Who is more suitable to work in the establishment?

In recent years, more and more young people choose to work in institutions. However, an article said that not everyone is suitable, which attracted the attention of netizens. Let's talk about related topics.

First, what is internal strength?

Establishment refers to the staff who have entered the work of government agencies and institutions through formal assessment and registered in the organization department and personnel bureau, and their work is relatively stable.

Some netizens said that it has little to do with personality, both inside and outside the establishment. After all, every industry has people with different personalities. Yes, that's what I thought.

But if we really want to get to the bottom of it, as the subject said, I personally feel that honesty is just food and clothing, and I really don't care about anything. There are also introverted, family-oriented women, and people with good family conditions tend to feel happy ... very suitable ~

People with good family conditions

For people with good family conditions, such people don't have much demand for money and are prone to happiness. Because they don't worry about life, they get paid every month, and they don't have to pay back their mortgage and car loan, so they don't have to think too much. They just need to spend the money they earn.

Family-oriented women

Anyone who has looked for a job knows that many enterprises, including large factories, still discriminate against women in employment because they have to take maternity leave, take care of their children and take care of their families.

Therefore, internal strength is very suitable for those women who are more family-oriented. Usually there are many holidays, so I can take care of my family and children. Even if there is maternity leave and annual leave, it will not be deducted without reason. They are all paid holidays, five insurances and one gold, and so on.

An introverted person

Some people are introverted and don't like to deal with people. If you work in a public institution, although it is important to deal with people, only a few people get promoted. Most of them are ordinary clerks who have worked all their lives, and everyone seems to get by.

Therefore, introversion has little effect on work. Work within the establishment, make no big mistakes, and will not be fired. If you meet a leader who likes to work hard and is introverted, there may be opportunities for development.

Of course, there may be many people who are suitable for working in the establishment, so I won't talk about them in this room ~

Speaking of which, I am also very emotional. Is the work within the establishment good? Reminds me of a sentence: people in the city want to go out and people outside the city want to come in. However, most city people just think about it. Few people really go out. It seems to me that more and more people want to come in.

Therefore, no matter what personality or person, as long as you have the opportunity to come in, you should boldly move forward. After all, there are still many benefits. As for the hopeless promotion, don't take it too seriously. The higher the position, the greater the responsibility. The work in the establishment gives me the feeling that the bottom is the most comfortable.

A friend of mine summed it up very thoroughly: even if the company is not good, I will pay you on time every month. In this respect, it's really the same when you think about it ~

In short, no matter what kind of person you are, your personal interests and specialties are all considerations in your career choice. Although the work within the establishment pays attention to the observance and implementation of rules and regulations, it is indeed more suitable for the above-mentioned people. For those who pursue freedom and entrepreneurship, it may be better for such a group to choose a field that suits their interests and specialties. However, no matter what kind of people, they need to practice a strong heart before entering the society.