University science learning methods

The learning methods of science and liberal arts are very different, mainly because of their different ways of thinking. Scientific thinking mode is mainly logical thinking, so learning science should also be carried out according to logical thinking habits. The following methods can achieve good results for students who are mainly thinking in images or students who are mainly thinking in logic. I am a typical thinking in images. I majored in engineering, but science is difficult to learn. I have achieved good results with this method, as follows:

1. Arrange the weekly study plan according to the course. Curriculum is especially important for science study, especially for students who are not good at science. Science study is closely linked, and the curriculum can ensure that the links are not out of touch. Generally speaking, the timetable is once a week. Review the lessons of the day every day, preview the upcoming courses at least half a day in advance, and summarize this week's study on the last day of each week. Review what you have learned in the past week.

2. It is unrealistic to arrange specific time to make up the difference in the schedule, so it is very important to make up the time reasonably. Generally speaking, the make-up time is between two adjacent courses in the same subject.

For example (science only): Monday morning math is high, and afternoon is average; Differentiation on Tuesday afternoon; Thursday morning is high and afternoon is average; Friday morning, afternoon.

The weekly study plan is: review advanced mathematics and general physics on Monday night and preview differential; Review differential on Tuesday night, preview advanced mathematics and general physics; Review advanced mathematics, general physics and differential on Wednesday night, and preview advanced mathematics and general physics; Review advanced mathematics and general physics on Thursday, and preview differential and general physics. Always review on weekends.

Make-up time in the study plan: after reviewing every day, find the knowledge points that you haven't mastered, record them in the remarks column behind the study plan that day, and solve them before the next class (of course, it is best to solve them in class).

Scientific study attaches great importance to planning. Without planning, it will soon lead to disorder in the learning process. As long as the disorder lasts for more than two weeks (unable to solve, unable to connect), it will become very difficult to reconnect.

Summary: Make a weekly study plan every week, which stipulates the daily review content and preview content. After reviewing every day, you should find out the knowledge points that you didn't master that day and solve them before the next course.

Although it seems simple or even a little stupid, this method can make your science study progress very effective. At present, many college students lack planning in their studies, and liberal arts subjects can't see problems for some time, while science and engineering have become courses with high problems, which is the result of poor academic performance of most science and engineering students.

This is a personal talk, I hope it can help you.

Supplement: The biggest difference between a university and a high school is that the former relies entirely on self-discipline and self-management. Many students have no plans to study. The root of the problem lies in their poor self-management and self-restraint ability. What you said about learning in high school is also applicable in universities. Learning to ask more questions, compare more, sum up more, this is the habit of people who can learn. It should be well preserved.

Personal suggestion: the function of going to college is not to learn much knowledge, but to exercise one's thinking in all directions during the learning process, which is the only function of the university (real learning begins with graduate students). As for the saying "Long live 60 minutes", it is really popular, but there is a great difference in the degree of brain exercise between students with good grades and those with poor grades, and this difference will be reflected in their future work in society. The biggest difference between first-tier universities and second-and third-tier universities lies in the depth of students' knowledge, which is actually the depth of brain training, which directly determines the differences in understanding, thinking, analysis and judgment. No matter how far your future job is from your major (don't think you can cope with your study without working in this major after graduation), this ability will benefit you for life. Therefore, even if the role of the university is to exercise your thinking, you should form a good habit of taking it seriously. During my ten years working in Fortune 500 companies, I recruited thousands of graduates, and I was deeply impressed by the differences between students from different institutions (especially those from Harvard, MIT and Yale). Not studying hard is not only a performance in school, but also a habit of doing things. Students who don't study hard will be more casual after entering the society (usually working for the sake of work, and do as much as they feel they get. The narrowness of this group of people's consciousness and attitude hinders their personal career development. Although I don't advocate studying hard, if you are responsible for yourself, you must form a good habit of taking everything seriously in college, including studying.