Is the whole headhunting management system useful?

It's quite easy to use, and the system is really cautious. . . Give you some advice.

First, choose a major! If it is not advertised as a headhunting system, it is really suitable for headhunting, such as old systems like Yuanyang, Caidie and Kingdee, or it is not suitable for headhunting or has old-fashioned functions. Often after the completion of the project, it is necessary to enter data back, which is not conducive to improving efficiency.

Second, choose a good reputation! Powerful. Markets like Gulu and Quanhun all belong to version 3.0 of headhunting system, with innovative functions and strong usability. The reputation of the products is really pleasing. A casual search will reveal that their predecessor is the golden strategy system. There have been negative reports such as data leakage and product plagiarism, and they have also declared security and local deployment, which has a poor reputation.

Third, we must try it out. The selection system is not cabbage selection, and it does not experience the function in depth, and it is not optimistic about whether it is professional or not. It will go into the pit. We have just visited and used the whole recruitment system for more than three months, because their 10 employees can use it for free. Number of subsequent paid upgrades. Regardless of system collaboration, resume analysis and system maintenance. And the fluency of use is good in all aspects. The system should be careful when it is used in depth to make decisions on the final selection of the team. If it is not well saved, it will switch back and forth.