Read the article on recruiting thieves and answer it.

If it were me, I would sue, because Mike's theft was carried out when he was forced by life to apply for a job and was induced to sign an agreement by a trustee who was closely related to him. This is a legal means for Johnson to cover up his illegal purpose, that is, he violated most of the money in Article 58 of the General Principles of Civil Law of our country. The customary law in the world also has this provision, and Johnson has no right to deprive Mike of his inheritance. Johnson & Johnson has many illegal acts, so I won't mention them one by one.