tragic fate of Wang

In ancient China, assistance was fated. Reese, Sean, Xiao He and Han Xin all had unfortunate endings. ?

I think my assistance has a very clear way and future goal-not lifelong assistance, but eternal assistance will not have a good result. My assistance is phased assistance, and I will leave after completing the task. This is my values. Maybe I'll get off at the middle stop and take the next stop. For example, I have been on the Microsoft train, and I know how the railway works. The next stop immediately caught the train of Shanda, and when Shanda came down, he caught up with Xinhuadu step by step. ?

Actually, I am running my career, and I regard myself as a business. Operating a business has its own brand, and I am also operating my brand, my influence and my value. I run my Tang Jun's career exactly the same as running a business, with clear plans. Enterprises will transform, so will I. I jumped into Microsoft to enter the mainstream and end the start-up period. I jumped from Microsoft to Shanda and improved the operation ability of the capital market. I jumped from Shanda to Xinhuadu, and my value was improved. Microsoft to Shanda is a platform jump, and Shanda to Xinhua is a high jump. ?

Some people say that Zhuge Liang is the benchmark for professional managers in China, but I'm afraid I don't agree. In ancient China, those politicians were all centered on others, and everything was for you and worked hard for you. I am a self-centered business model. I run by myself. To improve yourself, you just gave me a platform. ?

How to properly adjust and effectively distinguish the personal brand and corporate brand of professional managers? ?

When I first went to Shanda, my brand was definitely bigger than Shanda's brand, but if I only pay attention to Tang Jun's brand, this brand will definitely go on. The second step must be to run a big brand. With the grand brand, Tang Jun's brand will be available at this time, because I am the president of Shanda. It is impossible to support a grand brand with Tang Jun's brand forever. This is very difficult. It is impossible for one person to support a company. First, I will upgrade the Shanda brand to a stage, and the rest is more about managing the Shanda brand. After the grand promotion, because I am the president of Shanda, my brand will naturally upgrade and there will be intersections. At this time, I am a brand above the grand. ?

Speaking of personal brand, I am also a star among domestic professional managers. There are good and bad things about professional managers being starred. It's not good because the boss always thinks that you are doing something wrong, but it's good because someone wants to help professional managers in China complain that their salaries are low and they are not so respected in society, which is not considered as the road to success. I am willing to be a spokesperson. ?

I have always said that I want to be a benchmark for professional managers in China. The first spark of this ambition didn't come from the beginning. It appeared in the most difficult time of my career-the end of 2005 and the beginning of 2006. ?

At that time, Shanda was in a downturn and its performance was poor. Internal staff began to doubt our ability. The media also said that Shanda has gone downhill. Has this industry come to an end? Shanda's share price has fallen to 12, and my option price is 1 1, which is basically worthless. At this time, almost all professional managers will leave. Professional managers should be "Man struggles upwards and water flows downwards". If Tang Jun doesn't go when he is going downhill, others will wonder if you have nowhere else to go except to stay in Shanda. At that time, I thought, I must resist, I must persist in doing it, and I must fight for the professional managers in China. ?

I didn't leave at that time, which was both a career choice and a sustenance. When my parents were in America, they said, come back. You are not short of money, but you still suffer so much and suffer so much injustice. Is it necessary? ?

I asked myself, am I in pain? I don't think I'm suffering. If a person is suffering, it depends on what he pursues first. At that time, I made it clear for the first time that my pursuit was to be a benchmark for professional managers, and professional managers were my career. Generally speaking, people in China say that a person wants to do something in a shopping mall, that is, he wants to be an entrepreneur. The so-called working emperor, professional manager is just a job. But I think my role is finally clear-I am a professional manager, not an entrepreneur in the traditional sense.

Six passwords of CEO of "10 billion yuan worth"

The goal is to be a professional manager. I am a professional manager, not an entrepreneur in the traditional sense. ?

A hidden rule of electric power China enterprises: the chairman is the CEO. Managers should look down on power and even give it up. ?

The easiest way to avoid communication failure is to make all your decisions cross. ?

How do professional managers fight for their own interests? Argument is argument. ?

To adjust the mentality, it is necessary to adjust the mentality of such a second person. ?

Simple+Frank You did it simply. In the end, no one will fight you, and there is no way to win.