What is the form of interrogative sentences in Korean?

Style, that is, the expression of language, refers to the type of language style based on the function of language expression. Style is a variant of speech function with certain language characteristics, which adapts to a certain language environment (context) and serves a certain communication field. It is a language style formed historically to meet different communication needs when using language.

Style is usually divided into two categories: oral style and written style, and each category can be divided into its subordinate types. Different styles have different rhetorical features. Spoken style is formed to meet the needs of oral communication, and its rhetorical style is characterized by simplicity, naturalness and no deliberate carving, and the structure and organization of language are leaping. ?

Written style is formed to meet the needs of written communication, and its rhetorical style is characterized by elegance, standardization and meticulous processing, and the language pays attention to structural integrity and clarity. The higher the cultural quality of a nation, the smaller the gap between the two styles; The lower the cultural quality, the greater the gap between the two styles. ?

Style and style are both related and different. Their connection lies in the fact that a certain style needs a corresponding style, otherwise it will appear uncoordinated. The differences between them are as follows: first, there are differences between spoken and written styles. Generally speaking, mouth shape and style are obviously different. Second, as far as written style is concerned, it is also different from literary style. Style refers to the genre of an article, which is the expression of the article. For example, some transactional styles need a certain format, which is obviously not a language problem; Style refers to the application system of language materials, involving language factors such as pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar. ?

(2) What are the characteristics of various oral styles?

Spoken style is one of the two types of style, and it is the basis of written style. Spoken language is a typical form, which has the characteristics of extensive use of spoken language, vivid communication process, simplicity and variability of language expression. Including "one-way monologue oral style" and "two-way dialogue oral style", each category includes two small types. ?

1. One-way monologue oral style?

One-way monologue oral style is a kind of oral style in which there is no immediate role translocation between the speaker and the listener during a long period of oral activities. It includes two types: speech and speech. ?

(1) Transactional Oral Style-Talking? Speech is generally used in formal social occasions, with the communication affairs as the discourse content, and the speaker uses calm expression as a means to gain the acceptance and understanding of the audience. A speech can be an active speech prepared in advance, or an impromptu speech without prior preparation. From the perspective of language expression, a speech as a spoken language generally has three characteristics: first, it is ceremonial, paying attention to the identity of the audience and coordinating the relationship with the audience; Second, be concise and to the point, and pay attention to acceptability and timeliness. Generally speaking, the audience of a wonderful speech will not get bored, otherwise, the longer the speech, the worse the effect; Third, it is exciting. Attention should be paid to the content of the speech, and the choice of words and sentences should be as exciting and attractive as possible. For example:?

199 1 year 1 1 month, China's Golden Rooster Award and Hundred Flowers Award were announced at the same time in Beijing, and Li won the Best Actor Award for his leading role in Jiao. Li made an impromptu speech at the award ceremony. He expressed his feelings and feelings with two contrasting short sentences: "Bitterness and tiredness make a good man-Jiao Youlu; Both fame and fortune were won by a silly boy-Li. " Hardly had his voice fallen when the audience applauded. ?

His speech has three characteristics: etiquette, conciseness and brilliance. Pay attention to acceptability and timeliness, and coordinate the relationship with the audience. It also carefully chooses words, sentence patterns and rhetorical methods, and expresses its guilt modestly while praising Jiao's noble qualities. It also has a good sense of humor, leaving a beautiful and deep impression on people. ?

(2) Elegant oral style-speech? Speech is usually used in public meetings, with the theme of the speech as the content and the speaker as a means of publicity and encouragement. In order to win the recognition and acceptance of as many people as possible. A speech can be a premeditated speech fully prepared in advance, or an impromptu speech induced by accidental factors. From the perspective of language expression, oral style generally has two characteristics:

First, it is organized, and the speech is a one-way oral expression higher than the speech. The content of exposition and expression need not be short, but the words and sentences should be accurate and logical;

Second, it is encouraging. We should choose wonderful words, sentences and figures of speech, and use some artistic means and skills to arouse the audience's attention, influence their attitude, arouse their emotions and arouse their resonance. For example:?

When you have no talent?

Young friends: among us young people, it is easiest to see those who are not talented and to hear those who are not talented. Many people look at the world coldly and laugh about heroes. I can't help asking, are we really incompetent There is a kind of person who hates death in Lu Xun's works. While saying that you don't have that talent, you are crazy about gambling and drinking dozens of bowls of wine without money. Mr. Wang asked them, "Can you pick one weighing four catties?" Sanli Road, can we walk? "We might as well ask ourselves: What can I do? What have I done? Failure to meet talents is the misfortune of the times, and failure to meet talents is a personal sorrow. But Confucius did not meet, and no one dared to correct the name of a generation of masters; Qu Yuan did not meet, and the memory of the Dragon Boat Festival in May has never changed. Li Bai didn't meet, and the glory of fighting wine penetrated history ... It's a pity, but the achievement is still heavy. Pretending to force seems neither elegant nor fashionable. When you have no talent, you should honestly admit that you have no talent, but you have no talent. Now is the economic Warring States period, there is no need to lament that "scholars hate the Warring States period". It is often said that the world today faces three major crises, namely, ecological crisis, population crisis and energy crisis. In fact, there is another crisis in the world that should also be taken seriously, and that is the talent crisis. No wonder some people call the talent crisis the fourth biggest crisis in the world. The practice of market economy has proved that whoever has talents will have development advantages and quality benefits. In case you don't notice, job advertisements are overwhelming, and the recruitment of special envoys is like a shuttle, and exchange activities are one after another. Talents are getting hotter and hotter, and the conditions are very favorable: house, professional title, treatment and conditions. The market is naturally equal, the more knowledge, the more useful it is, and the stronger the ability, the more money it will make. The question is, dare you apply? Maybe you don't have to apply, and it's not that you don't have a chance to prove yourself on the job. You can write books, invent, innovate, increase income and reduce expenses. What is talent? Anyone who has made a certain contribution to the progress of society with his own specialty in a certain field is a talent. At the same time, those who have empty diplomas but have no real talents, those who can brag but can't do things, and those who think they are talented but can't prove them can't be called talents. Confucius said: "There is no place for suffering, but for suffering. "Not suffering from adversity, but suffering from incompetence. How well this is said! When you have no talent, you can't do something together, which will be boring. Many young friends live below average, but they are more than enough. They are not full, but they are not hungry. He said in his mouth, "If you don't do the work, you will get the money, and there will be no adjustment left, and you will be punished for making noise. "In fact, psychological activities are quite complicated. I am eager for the things in the pot, but I can't bear the things in the bowl; I am not satisfied with what is in the bowl, but I don't have the courage to fight for what is in the pot. Gaze and swallow in the gap between superiority and loss. I think these friends should either settle down, do their jobs well and strive for success, or "a strong man's broken wrist will never return" and "a hero who jumps into the sea will never be rewarded". Anyway, we can't make do with it, we can't muddle along. Also, when you have no talent, don't use the excuse that "people over 30 don't learn art" to anesthetize yourself. Yes, with the development of economy, some knowledge has appreciated and some knowledge has depreciated. I study history, and I used to think that people have to understand history, but as a major, it is very sad. Coincidentally, one of my colleagues also graduated from the philosophy department of Peking University. He said to me: people can't help but understand philosophy, but it's sad to be a major. So I think, we already know what we can't help but understand, and then learn some applicable things according to our own needs, isn't it more powerful? What's more, without professional people, great things have been achieved. Occupation only provides a foundation for human development, but the development of society is changing with each passing day. If it remains unchanged, it will be eliminated and left out in the cold. It can only be ridiculous and sad for daydreaming to regard rigid dogma and stale knowledge as stocks that only go up but don't fall, and to pretend to be the authority and experts of today's developing market economy, and to fantasize that he can share the dividends of economic development in large quantities with little effort. ?

Friends, the winner looks bright because you are curled up in the dark. Come out, young friend, and stride forward. Show your skills and make contributions on the big stage of socialist market economy. However, there is a nasty feeling that will accompany you-you will never have enough talent! ? Thank you! ?

What is extracted here is a speech. The speaker used propaganda and encouraging language to express and chose wonderful words, which aroused the resonance of the audience. ?

2. Two-way conversation oral style?

Two-way conversational oral style refers to a kind of oral style in which the roles of the speaker and the listener can be exchanged at any time in the instant interactive oral activities in which two or more parties directly participate. It includes two types: conversation and argument. ?

(1) Daily Spoken Style-Conversation? Conversations can be used in both formal and informal situations. It takes the exchange of opinions or feelings as the discourse content, and the speaker uses the language expression of interactive information as a means to realize the communication between two or more parties. It can be a chat without a fixed serious purpose (such as chatting) or a question and answer with a fixed serious purpose (such as a conversation between an organization and an individual). From the perspective of language expression, colloquial conversation style generally has two characteristics:

First, focus on the same thing, talk about things of common concern, don't answer irrelevant questions, don't beat around the bush, it is best to talk about depth or breadth;

Second, be flexible and frank, choose words suitable for oral expression, and express them fluently and freely. For example:?

A: Since ancient times, there has been a saying that "talented women look good", which shows that people pay more attention to a woman's appearance when evaluating her quality, and beautiful women are always pleasing. ?

I don't think we can judge a book by its cover. The evaluation of a person's beauty and ugliness should include both appearance and mind, and the evaluation of women is no exception. The beauty of women's appearance is of course beautiful, but I think the beauty of mind is more important than the beauty of mind. ?

C: I also think physical beauty is not as good as spiritual beauty. Pure physical beauty has stages, and beauty will not last long. It will rot. Even an absolutely beautiful beauty will always get old. Beauty can't stay with people for a lifetime, but the beauty of the soul will last forever. Only when the beauty of appearance is attached to the beauty of mind can it really shine. ?

A: After hearing what you said, I think it makes sense. I want to make an analogy. The beauty of appearance is like the exquisite packaging of an article. Its value lies in making articles more attractive and welcoming people's direct love. The same is true of beautiful women. She can attract the attention of the outside world earlier and make a good impression at first. But if things and people don't have inner beauty, what emerges after opening the exquisite package is an ugly core, which is "the golden jade is outside, but the defeat is among them", but it is easy to adapt. ?

B: I want to add that physical beauty is innate, and it can only belong to some people, even a small number of people. There are always few beautiful women in the world, but there is no limit to the number of people with beautiful hearts, because spiritual beauty is acquired, just like a person's ability, it can be educated and cultivated, and everyone can get it through hard work. What's more, people are gregarious animals, and the value orientation of human society is more recognized as acquired. ?

C: This time, I finally understand that only those who are beautiful in appearance but not in spirit are actually not beautiful at all; People who are not beautiful in appearance but beautiful in heart are actually beautiful; If there is a person with beautiful appearance and soul, then she does have the beauty that makes people dump; A person who has neither physical beauty nor spiritual beauty, then we have to say that she is really not beautiful. ?

The above is a conversation between three college students about "female beauty", with the same concentration and frank attitude. They are all talking about things of common concern, with a certain depth and breadth. First, A put forward the traditional understanding of female beauty, then B put forward the correct criteria for evaluating female beauty, and then C further emphasized the importance of spiritual beauty. A also explained by metaphor that we should not pursue the beauty of appearance unilaterally, and then B further discussed the value of the beauty of the soul from the perspective of innate and acquired. Finally, C further deepened his understanding and pointed out four situations: the most beautiful, the most beautiful, the least beautiful and the least beautiful.

(2) the oral way of dispute-debate? Debate can be used in formal occasions (such as court debates) or informal occasions (such as quarrels in life). It takes arguing about right and wrong or distinguishing between good and evil as the discourse content, and the debater uses criticism and refutation as the means to persuade or surrender the other side. Debates include life debates, official debates and sports debates. It is a two-way oral expression higher than conversation. From the perspective of language expression, the oral style of argumentative essays generally has two characteristics: first, the language is accurate and concise, the words are accurate and appropriate, and the sentence selection is concise and smooth; Second, the expression logic is strict, whether it is to refute the other party or to defend one's own side, it must be reasonable and impeccable. For example:? What is the record of the pros and cons of the final of the First International Chinese College Students Debate Competition? (Singapore, August 29th, 1993)? The President (Li Xueping): Welcome back to the debate. Now we invite Jiang Changjian, the fourth representative of the opposition party, to make a four-minute concluding speech. (Applause)? Jiang Changjian (Grade 3, Master Class, Department of International Politics, Fudan University): Thank you. A serious debate field needs a serious concept. The other party asked us many times how human nature is. What about humanity? Never ask us what human nature is like. Excuse me, what is human nature and what is human nature are the same concept? If you don't even have the basic foundation of this concept, where does your argument come from? We have asked each other many times how good flowers bear the bad consequences, and the other party said that they should be watered and fertilized. Then I don't understand. If everyone owes this sunshine and rain, why are there so many crimes all over the world? Do you still have a soft spot for this water and that fat? Why give a handsome "kiss goodbye" to the evildoer? (Laughter and applause)? Today, in pursuit of truth, we should discuss this endless topic with each other for thousands of years. No matter Mencius' theory of good nature or Xunzi's theory of evil nature, which family or faction doesn't want us to suppress evil and promote good? Suppressing evil and promoting good is a fundamental starting point for us to establish our position today. Let me sum up our views again.

First, only by knowing that human nature is evil can we face up to history and reality. When I look back on history, my heart always feels pain and trembling. From the Persian War to the Crusades, from Hitler's Auschwitz concentration camp to the North China germ testing ground of the Japanese invaders, it can really be described as "Erotic and greedy Qi Fei, ambition is violent". In the past, human history can be said to be intertwined with human endless greed. It can be seen that if the evil of human nature is not controlled, what will it bring to the world? ?

Second, only by understanding the evil of human nature can we attach importance to the role of moral and legal education, the results of human civilization guidance, and cultivate a sound and upward personality. In the ups and downs of history, human beings have not brought their own destruction. Especially in the face of Singapore's polite, kind and friendly friends, we have more reason to believe that the future of mankind will be better, thanks to Singapore's unremitting efforts to establish their excellent social education system. Human civilization continues to prosper under the light of human wisdom. We would like to take this opportunity to thank those Chinese and western sages who have shed hard sweat on the road of human education. It is precisely because of their theoretical wisdom and their practice that people can embark on rational self-discipline and self-discipline of human evil from external coercion, thus cultivating a sound and good personality. It can be seen that human nature is evil, which does not mean that people are evil all their lives. As long as we can abandon evil and promote good through the social education system, we can turn evil into falsehood! ?

Third, only by understanding the evil of human nature can we mobilize all social education means to promote the good and avoid the evil. Time flies, the dead are like this, and the material and technology are advancing by leaps and bounds, and the spiritual home of mankind can be described as flowers and fruits. At this time, we should be alert to the basic proposition that human nature is evil. Fortunately, in the land of the East, we say that the development of traditional culture has started from a sunny day and moved towards a new spring. We also believe that through the essence of traditional culture, human beings will be reasonably restrained and guided from unrestrained desires, from heteronomy to self-discipline, from law enforcement to legislation. Only humans can turn the tide and help the building collapse. "The night gave me black eyes, but I was destined to use them to find light!" Thank you! (Applause)?

The President (Li Xueping): Thank you, Jiang Changjian. Finally, we invite Wang Xinguo, the fourth representative of the active party, to make a concluding speech for four minutes. (Applause)?

Wang Xinguo (second year, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University): Hello! Let's go back to an evil world built on the other side and see what happened in this world. Another debater told us that human nature is evil and he made three big mistakes first. The first big mistake is summed up from the rule of empirical facts. The other debater listed many evil things in the world and told us that human nature is evil, which is wrong! Why? The argument of the other debater tells us that people have desires. But we think that we have proved that there are good and bad desires. I like you today, and I want to marry you. Is this a bad desire? So in the end, we know that today, the other debater saw the evil deeds in the world, some evil deeds, and then told us that human nature is evil. Then why did the other debater ignore the kindness presented in the empirical facts? You must have heard of many good deeds in the world. Someone falls to the ground, you pick him up, and you give your seat to the old man in the car. Or, you must have heard the advice of anonymous people. Aren't these good deeds human? This is the first big mistake made by the opposing defense friend. ?

The second biggest mistake was that the defensive friend of the other side made a consequential mistake. Another debater borrows a rule of empirical facts to tell us that we have evil consequences, so evil is the cause. If this is true, what will we find? Everyone is evil, especially when the other debater keeps telling us that we need education and moral education. How do you educate? Everyone is evil, so the real law is made, and the made law is the good law? The wicked decide evil laws. If a law is made, how can we abide by it? Everyone is evil. Why should I believe you? It seems that everyone is in this place. Why should I believe you? You may be lying to me, so all of us here wear masks. Everyone deceives each other and blinds each other. This world was built by other debaters. He told us that the evil world was built because of desire.

What was the third mistake made by the opposing defense friend? He told us that the essence of human nature is desire, and we simply know that we have demonstrated from the beginning that human nature is human heart. Mencius told us: "People have four hearts." This is a kind seed, and we have never denied that there is no evil in the world. Just because you have good seeds doesn't mean you won't do evil. Why? We find that because of the lack of external environment and resources, we will do some evil acts to hurt others invisibly, which is a last resort. Therefore, our education and laws are aimed at correcting people's behavior. If it is evil according to what the other defense friend told us, why should we correct it? Human nature is evil, and the result of human correction is to return to nature. Our people are originally kind, because we know that everyone has a kind heart, so through morality, education and law, he may become kind. The role of education and law is to guide him to the good path, so education is booming in this place. Another debater gave us an example, telling us how primitive people burned and looted and how primitive people lost their lives. What we are telling you is that primitive man's initial desire for survival is different from nature. Because if you say that five people are hungry at the same time, and there is a piece of bread over there, and one person runs over to eat it, no one will criticize him morally at this time. Because survival at this time is based on morality. You have no personal life and no desire to live. How can you talk about morality? So the condition of primitive people is an animal instinct. So, at the beginning, the other debater's mistake was to tell us that human nature is desire. If it is really desire, how can people and animals be divided? People are different from animals. Self-mind is a matter of self-mind. ? That's why we say people have good prospects. Today, the other debater told us that it was all sunshine and rain, and there was nothing wrong! But there is wind and rain, because your wind and rain, your external environment, of course, you will do evil behavior. So we should correct him and let him move towards a better world. So, let's look at all the good deeds in the world! Historically, from the current experience and facts, it is found that people with lofty ideals have been killed throughout the ages, and so on. What's more, at present, people like Mother Teresa say that Anhui in mainland China is short of water, and master Yan Zheng's Tzu Chi behavior. How do you explain it? Mencius told us: "When I saw a boy, I fell into the well." You will save him at such a moment, you can't push him down. Why? Human nature is good. Don't tell me that you saved that child for a hollow reputation. It turns out that crossing the road should obey the traffic rules. You are fake. It turns out that Mother Teresa saved you, which was a lie. In the end, you will find that only sharks in Repulse Bay are good people. What kind of world is this? This is a terrible world. The world exists because we have good roots. Thank you (applause)