"Some people say that poverty is because there is no virtue!" Does that make sense? Who put forward this idea?

A person who says that he is poor because he has no virtue must be a narrow-minded person who regards individual phenomena as universal truths, otherwise he is a person without virtue. He must have done a shameful thing when he was at the end of the road. It was a coincidence that he made a windfall and washed it away. He regarded his personal experience as the nature of others and thought that others were on the same side as him. Virtue without virtue lies not in poverty and wealth, but in thought, in family education, and more importantly, in its influence on his work, study and life. The ancients' "those who are close to ink are black" is a summary of historical experience and a universal law of life. Being poor helps the world, which is a moral cultivation program put forward and advocated by Mencius, a Confucian sage, and is the goal of guiding the society towards harmony. This moral model can only be used as a warning, a method to persuade people to persuade the world, rather than a social legal norm. Therefore, the rich can learn, and the poor can be used as inspiration. Their real practice and success are only those sages with great wisdom and perseverance. As ordinary people, no matter rich or poor, they all benefit from profit. If they can achieve 120%, they will be considered as good people with conscience. Especially now, the propaganda of materialism and entertainment to death is full of cultural positions. Privatization and the development of market economy have triggered the expansion of people's selfish desires. Beneficiaries get carried away, those who don't think too much help the world, and those who are dissatisfied regard poverty as a fig leaf and a good medicine for self-comfort, which has long since deviated from this moral paradigm. At this stage of social development, the disparity between the rich and the poor has become an established fact, but it cannot be changed. The state has made great efforts to help the poor with preferential policies. It is also proposed that the land revenue should be tilted towards "agriculture, countryside and farmers", so as to build China into a powerful country and enrich the people. At the critical moment, someone throws out the remark that "the poor have no virtue", which I think is a stab in the heart of the poor, in an attempt to provoke the contradiction between the rich and the poor and trigger social unrest, with a view to achieving ulterior motives. As for who threw out the argument, nine times out of ten, foreign hostile forces, domestic agents and bourgeois forces tried to change the color of the country. Everyone knows Si Mazhao's intentions, so be alert!

The so-called virtue refers to a person's character, which has no direct relationship with the rich and the poor. Because wealth and moral character are two different things, you can't say that your moral character is good, so you can make financial resources roll in, because whoever is extremely bad and treacherous will keep money away from him. Often, a person with high moral character has a poor family background, while those who are dishonest still have extraordinary scenery, both in the past and now. Therefore, wealth and poverty are not caused by virtue, but people often lose virtue because of wealth, such as corrupt elements who immigrate to the United States; Although the broad masses of laborers, peasants and workers are not completely out of poverty or completely rich at present, they love the motherland, are hardworking and self-respecting, and resolutely follow the socialist road with the party, which is 10,000 times stronger than those rich people who worship foreign things and flatter foreign countries and take refuge in the United States.

In my opinion, it is totally unreasonable to say that people are poor because they have no virtue, and this statement does not necessarily come from the mouth of the rich, let alone from the mouth of the poor. It should come from reactionary celebrities and elites who look down on the poor, the workers and peasants and take the people as their enemies!

The above is only my personal opinion and will not be imposed on anyone.

This sentence is meaningless. The root of poverty comes from society, itself and human struggle. This is my opinion that it is immoral to cover up my lazy thoughts. Poverty is also caused by many factors. Don't blame this or that, only blame yourself for being poor. Sometimes earning millions can be digested by a serious illness. Sometimes your career is booming, and a natural disaster becomes a scavenger and a beggar! Things in the world cannot be explained clearly. The poor and the rich are what God wants, as long as you work hard. If you do it, you deserve to live in vain once in your life. As for whether there is virtue, that is another way of saying it. Life is unpredictable. Everyone wants to have sex. After all, few people have fun. Follow your intuition. Go and live. In the words of the present era, it is not necessary to be rich if you are poor. More importantly, you are healthy, which is the best way to get rich. If you spend too much money, people will be gone and money will be useless to you. Only good health is capital. Poor or rich, good health is good, and more money is enough. It is better to talk about happiness than poverty and wealth. Talking about money and wealth is better than talking about longevity.