Difference between Zhongfa 3 1 and 16

The difference between Zhong Fa 3 1 and 16 lies in its emphasis on content.

1 and Zhong Fa [202 1] 3 1 emphasize that in the new stage of development, to strengthen social governance at the grassroots level, we must adhere to the guidance of party building and put the party's leadership throughout the whole process and all aspects of social governance at the grassroots level; The document Zhong Fa [202 1] 16 emphasizes that promoting the governance of towns (streets) and urban and rural communities as a whole is the basic project to realize the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity.

2. Zhong Fa [202 1]3 1 proposed to improve the mechanism of correctly handling contradictions among the people under the new situation, adhere to and develop the "Maple Bridge Experience" in the new period, and improve the comprehensive management mechanism of social contradictions; Document Zhong Fa [202 1] 16 emphasizes improving the level of socialization, legalization, intelligence and specialization of grassroots governance.

3. The document Zhong Fa [202 1]3 1 proposes to improve the social governance system of co-construction, co-governance and sharing, strengthen and innovate grassroots social governance, and improve the efficiency of social governance; Document Zhong Fa [202 1] 16 emphasizes the benign interaction among government governance, social supervision and residents' autonomy.