When interviewing, ask yourself what your shortcomings are and how to answer them.

If the examiner asks you about your shortcomings during the interview, the best way is not to avoid the examiner's questions, but to tell your own shortcomings directly. But there should be a supplement, the examiner should know that he is a person who can find his own shortcomings and reflect on himself.

An interviewer will always have several interviews in his life, either for work or for other competitions. In short, the purpose of the interview is to let the candidates show their excellent side, while the examiner wants to dig out the hidden side of the candidates. Therefore, the interview is originally a wrestling match, which means fighting with wits, but if it is completely opportunistic, it may not be worth the candle. Although the examiner wants to know what the candidate is not good at, his purpose is not to explore the privacy of the candidate, but mainly to make an evaluation to see if the candidate meets the standards of this interview. In other words, candidates' imperfect answers may not be eliminated, mainly depending on the candidates' wit.

A sincere and tactful answer certainly does not mean that candidates can be angry with the examiner without reservation. After all, they are still interviewing, and all interviews are the same. They need to have a good communication environment with the examiner and also need to give the examiner a satisfactory answer. When the examiner asks a sensitive topic like his own shortcomings, if the answer has no shortcomings, it will make the examiner feel that either the candidate is deliberately avoiding the question and hiding his personality problems, or the candidate is too conceited and thinks that he has shortcomings, which is a shortcoming. In either case, the examiner will not think that the candidate's answer is satisfactory.

At this time, if candidates seriously think about their own shortcomings, after all, no one is perfect and everyone has shortcomings. Tell the examiner, of course, it is necessary to add their own remedies and understanding of shortcomings, which will make the examiner feel that candidates at least know themselves and are changing their shortcomings. This kind of answer will be more sincere, reflecting the candidate's thinking ability and progress ability, and it is a more euphemistic answer. It can't be said that this kind of answer must be the most satisfactory answer for the examiner, but it will leave a good impression on the examiner.